Impurity mechanism of monocrystalline silicon PERC solar cells stimulated by prelight-induced degradation
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the monocrystalline silicon (mono-Si)-passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) solar cells have achieved incredible efficiency, they still can be further improved by hydrogenation. So the hydrogenation was performed to investigate the improvement of large area (>240 cm2) mono-Si PERC solar cells and estimate the significance of previous light-induced degradation (pre-LID) under a high-intensity infrared (HI-IR) LEDs source platform. Then, the results indicated that the parameters, such as open-circuit voltage (Uoc) and short-circuit current density (Jsc) and fill factor (FF), could be better improved after LED hydrogenation with the execution of the pre-LID. The efficiency of mono-Si PERC solar cells with pre-LID increased by ~0.190 ± 0.005%abs. for 2 min, which was higher than that without pre-LID (0.115 ± 0.005%abs.). Moreover, the results showed that the efficiency of large area mono-Si PERC solar cells with light-induced degradation (LID) treatment after LED hydrogenation only existed a slight degradation of about −0.253 ± 0.005%rel.. Compared with mono-Si PERC solar cells without pre-LID, the efficiency improvement and LID mitigation of mono-Si solar cells with pre-LID was faster and more significant by LED hydrogenation, so that the LED hydrogenation time significantly can shorten from 6 to 2 min. Additionally, the possible presence of a boron-oxygen (BO) model was estimated, and this BO model is susceptible to be activated by the injection of external energy, resulting in more BO defects in the process of pre-LID, so that subsequent hydrogenation rate becomes faster.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Hashigami H, Yu I and Saitoh T 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 424010.1063/1.1559430 ↗
2. Bothe K, Hezel R and Schmidt J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 112510.1063/1.1600837 ↗
3. Voronkov V and Falster R 2016 Phys. Status Solidi 253 172110.1002/pssb.201600082 ↗
4. Knobloch J, Glunz S, Biro D, Warta W, Schaffer E and Wettling W 1996 In Proceedings 25th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference p 405
5. Schmidt J, Aberle A G and Hezel R 1997 In Proceedings 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 47 p 13
6. Wilking S, Beckh C, Ebert S, Herguth A and Hahn G 2014 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 131 210.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.027 ↗
7. Glunz S W, Rein S, Warta W, Knobloch J and Wettling W 2001 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 65 21910.1016/S0927-0248(00)00098-2 ↗
8. Hallam B, Herguth A, Hamer P, Nampalli N, Wilking S, Abbott M et al 2017 Appl. Sci. 8 1010.3390/app8010010 ↗
9. Hallam B, Sugianto A, Mai L, Xu G Q, Chan C, Abbott M et al 2014 IEEE J. Photovolt. 4 141310.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2347804 ↗
10. Hallam B, Wenham S R, Hamer P G, Abbott M D, Sugianto A, Chan C E et al 2013 Energy Proc. 38 56110.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.317 ↗
11. Hallam B, Abbott M, Bilbao J, Hamer P, Gorman N, Kim M et al 2016 Energy Proc. 92 4210.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.008 ↗
12. Kraiem J, Drevet B, Cocco F, Enjalbert N, Dubois S, Camel D et al 2010 In Proceedings 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 12 1427
13. Ji Y L, Peters S, Rein S and Glunz S W 2010 Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 9 417
14. Rougieux F E, Lim B, Schmidt J, Forster M, Macdonald D and Cuevas A 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 09350510.1063/1.3633492 ↗
15. Hallam B J, Hamer P G, Wenham S R, Abbott M D, Sugianto A, Wenham A M et al 2013 IEEE J. Photovolt. 4 8810.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2281732 ↗
16. Hamer P, Wang S, Hallam B, Wenham S, Chong C M, Wenham A et al 2015 Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)-Rapid Res. Lett. 9 11110.1002/pssr.201409495 ↗
17. Hamer P, Hallam B, Wenham S and Abbott M 2014 IEEE J. Photovolt. 4 125210.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2339494 ↗
18. Song L, Wenham A, Wang S, Hamer P, Ahmmed M S, Hallam B et al 2015 Int. J. Photoenergy 2015 110.1155/2015/193892 ↗
19. Herring C, Johnson N M and Van de W C G 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 12520910.1103/PhysRevB.64.125209 ↗
20. Lim B, Rougieux F, Macdonald D, Bothe K and Schmidt J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 1
21. Hallam B, Chan C, Abbott M and Wenham S 2015 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 141 12510.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.009 ↗
22. Hamer P, Hallam B, Abbott M and Wenham S 2015 Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)-Rapid Res. Lett. 9 29710.1002/pssr.201510064 ↗
23. Walter D C, Falster R, Voronkov V V and Schmidt J 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 173 3310.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.036 ↗
24. Krugel G, Wolke W, Geilker J, Rein S and Preu R 2011 Energy Proc. 8 4710.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.100 ↗
25. Shao J, Xi X, Li C, Liu G, Li G, Zhu Y et al 2018 J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 10 01350710.1063/1.5012781 ↗
26. Aberle A G 2001 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 65 23910.1016/S0927-0248(00)00099-4 ↗
27. Xi X, Shao J, Li C, Liu G, Li G, Zhu Y et al 2017 J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 9 05350210.1063/1.4994578 ↗
28. Li C, Shao J, Xi X, Liu G, Li G, Zhu Y et al 2018 Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 12 322
29. Shao J, Xi X, Li S, Liu G, Peng R, Li C et al 2019 Opt. Commun. 450 25210.1016/j.optcom.2019.06.011 ↗
30. Wilking S, Ebert S, Herguth A and Hahn G 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 19451210.1063/1.4833243 ↗
31. Schmidt J and Bothe K 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 02410710.1103/PhysRevB.69.024107 ↗
32. Palmer D, Karsten B and Schmidt J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 035201
33. Voronkov V and Falster R 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 05350910.1063/1.3309869 ↗
34. Carvalho A, Santos P, Coutinho J, Jones R, Rayson M and Briddon P 2012 Phys. Status Solidi (a) 209 189410.1002/pssa.201200196 ↗
35. Chen X, Yu X, Zhu X, Chen P and Yang D 2013 Appl. Phys. Exp. 6 04130110.7567/APEX.6.041301 ↗
36. Chen P, Yu X, Liu X, Chen X, Wu Y and Yang D 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 1
37. Chen P, Yu X, Wu Y, Zhao J and Yang D 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 537
38. Schmidt J and Cuevas A 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 86 317510.1063/1.371186 ↗