Effect of Au/SiO2 substrate on the structural and optical properties of gallium nitride grown by CVD
Source abstract
Abstract
The improvement of the growth of thick GaN films using a fused silica wafer covered with a thin gold layer by chemical vapour deposition at 800 ∘C is reported. In order to compare the surface properties, crystalline quality, micromilling performance and luminescence, the characterization of a GaN film grown on a silicon wafer is presented as well. The different morphologies of the surface observed on the GaN films are compared on each substrate and the resulting microstructures are presented in detail. High resolution TEM images of the GaN films show the main crystallographic planes characterizing these structures. The wurtzite structure was determined for each sample using the substrates of Au/SiO2 and Si (100) from the XRD patterns. Also, the re-deposition effect after ion milling of the GaN films is reported. The performance of ionic beam on the surface of the GaN thick films for the geometries patterning of rectangular, circular and annular with two different ion doses was compared. Cathodoluminescence spectra showed that the top surfaces of the samples emit strong UV emissions peaked at 3·35 and 3·32 eV which are related to the Y 4 and Y 6 transitions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Chang-Ju L, Young-Jin K, Chul-Ho W, Jung-Lee L and Sung-Ho H 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 11111010.1063/1.4821133 ↗
2. Chen R, Zhou W and Sing-Kwok H 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 02211110.1063/1.3676447 ↗
3. Chul-Woo L, Sung-Taek K, Ki-Soo L, Kasi Viswanath A, Joo In L, Hyung Gyo L, Gye Mo Y and Kee Young L 1999 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 35 280
4. Dong Y, Tian B, Kempa T J and Lieber C M 2009 Nano Lett. 9 218310.1021/nl900858v ↗
5. Fang Z and Kang J 2007 J. Phys. Chem. 111 7889
6. Garcia R, Thomas A C and Ponce F A 2008 J. Cryst. Growth 310 313110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.03.030 ↗
7. Hersee S D, Sun X and Wang X 2006 Nano Lett. 6 180810.1021/nl060553t ↗
8. Hughes W C, Rowland W H, Johnson M A L Jr, Fujita S, Cook J W Jr, Schetzina J F, Ren J and Edmond J A 1995 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 157110.1116/1.588189 ↗
9. Hwa-Mok K, Yong-Hoon C, Hosang L, Suk II K, Sung-Ryong R, Deuk-Young K, Tae-Won K and Kwan-Soo C 2004 Nano Lett. 4 105910.1021/nl049615a ↗
10. Liu L and Edgar J H 2002 Mater. Sci. Eng. R 37 6110.1016/S0927-796X(02)00008-6 ↗
11. Martínez-Criado G, Cros A, Cantarero A, Dimitrov R, Ambacher O and Stutzmann M 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 88 347010.1063/1.1289794 ↗
12. Li D B, Nakamura K, Miyake H, Hiramatsu K, Kobayashi M and Kikuta S 2006 Phys. Status Solid. 8 2750
13. Ramos-Carrazco A, Garcia R, Barboza-Flores M and Rangel R 2013. Bull. Mater. Sci. (in press)
14. Richter T, Lüth H, Meijers R, Calarco R and Marso M 2008 Nano Lett. 8 305610.1021/nl8014395 ↗
15. Sobanska M, Klosek K, Zytkiewicz Z R, Borysiuk J, Witkowski B S, Lusakowska E, Reszka A and Jakiela R 2012 Cryst. Res. Technol. 47 30710.1002/crat.201100408 ↗
16. Sun G, Ding Y J, Liu G, Huang G S and Zhao H 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 02190410.1063/1.3462324 ↗
17. Thillosen N, Sebald K, Hardtdegen H, Meijers R, Calarco R, Montanari S, Kaluza N, Gutowski J and Lüth H 2006 Nano Lett. 6 70410.1021/nl052456q ↗