journal article·2021-09

A continuum damage-based computational methodology for crack growth simulation of metal films

Bin Sun, Zhao-dong Xu

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

To simulate the crack growth and study the catastrophic fracture mechanisms of metal films, a computational methodology is developed to simulate the failure process from damage initiation to crack growth and eventually to rupture. In the computational methodology, a procedure is developed based on beam lattice model for considering the coupling interactions among damage and crack evolution. To verify the effectiveness of the developed computational methodology, fracture process of two copper film specimens were simulated and compared with the corresponding experimental results. The results show that the developed methodology is effective, and can be used to simulate the catastrophic fracture process of metal films. From the simulation results, we can find out that the fracture of metal films with initial flaws belongs to brittle fracture, and the regular lattice model can affect the crack path prediction, and random and irregular lattice model is more suitable to simulate crack growth in the developed computational methodology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. LaVan D A, Boyce B L and Buchheit T E 2003 Int. J. Damage Mech. 12 35710.1177/105678903036226 ↗
2. Kivi A R, Azizi S and Khalkhali A 2016 Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 12 33710.1007/s10999-015-9310-5 ↗
3. Li Y, Li J and Xu L 2018 Microelectron. Reliab. 85 3810.1016/j.microrel.2018.03.041 ↗
4. Gao J, Chow P K, Thomas A V, Lu T M, Borca-Tasciuc T and Koratkar N 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 722
5. Sun B and Li Z 2019 Acta Mech. 230 297910.1007/s00707-019-02449-0 ↗
6. Sun B and Li Z 2019 Eur. J. Mech. A: Solid 75 8210.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.01.014 ↗
7. Rogers J A 2010 Nature 468 17710.1038/468177a ↗
8. Heremans P, Tripathi A K, De Meux A D J, Smits E C P, Hou B, Pourtois G et al 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 426610.1002/adma.201504360 ↗
9. Sun B, Huang X and Li Z 2019 Met. Mater. Int. 26 50110.1007/s12540-019-00351-x ↗
10. Sun Y, Zhai Z, Tian S and Chen X 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 480 110010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.010 ↗
11. He X, Chen F and Yin H 2016 Int. J. Damage Mech. 71 423358
12. Li X, Wei Y, Lu L, Lu K and Gao H 2010 Nature 464 87710.1038/nature08929 ↗
13. You Z S, Li X, Gui L, Lu Q, Zhu T, Gao H et al 2013 Acta Mater. 61 21710.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.052 ↗
14. Su Y, Wang S, Huang Y A, Luan H, Dong W, Fan J A et al 2015 Small 11 36710.1002/smll.201401181 ↗
15. Bastawros A F and Kim K S 2001 Int. J. Damage Mech. 10 19510.1106/QPAC-FG22-RFX5-A1QP ↗
16. An B and Xu M 2019 Mech. Mater. 136 10308410.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103084 ↗
17. Zeng Z, Li X, Lu L and Zhu T 2015 Acta Mater. 98 31310.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.055 ↗
18. Shan Z, Lu L, Minor A M, Stach E A and Mao S X 2008 JOM-US 60 7110.1007/s11837-008-0122-z ↗
19. Kim S, Li X, Gao H and Kumar S 2012 Acta Mater. 60 295910.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.002 ↗
20. Hintsala E, Kiener D, Jackson J and Gerberich W W 2015 Exp. Mech. 55 168110.1007/s11340-015-0069-2 ↗
21. Singh A, Tang L, Dao M, Lu L and Suresh S 2011 Acta Mater. 59 243710.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.043 ↗
22. You Z S, Qu S, Luo S and Lu L 2019 Materialia 7 10043010.1016/j.mtla.2019.100430 ↗
23. Yu S, Zhang X, Xiao X, Zhou H and Chen M 2015 Soft Matter 11 220310.1039/C5SM00105F ↗
24. An B 2019 Eur. J. Mech. A: Solid 75 110.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.01.005 ↗
25. Sadhukhan S, Kumar A, Kulkarni G U, Tarafdar S and Dutta T 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 42 19710.1007/s12034-019-1826-0 ↗
26. Yun K, Wang Z, Chang M, Liu J, Kim T, Son N et al 2019 Comput. Struct. 215 6510.1016/j.compstruc.2019.02.003 ↗
27. Sun B, Wang X and Li Z 2015 Comput. Mater. Sci. 110 3910.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.050 ↗
28. Amor H, Marigo J and Maurini C 2009 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 57 120910.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
29. Sun B and Li Z 2016 Int. J. Damage Mech. 25 75010.1177/1056789516648371 ↗
30. Miehe C, Hofacker M and Welschinger F 2010 Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 276510.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
31. Borden M J, Verhoosel C V, Scott M A, Hughes T J R and Landis C M 2012 Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 217 7710.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
32. Nguyen T T, Yvonnet J, Zhu Q, Bornert M and Chateau C 2015 Eng. Fract. Mech. 139 1810.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.03.045 ↗
33. Erdogan F and Sih G C 1963 J. Basic Eng. 85 51910.1115/1.3656897 ↗
34. Sih G C 1974 Int. J. Fract. 10 30510.1007/BF00035493 ↗
35. Nuismer R J 1975 Int. J. Fract. 11 24510.1007/BF00038891 ↗
36. Azadi H and Khoei A R 2011 Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 85 101710.1002/nme.3002 ↗
37. Belytschko T, Chen H, Xu J and Zi G 2003 Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 58 187310.1002/nme.941 ↗
38. Alfaiate J, Wells G N and Sluys L J 2002 Eng. Fract. Mech. 69 66110.1016/S0013-7944(01)00108-4 ↗
39. Bai Y L, Wang H, Xia M and Ke F 2005 Appl. Mech. Rev. 58 37210.1115/1.2048654 ↗
40. Sun B and Li Z 2015 Comput. Struct. 152 6610.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.015 ↗
41. Sun B, Zheng Y and Li Z 2020 Constr. Build. Mater. 244 11839610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118396 ↗
42. Sun B 2020 Arab. J. Geosci. 13 103110.1007/s12517-020-06036-9 ↗