journal article·2021-12

Anomalous electrical transport in orientationally controlled trinary hybrids of graphene and twisted bilayer molybdenum disulphide

Shaili Sett, Sudipta Kundu, Saloni Kakkar, Navkiranjot Kaur Gill, Manish Jain, Arindam Ghosh

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Moire superlattices of two-dimensional (2D) materials oriented at low twist angles generate a large-scale interference pattern leading to strong interlayer coupling, which influences the band structure and introduces flatbands. Conventional electronic transport measurements have shown the effects of flatband physics, manifesting as correlated insulating states and emergent superconductivity. In this study, we probe the electronic states in a trinary hybrid of graphene and twisted bilayer (tbl) MoS2. Graphene acts as a sensing layer, which captures the electronic effects of the underlying substrate, and we observe certain anomalies in the electronic characteristics of graphene only in the presence of an underlying 58.5 $$^\circ$$ tbl MoS2, at low temperatures. Interestingly, graphene on tbl MoS2, with twist angle near 0 $$^\circ$$ or on natural bilayer MoS2, does not show any anomalies. Density functional theory calculations show several distinguishable peaks in the density of states at the conduction band edge of twisted MoS2 near 60 $$^\circ$$ . We speculate that the anomaly appears due to fermi level pinning of graphene owing to a large density of states in the flatbands of twisted bilayer MoS2. An analysis of the energetics in the graphene-MoS2 hybrid quantitatively agree with theoretical predictions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Yu H, Liu G B, Tang J, Xu X and Yao W 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e170169610.1126/sciadv.1701696 ↗
2. Bistritzer R and MacDonald A H 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 1223310.1073/pnas.1108174108 ↗
3. Naik M H and Jain M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 26640110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.266401 ↗
4. Kundu S, Naik M H, Krishnamurthy H R and Jain M 2021 arXiv:2103.07447
5. Chen G, Jiang L, Wu S, Lyu B, Li H, Chittari B L et al 2018 Nat. Phys. 15 23710.1038/s41567-018-0387-2 ↗
6. Jin C, Regan E C, Yan A, Utama M I B, Wang D, Zhao S et al 2019 Nature 567 7610.1038/s41586-019-0976-y ↗
7. Tran K, Moody G, Wu F, Lu X, Choi J, Kim K et al 2019 Nature 567 7110.1038/s41586-019-0975-z ↗
8. Cao Y, Luo J Y, Fatemi V, Fang S, Sanchez-Yamagishi J D, Watanabe K et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 11680410.1103/PhysRevLett.117.116804 ↗
9. Cao Y, Fatemi V, Fang S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kaxiras E et al 2018 Nature 556 4310.1038/nature26160 ↗
10. Pan H, Wu F and Sarma S D 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 03308710.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033087 ↗
11. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Ueno K, Tutuc E and LeRoy B J 2019 arXiv:1910.13068
12. Wang L, Shih E M, Ghiotto A, Xian L, Rhodes D A et al 2020 Nat. mater. 19 86110.1038/s41563-020-0708-6 ↗
13. Xu Y, Liu S, Rhodes D A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J et al 2020 Nature 587 21410.1038/s41586-020-2868-6 ↗
14. Naik M H, Kundu S, Maity I and Jain M 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 07541310.1103/PhysRevB.102.075413 ↗
15. Roy K, Padmanabhan M, Goswami S, Sai T P, Ramalingam G, Raghavan S et al 2013 Nat. Nanotech. 8 82610.1038/nnano.2013.206 ↗
16. Mitra S, Kakkar S, Ahmed T and Ghosh A 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 06402910.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064029 ↗
17. Ahmed T, Roy K, Kakkar S, Pradhan A and Ghosh A 2020 2D Mater. 7 02504310.1088/2053-1583/ab771f ↗
18. Kashid R, Mishra J K, Pradhan A, Ahmed T, Kakkar S, Mundada P et al 2020 APL Mater. 8 09111410.1063/5.0020396 ↗
19. Larentis S, Tolsma J R, Fallahazad B, Dillen D C, Kim K, MacDonald A H et al 2014 Nano Lett. 14 203910.1021/nl500212s ↗
20. Guo Y, Liu C, Yin Q, Wei C, Lin S, Hoffman T B et al 2016 ACS Nano 10 898010.1021/acsnano.6b05063 ↗
21. Debnath R, Sett S, Biswas R, Raghunathan V and Ghosh A 2021 Nanotech. 32 45570510.1088/1361-6528/ac1756 ↗
22. Dean C R, Young A F, Meric I, Lee C, Wang L, Sorgenfrei S et al 2010 Nat. Nanotech. 5 72210.1038/nnano.2010.172 ↗
23. Bolotin K I, Sikes K J, Hone J, Stormer H L and Kim P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 09680210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.096802 ↗
24. Pal A N, Kochat V and Ghosh A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 19660110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.196601 ↗
25. Sols F, Guinea F and Neto A C 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 16680310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.166803 ↗
26. Yan R, Zhang Q, Li W, Calizo I, Shen T, Richter C A et al 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 02210510.1063/1.4734955 ↗
27. Howell S L, Jariwala D, Wu C C, Chen K S, Sangwan V K, Kang J et al 2015 Nano Lett. 15 227810.1021/nl504311p ↗
28. Kunstmann J, Wendumu T B and Seifert G 2017 Phys. Status Solidi (b) 254 160064510.1002/pssb.201600645 ↗
29. Mongillo M, Chiappe D, Arutchelvan G, Asselberghs I, Perucchini M, Manfrini M et al 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 23310210.1063/1.4971775 ↗