journal article·2019-04

Effects of doping $$\hbox {Pr}3+$$ Pr 3 + and $$\hbox {Gd}3+$$ Gd 3 + into YAG:Ce phosphors on the luminescence properties

Shihong Tong

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

A series of ((hbox {Y}0.98-x-yhbox {Ce}0.02hbox {Pr}xhbox {Gd}y)3hbox {Al}5hbox {O}12) ((x=0{-}0.02), (y=0,,0.3)) phosphors were prepared by a modified co-precipitation method. The phases, luminescence properties, effect of calcination temperature on luminescence properties and energy transfer (ET) were investigated. The results indicated that the doping of (hbox {Pr}3+) and (hbox {Gd}3+) in all samples did not produce any new phases but caused a slight lattice expansion. The series of ((hbox {Y}0.98-xhbox {Ce}0.02hbox {Pr}x)3hbox {Al}5hbox {O}12) phosphors emit additional red light at 612 nm, and when (x=0.005), the red/yellow ratio of the emission spectrum is the largest. Compared with the ((hbox {Y}0.975hbox {Ce}0.02hbox {Pr}0.005)3hbox {Al}5hbox {O}12) phosphor, continued doping 30 at% (hbox {Gd}3+) in the ((hbox {Y}0.675hbox {Ce}0.02hbox {Pr}0.005hbox {Gd}0.3)3hbox {Al}5hbox {O}12) sample makes the peak wavelength of yellow light emission shift from 533 to 561 nm. Doping (hbox {Pr}3+) and (hbox {Gd}3+) results in the decrease of integrated emission intensity, but the emission intensity and the red/yellow ratio can be increased by raising the calcination temperature. In addition, there is only the ET from (hbox {Ce}3+) to (hbox {Pr}3+) in the ((hbox {Y}0.675hbox {Ce}0.02hbox {Pr}0.005hbox {Gd}0.3)3hbox {Al}5hbox {O}12) sample.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Pan Y X, Wu M M and Su Q 2004 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 65 84510.1016/j.jpcs.2003.08.018 ↗
2. Schubert E F and Kim J K 2005 Science 308 127410.1126/science.1108712 ↗
3. Nishiura S, Tanabe S, Fujioka K and Fujimoto Y 2011 Opt. Mater. 33 68810.1016/j.optmat.2010.06.005 ↗
4. Jung H C, Park J Y, Seeta Rama Raju G, Choi B C, Jeong J H and Moon B K 2011 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 55110.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04130.x ↗
5. Ye S, Xiao F, Pan Y X, Ma Y Y and Zhang Q Y 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 71 110.1016/j.mser.2010.07.001 ↗
6. Schlotter P, Schmidt R and Schneider J 1997 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process 64 41710.1007/s003390050498 ↗
7. Nakamura S, Senoh M, Iwasa N and Nagahama S 1995 Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 186810.1063/1.114359 ↗
8. Mueller-Mach R, Mueller G O, Krames M R and Trottier T 2002 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8 33910.1109/2944.999189 ↗
9. Huh Y D, Cho Y S and Do Y R 2002 Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 23 143510.5012/bkcs.2002.23.10.1435 ↗
10. Jang H S, Im W B, Lee D C, Jeon D Y and Kim S S 2007 J. Lumin. 126 37110.1016/j.jlumin.2006.08.093 ↗
11. Kottaisamy M, Thiyagarajan P, Mishra J and Ramachandra Rao M S 2008 Mater. Res. Bull. 43 165710.1016/j.materresbull.2007.09.005 ↗
12. Shi H, Zhu C, Huang J et al 2014 Opt. Mater. Express 4 64910.1364/OME.4.000649 ↗
13. Shao Q Y, Li H J, Dong Y et al 2010 J. Alloy. Compd. 498 19910.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.159 ↗
14. Lin Y S, Liu R S and Cheng B M 2005 J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 J4110.1149/1.1896307 ↗
15. Chawla S, Roy T, Majumder K and Yadav A 2014 J. Exp. Nanosci. 9 77610.1080/17458080.2012.714481 ↗
16. Wang L, Zhang X, Hao Z D et al 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 09351510.1063/1.3500458 ↗
17. Tong S H, Zhao J Y and Wen X 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 110.1007/s12034-016-1290-z ↗
18. Rack P D and Holloway P H 1998 Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 21 17110.1016/S0927-796X(97)00010-7 ↗