A molecular insight into formation of deep eutectic solvents and their application for the enhancement of proton transportation via graphene oxide-based proton exchange membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
The new electrolytes (ethylene glycol (EGL)- and sodium halide-based deep eutectic solvents (DESs)) could enable us to solve the chemical instability and proton transportation problems of proton exchange membrane (PEM) under harsh operating conditions, which is related to the hydroperoxyl or hydroxyl radical’s formations that will attack on the backbones and side chains of PEM. In this regard, the intermolecular interaction of EGL- and sodium chloride-based DES and then its application for the transportation of proton in graphene oxide (GO) based membrane was studied via the classical all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The MD results revealed that the decrease in radial distribution function peak height and number of hydrogen bonding per molecule between EGL, and the formation of new intermolecular interaction between EGL/sodium chloride after the addition of DES components at 298 and 350 K, respectively. Next, the modelling and simulations of the GO and hydronium ion were investigated to mimic the transportation process of hydronium ion via PEM in the absence and presence of EGL- and sodium chloride-based DES. In the absence of DES, the results implied that the hydronium ion diffusion coefficient and the diffusion coefficients of water molecules are similar, because vehicular diffusion mechanism needs synchronized diffusion of both species (water and hydronium ion) at hydration level ((lambda )) 3. Moreover, the transportation of proton increased monotonically as an increase of (lambda ) at 298 and 350 K, respectively. Next, in the presence of EGL- and sodium chloride-based DES electrolyte in GO-based proton exchange membrane yielded improved mobility of hydronium ions at higher temperature (350 K), which could mean that DES could be a promising alternative as an electrolyte for PEM.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Madheswaran D K and Jayakumar A 2021 Bull. Mater. Sci. 44 110.1007/s12034-021-02572-6 ↗
2. Hamrock S J and Yandrasits M A 2006 J. Macromol. Sci. Polym. Rev. 46 21910.1080/15583720600796474 ↗
3. Peighambardoust S J, Rowshanzamir S and Amjadi M 2010 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35 934910.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017 ↗
4. Devanathan R 2008 Energy Environ. Sci. 1 10110.1039/b808149m ↗
5. Li Q, Jensen J O, Savinell R F and Bjerrum N J 2009 Prog. Polym. Sci. 34 44910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.003 ↗
6. Bose S, Kuila T, Nguyen T X H, Kim N H, Lau K T and Lee J H 2011 Prog. Polym. Sci. 36 81310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.003 ↗
7. Kim J, Lee S M, Srinivasan S and Chamberlin C E 1995 J. Electrochem. Soc. 142 267010.1149/1.2050072 ↗
8. Nguyen T V and White R E 1993 J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 217810.1149/1.2220792 ↗
9. Hickner M A, Ghassemi H, Kim Y S, Einsla B R and McGrath J E 2004 Chem. Rev. 104 458710.1021/cr020711a ↗
10. Hickner M A and Pivovar B S 2005 Fuel cells 5 21310.1002/fuce.200400064 ↗
11. Cheddie D and Munroe N 2005 J. Power Sourc. 147 7210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.003 ↗
12. Sahu A K, Pitchumani S, Sridhar P and Shukla A K 2009 Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 28510.1007/s12034-009-0042-8 ↗
13. Beattie P D, Orfino F P, Basura V I, Zychowska K, Ding J, Chuy C et al 2001 J. Electroanal. Chem. 503 4510.1016/S0022-0728(01)00355-2 ↗
14. Zhang L, Chae S R, Hendren Z, Park J S and Wiesner M R 2012 Chem. Eng. J. 204 8710.1016/j.cej.2012.07.103 ↗
15. Gao W, Wu G, Janicke M T, Cullen D A, Mukundan R, Baldwin J K et al 2014 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 358810.1002/anie.201310908 ↗
16. Karimi M B, Mohammadi F and Hooshyari K 2020 J. Membr. Sci. 611 11821710.1016/j.memsci.2020.118217 ↗
17. Abbott A P, Alabdullah S S, Al-Murshedi A Y and Ryder K S 2018 Faraday Discuss. 206 36510.1039/C7FD00153C ↗
18. Sedghamiz M A and Raeissi S 2018 J. Mol. Liq. 269 69410.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.045 ↗
19. Karibayev M and Shah D 2020 Energy Fuels 34 989410.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01721 ↗
20. Li Q, Qian H, Fu X, Sun H and Sun J 2021 Bull. Mater. Sci. 44 110.1007/s12034-020-02288-z ↗
21. Satapathy S, Pawar S, Gupta P K and Varma K B R 2011 Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 72710.1007/s12034-011-0187-0 ↗
22. Shah D, Karibayev M, Adotey E K and Torkmahalleh A M 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 110.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 ↗
23. Majumder S, Matin M A, Sharif A and Arafat M T 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 42 17110.1007/s12034-019-1857-6 ↗
24. Pramod K and Gangineni R B 2015 Bull. Mater. Sci. 38 109310.1007/s12034-015-0894-z ↗
25. Housaindokht M R, Monhemi H, Hosseini H E, Googheri M S S, Najafabadi R I, Ashraf N et al 2013 J. Mol. Liq. 187 3010.1016/j.molliq.2013.05.012 ↗
26. Oostenbrink C, Soares T A, Van der Vegt N F and Van Gunsteren W F 2005 Eur. Biophys. J. 34 27310.1007/s00249-004-0448-6 ↗
27. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark A E and Berendsen H J 2005 J. Comput. Chem. 26 170110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
28. Humphrey W, Dalke A and Schulten K 1996 J. Mol. Graph. 14 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
29. Hub J S, Wolf M G, Caleman C, Maaren P J, Groenhof G and Van Der Spoel D 2014 Chem. Sci. 5 174510.1039/c3sc52862f ↗