journal article·2021-04

Hydrogen response of palladium nanoparticles washed with different solvents

POOJA BHARDWAJ, PARTHA BIR BARMAN, SURAJIT KUMAR HAZRA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogen sensor response of palladium (Pd) nanoparticles changes when the nanoparticles are washed with different solvents prior to device formation. This study presents the effect of washing Pd nanoparticles with distilled water or ethanol on their hydrogen response. The change induced in the surface characteristics of the Pd nanoparticles after washing is analysed with the help of UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy and glancing angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) studies. The nature of strain in nanoparticles after washing is particularly analysed from GAXRD data to understand the hydrogen response mechanism. The performance of the nanoparticle-based devices in humid ambient was also studied and the results were correlated to the consequence of sample washing. A suitable sensing mechanism within the purview of Langmuir model is discussed to understand the role of washing of the palladium nanoparticle yield.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Cho T J, Pettibone J M, Gorham J M, Nguyen T M, MacCuspie R I, Gigault J et al 2015 Langmuir 31 767310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01634 ↗
2. Saha B, Evers T H and Prins M W J 2014 Anal. Chem. 86 815810.1021/ac501536z ↗
3. Billing B K, Agnihotri P K and Singh N 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 422610.1039/C7TC00984D ↗
4. Adams S M, Campione S, Caldwell J D, Bezares F J, Culbertson J C, Capolino F et al 2012 Small 8 223910.1002/smll.201102708 ↗
5. Orchard K L, Shaffer M S P and Williams C K 2012 Chem. Mater. 24 244310.1021/cm300058d ↗
6. Kim D S, Park M S and Jang J H 2011 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 740710.1166/jnn.2011.4821 ↗
7. Pooja, Barman P B and Hazra S K 2018 J. Cluster. Sci. 29 120910.1007/s10876-018-1438-7 ↗
8. Gupta D, Dutta D, Kumar M, Barman P B, Sarkar C K, Basu S et al 2014 Sens. Actuators B 196 21510.1016/j.snb.2014.01.106 ↗
9. Nehl C L, Liao H and Hafner J H 2006 Nano Lett. 6 68310.1021/nl052409y ↗
10. Tagliazucchi M, Blaber M G, Schatz G C, Weiss E A and Szleifer I 2012 ACS Nano. 6 839710.1021/nn303221y ↗
11. Yang D, Chen Y, Peng H, Chen G and Lin Z 2018 Nanoscale 10 2275010.1039/C8NR07115B ↗
12. Budijono S J, Russ B, Saad W, Adamson D H and Prud’homme R K 2010 Colloids Surf. A 360 10510.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.02.016 ↗
13. Calabrese I, Merli M and Liveri M L T 2015 Spectrochim. Acta A 142 15010.1016/j.saa.2014.12.095 ↗
14. Sung C S P, Pyun E and Sun H L 1986 Macromolecules 19 292210.1021/ma00166a008 ↗
15. Griffiths P C, Hirst N, Paul A, King S M, Heenan R K and Farley R 2004 Langmuir 20 690410.1021/la049348o ↗
16. Strasser P, Koh S, Anniyev T, Greeley J, More K, Yu C F et al 2010 Nat. Chem. 2 45410.1038/nchem.623 ↗
17. Gan L, Yu R, Luo J, Cheng Z and Zhu J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 93410.1021/jz300192b ↗
18. Walia S, Gupta R, Rao K D M and Kulkarni G U 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 2341910.1021/acsami.6b08275 ↗
19. Gupta R, Sagade A A and Kulkarni G U 2012 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 944310.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.010 ↗
20. Hassan K and Chung G S 2017 Sens. Actuators B 239 82410.1016/j.snb.2016.08.084 ↗
21. Teng J, Bates S, Engers D A, Leach K, Schields P and Yang Y 2010 J. Pharm. Sci. 99 381510.1002/jps.22204 ↗