journal article·2019-08

Electrical, mechanical and dynamic properties of ternary composites from acrylonitrile butadiene rubber and conductive fillers

Abdullah G Al-Sehemi, Ahmed A Al-Ghamdi, Nikolay T Dishovsky, Petrunka A Malinova, Nikolay T Atanasov, Gabriela L Atanasova

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents comparative investigations on dual and ternary composites based on nitrile butadiene rubber. These composites were filled with carbon black and nickel powder at various ratios with each filler or with a combination of both. The focus of this study is on the electrical, mechanical and dynamic properties of the materials as influenced by the loading rate, applied pressure and bending degree have on the specific volume electrical resistivity. The investigations of the dynamic properties view the effect that the amount and chemical nature of the fillers have on the storage modulus and the tangent of the mechanical loss angle. It has been established that the specific characteristics of each of the fillers (particle size, specific surface, tendency to aggregate and agglomerate, interaction with the elastomeric matrix) have the greatest impact on composite properties. Scanning electron microscopy studies of the fillers and composites also confirm the results obtained.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Dielectric materials and actuators · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Das N C, Khastgir D, Chaki T K and Chakraborty A 2000 Composites 31 106910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00064-6 ↗
2. Feller J F, Chauvelon P, Linossier I and Glouannec P 2003 Polym. Test 22 83110.1016/S0142-9418(03)00020-5 ↗
3. Job A E, Oliveira F A, Alves N, Giacometti J A and Mattoso L H C 2003 Synth. Met. 135–136 9910.1016/S0379-6779(02)00866-4 ↗
4. Mahmoud W E, El-Lawindy A M Y, El Eraki M H and Hassan H H 2007 Sens. Actuator A Phys. 136 22910.1016/j.sna.2006.11.017 ↗
5. El Eraki M H, El-Lawindy A M Y, Hassan H H and Mahmoud W E 2006 Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 91 141710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.10.009 ↗
6. Nasr G M, Osman H M, Abu-Abdeen M and Aboud A I 1999 Polym. Test 18 48310.1016/S0142-9418(98)00035-X ↗
7. Sasikumar K, Suresh G, Thomas K A, John R, Natarajan V, Mukundav T et al 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 63710.1007/s12034-006-0016-z ↗
8. Yacubowicz Y and Narkis M 1990 Polym. Eng. Sci. 30 45910.1002/pen.760300806 ↗
9. Thongruang W, Ritthichaiwong C, Bunnaul P, Smithmaitrie P and Chetpattananondh K 2008 Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 30 361
10. Shaw M T and MacKnight W J 2005 Introduction to polymer viscoelasticity (New York: Wiley)10.1002/0471741833 ↗
11. Angellier H, Molina-Boisseau S and Dufresne A 2005 Macromolecules 38 916110.1021/ma0512399 ↗
12. Donnet J-B and Custodero E 2013 in The science and technology of rubber (4th edition) J E Mark, B Erman and C M Roland (eds) (Boston: Academic Press) p 38310.1016/B978-0-12-394584-6.00008-X ↗
13. Martens J E, Terrill E R, Lewis J T, Pazur R J and Hoffman R 2013 Rubber World 248 29