Formation of oxygen related donors in step-annealed CZ-silicon
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of step-annealing necessitated by the difficulties being faced in the long duration annealing treatments to be given to CZ-silicon has been studied. One pre-anneal of 10 h followed by annealing of 10 h causes a decrease in the absorption coefficient for carbon (αc). Oxygen and carbon both accelerate thermal donor (TD) formation process but oxygen plays a dominating role. Three anneals of 10 h each followed by one anneal of 10 h support the view that carbon suppresses the donor formation. The absorption coefficient for carbon decreases after a few number of step-anneals resulting in the transformation of TD to new donor (ND) as brought about by annealing at temperature, > 500°C. It is quite logical to conclude that step-annealing may bring about the same results as obtained on continuous annealing for a longer duration. The results have been fully supported by proper interpretation in the light of existing theories.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM Standard F123 1988Annual book of ASTM standards (Philadelphia: Am. Soc. Test. Mat.) p. 179
2. Babitskii Yu M, Vasil’eva M V, Grinshtein P M, Il’in M A and Remizov O A 1991Sov. Phys.-Semicond. 25 507
3. Bean A R and Newman R C 1972J. Phys. Chem. Solids 33 25510.1016/0022-3697(72)90004-2 ↗
4. Capper P, Jones A W, Wallhouse E J and Wilkes J C 1977J. Appl. Phys. 48 164610.1063/1.323847 ↗
5. Cazacarra V and Zunino P 1980J. Appl. Phys. 51 420610.1063/1.328278 ↗
6. Fukuoka N, Yoneta M, Miyamura R and Saito H 1987Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 26 19710.1143/JJAP.26.197 ↗
7. Gosele U and Tan T Y 1982Appl. Phys. A28 7910.1007/BF00617135 ↗
8. Iizuka T, Takasu S, Tajima M, Aria T, Najaki T, Inoue N andWatanake M 1985J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 170710.1149/1.2114196 ↗
9. Kumar Tarun and Singh S 1994Bull. Electrochem. 10 518
10. Mathiot D 1987Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 90410.1063/1.98796 ↗
11. McQuaid S A, Binns M J, Londos C A, Tucker J H, Brown A R and Newman R C 1995J. Appl. Phys. 77 142710.1063/1.358890 ↗
12. Newman R C 1985J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 18 96710.1088/0022-3719/18/30/001 ↗
13. Oehrlein G S, Lindstrom J L and Cohen S A 1984Proc. int.conf. defects in semiconductors (eds) L C Kimerling and J M Parsey Jr (Coronado: Metallurgical Society of AIME)p. 701
14. Ourmazd A, Schroter W and Bourret A 1984J. Appl. Phys. 56167010.1063/1.334156 ↗
15. Prakash Om and Singh S 1995Indian J. Phys. A69 509
16. Prakash Om and Singh S 1997Solid State Phenomena 55 12010.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.55.123 ↗
17. Prakash Om,Upreti N K and Singh S 1998Mater. Sci. and Engg. B52 18010.1016/S0921-5107(97)00280-8 ↗
18. Regolini J L,Stoquert J P, Ganter C and Siffert P 1986J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 216510.1149/1.2108362 ↗
19. Reiche M, Reichel J and Nitzche W 1988Phys. Status Solidi A107 85110.1002/pssa.2211070240 ↗
20. Sze S M and Irvin J C 1968Solid State Electron. 11 59910.1016/0038-1101(68)90012-9 ↗