journal article·2020-12

Theoretical examination of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on carbon nanocone (CNC) for fuel cells

Xiaomin Shang, Meng Sun, Mingxiao Jin, Xiaoqiu Liu, Meysam Najafi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Recently, various studies were performed to propose and discover acceptable catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in various fuel cells. Here, performance of boron-doped carbon nanocone (CNC) as catalyst to ORR via theoretical methods is examined. The ORR paths through ER and LH mechanisms were studied. Results showed that onset-potential and over-potential on ORR of boron–CNC were 0.73 and 0.50 V, respectively. The calculated exchange current density and transfer coefficient of B–CNC were ca. 6.5 $$\times $$ 10 $$-6$$ A cm $$-2$$ and 0.52, respectively. Results demonstrate that boron-doped CNC is a high-potential catalyst to ORR.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang Y, Li J and Wei Z 2018 ChemElectroChem5 176410.1002/celc.201701335 ↗
2. Callejas R, Diaz C A and Balbuena P B 2013 Electrochim. Acta101 32610.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.053 ↗
3. An W, Men Y, Wang J and Liu P 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C1 1215603
4. Garino N, Sacco A and Castellino M 2016 ChemistrySelect1 364010.1002/slct.201601037 ↗
5. Wei Y and Xu Q 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc.141 790610.1021/jacs.9b02417 ↗
6. Olsen R and Arnaldsson A 2004 J. Chem. Phys.121 977610.1063/1.1809574 ↗
7. Kishimoto T and Ozaki J 2017 Carbon116 59110.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.035 ↗
8. Zhang G P and Munoz M 2016 Angew. Chem.128 229810.1002/ange.201508338 ↗
9. Yang T, Yu Q and Wang H 2018 Catal. Lett.148 238210.1007/s10562-018-2412-6 ↗
10. Carbonell S, Artyushkova K and Serov A 2018 ACS Catal.8 304110.1021/acscatal.7b03991 ↗
11. Gao S, Wang M, Chen Y and Tian M 2018 Nano Energy45 2110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.021 ↗
12. Ni B, He P, Liao W and Chen S 2018 Small1 170374910.1002/smll.201703749 ↗
13. Li J, Xiao F, Zhong H and Li T 2019 ACS Catal.9 592910.1021/acscatal.9b00869 ↗
14. Datta S and Vegge T 2010 J. Chem. Phys.132 07110110.1063/1.3298994 ↗
15. Glasscott M W and Dick J E 2019 ACS Nano13 457210.1021/acsnano.9b00546 ↗
16. Wang H, Yin S, Li Y and Yu H 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A6 364210.1039/C7TA10342E ↗
17. Wei J and Feng J 2014 RSC Adv.4 5264010.1039/C4RA10746B ↗
18. Miyabayashi K, Ishihara K and Joshi P 2018 Electrocatalysis9 48610.1007/s12678-018-0462-6 ↗
19. Shen X, Zhang S, Wu Y and Chen Y 2019 ChemSusChem12 10410.1002/cssc.201802007 ↗
20. Xi X and Li D 2017 Nanoscale9 1891810.1039/C7NR06456J ↗
21. Wang S and Sun G 2014 ACS Catal.4 45710.1021/cs400938s ↗
22. Lopes P P and Strmcnik D 2016 Catal. Today262 4110.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.010 ↗
23. Lopes P P and Tripkovic D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C116 2223110.1021/jp3075783 ↗
24. Sallum L F, Lima A and Gonzalez E R 2019 Electrochim. Acta293 110.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.118 ↗
25. Schuhmann W and Xia W 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C117 2428310.1021/jp4059438 ↗
26. Tan Q and Wang G 2017 J. Catal.347 10210.1016/j.jcat.2017.01.008 ↗
27. Yang N, Li L, Li J and Ding W 2018 Chem. Sci.9 579510.1039/C8SC01801D ↗
28. Panov G I and Starokon E V 2018 ACS Catal.8 117310.1021/acscatal.7b03833 ↗
29. Li Y and Liu Z 2017 Appl. Sur. Sci.393 21210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.028 ↗
30. Geng D and Ding G 2015 J. Mater. Chem. A3 179510.1039/C4TA06008C ↗
31. Liu J, Yin J, Feng B, Li F and Wang F 2019 J. Appl. Surf. Sci.473 31810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.072 ↗
32. Nørskov J K 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B108 1788610.1021/jp047349j ↗
33. Tritsaris G A 2011 Electrochim. Acta56 978310.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.045 ↗
34. Si C 2016 Nano Energy23 10510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.012 ↗
35. Duan H 2011 J. Power Sources316 10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.076 ↗