Deterioration of hydrogen-bonded superprotonic conductors belonging to CsHSO4–CsH2PO4–H2O salt system: a single-crystal neutron diffraction investigation
Source abstract
Abstract
Single-crystal neutron diffraction investigation on Cs4(HSO4)3(H2PO4) and Cs6H(HSO4)3(H2PO4)4 superprotonic crystals, belonging to CsHSO4–CsH2PO4–H2O salt system, is under taken to elucidate the precise hydrogen atom positions in these crystals. The investigation revealed that these crystals are very sensitive to the ambient conditions and can undergo deterioration due to fluctuation in air moisture content. Cs6H(HSO4)3(H2PO4)4 crystals are more stable as compared to Cs4(HSO4)3(H2PO4). Crystal structure of Cs6H(HSO4)3(H2PO4)4 is obtained both before and after deterioration, it is found that the asymmetric O–HO hydrogen bond between the PO4 and SO4 ions of this crystal becomes stronger after deterioration. This led to the shrinkage of the unit cell, and most likely prevented further deterioration. Diabatic state model for hydrogen bonds is used to obtain the energy contour for the O–H···O hydrogen bond of Cs6H(HSO4)3(H2PO4)4 crystal. The influence of this change in the hydrogen bonding on the proton conduction ability of the crystal is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Crystallography and molecular interactions · Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Baranov AI 2003 Crystallogr. Rep. 48 101210.1134/1.1627443 ↗
2. Makarova IP 2015 Phys. Solid State 57 44210.1134/S1063783415030117 ↗
3. Norby T 2001 Nature 410 87710.1038/35073718 ↗
4. Fitzgerald R 2001 Phys. Today 54 2210.1063/1.1397388 ↗
5. Varga A, Brunelli N A and Louie M W 2010 J. Mater. Chem. 20 630910.1039/c0jm00216j ↗
6. Makarova I P, Grebenev V, Dmitricheva E, Vasil’ev A, Komornikov V, Dolbinina V et al 2016 Acta Cryst. B72 133
7. Makarova I P, Grebenev V V, Komornikov V A and Selezneva E V 2016 Crystallogr. Rep. 61 91810.1134/S1063774516060079 ↗
8. Komornikov V A, Grebenev V V, Makarova I P, Selezneva E V and Andreev P V 2016 Crystallogr. Rep. 61 66510.1134/S1063774516040106 ↗
9. Srikanta S 1968 Personal communication
10. Sheldrick G M 2008 Acta Cryst. A64 11210.1107/S0108767307043930 ↗
11. Srikanta S and Sequeira A 1968 Personal communication
12. Gallagher P K 1976 Thermochim. Acta 14 13110.1016/0040-6031(76)80062-7 ↗
13. Taninouchi Yu-ki, Uda T, Awakura Y, Ikeda A and Sossina M H 2007 J. Mater. Chem. 17 318210.1039/b704558c ↗
14. Osterheld R K and Markowitz M 1956 J. Phys. Chem. 60 86310.1021/j150541a007 ↗
15. Uesu Y and Kobayashi J 1976 Phys. Status Solidi A 34 47510.1002/pssa.2210340207 ↗
16. Makarova I P, Chernaya T S, Filaretov A A, Vasil’ev A L, Verin I A, Grebenev V V et al 2010 Crystallogr. Rep. 55 39310.1134/S1063774510030065 ↗
17. Gilli G and Gilli P 2009 The Nature of the hydrogen bond. outline of a comprehensive hydrogen bond theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558964.001.0001 ↗
18. McKenzie R H, Bekker C, Athokpamand B and Ramesh S G 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 17450810.1063/1.4873352 ↗
19. Athokpam B, Ramesh S G and McKenzie R H 2017 Chem. Phys. 488–489 4310.1016/j.chemphys.2017.03.006 ↗
20. Halpern A M, Ramachandran B R and Glendening E D 2007 J. Chem. Ed. 84 106710.1021/ed084p1067 ↗