journal article·2012-10

Phase transitions in coated nickel titanium arch wires: A differential scanning calorimetric and X-ray diffraction analysis

MANU KRISHNAN, S SEEMA, K SUKUMARAN, VASANT PAWAR

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Shape memory and super-elastic properties of orthodontic nickel titanium wires, which are crucial for its clinical performance are dependent on the austenitic–martensitic phase transitions in its metallic microstructure that happen as a result of temperature or stress. The objective of this study was to compare the austenitic–martensitic phase transitions in new, black oxide coated nickel titanium (0·016 inch, Black Diamond, NiTi) arch wires in the ‘as-received’ form, from the manufacturer and ‘retrieved form’ after two months of intraoral use. This was done to analyse whether the new oxide coated nickel titanium wires suffered any significant loss in shape memory and super elasticity properties at the end of two months of intra oral use, findings of which could give valuable inferences prior to its widespread application in clinical practice. Five arch wire samples in both groups were investigated for their austenitic–martensitic phase transitions in an in vitro set up, using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), (−90° to 100°C at a rate of 10°C/min) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (10° to 90°), as a function of temperature. Martensitic–austenitic thermograms showed an intermediate rhombohedral phase in the heating cycle of both groups, but cooling cycles showed direct reversal from austenitic to martensitic phase. Lower austenitic start ( $A_{\rm \textbf{s}}$ = 10·78 ± 0·46°C) and finish ( $ {A}_{\rm \textbf{f}}$ = 22·26 ± 0·24°C) temperatures of coated wires compared to the conventional wires showed (i) ability of the wire to remain in austenitic phase below oral temperature, that permits it to take up greater force during activation, (ii) increased springiness and (iii) consistent force delivery for an extended period of time. Statistical analysis with paired Student’s ‘t’ test did not show any significant difference in mean values of transition temperatures and enthalpies between the two groups which proved similar shape memory and super-elastic properties at the end of intra oral use. Black oxide coating of NiTi wires may, therefore, be effective in diversified oral conditions and may find acceptable for re-use after sterilization. Low enthalpy values (0·92–3·59 j/g) compared to conventional ones, implied complete phase transition at the atomic level that can improve performance of the material in activation and deactivation cycles of NiTi wires. X-ray diffraction analysis of the two groups demonstrated predominance of austenitic phases (A, 110, 220 and 211) with complete reversibility at the atomic level. Discrete crystallographic structure and absence of multiple phases showed complete martensitic–austenitic transition, which authenticated the differential scanning calorimetric findings. This can earn acceptance for the new product in contemporary orthodontic practice with adequate scope for indigenization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Andreasen G F and Hilleman T B 1971 J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 82 137310.14219/jada.archive.1971.0209 ↗
2. Biermann M C, Berzins D W and Bradley T G 2007 Angle Orthod. 77 49910.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0499:TAOAAC]2.0.CO;2 ↗
3. Bradley T G, Brantley W A and Culbertson B M 1996 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 109 58910.1016/S0889-5406(96)70070-7 ↗
4. Bradley T G, Maslowski M J, Toth J M and Monaghan P 2003 J. Dent. Res. 82 1538
5. Brantley W A, Svec T A, Iijima M, Powers J M and Grentzer T H 2002 J. Endod. 28 77410.1097/00004770-200211000-00007 ↗
6. Brantley W A, Iijima M and Grentzer T H 2003 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 124 38710.1016/S0889-5406(03)00570-5 ↗
7. Burstone C J, Qin B and Morton J Y 1985 Am. J. Orthod. 87 44510.1016/0002-9416(85)90083-1 ↗
8. Chen R, Zhi Y F and Arvystas M G 1992 Angle Orthod. 62 59
9. Fariabi S, Thoma P E and Abujudom D N 1989 Proc. ICOMAT 565 56
10. Fischer-Brandis H et al 2003 J. Orofac. Orthop. 64 8810.1007/s00056-003-0062-8 ↗
11. Husmann P, Bourauel C, Wessinger M and Jager A 2002 J. Orofac. Orthop. 3 19910.1007/s00056-002-0009-5 ↗
12. Ijima M, Ohno H H, Kawashima I, Endo K and Mizoguchi I 2002 Dent. Mater. 18 8810.1016/S0109-5641(01)00025-2 ↗
13. Khier S E, Brantley W A and Fournelle R A 1991 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 99 31010.1016/0889-5406(91)70013-M ↗
14. Krishnan M 2007 Proc. IUMRS-ICAM 24 20
15. Kusy R P and Wilson T W 1990 Dent. Mater. 6 22810.1016/S0109-5641(05)80003-X ↗
16. Kusy R P and Whitley J Q 2007 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 131 22910.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.054 ↗
17. Leu L, Fournelle R, Brantley W and Ehlert T 1990 J. Dent. Res. 69 313
18. Mallory D C et al 2003 J. Dent. Res. 82 1536
19. Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y and Hamanaka H 1986 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 90 110.1016/0889-5406(86)90021-1 ↗
20. Sakima M T, Dalstra M and Melsen B 2006 Eur. J. Orthod. 28 28210.1093/ejo/cji079 ↗
21. Thayer T A, Bagby M D, Moore R N and De Angelis R J 1993 J. Dent. Res. 72 139
22. Thayer T A, Bagby M D, Moore R N and De Angelis R J 1995 Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 107 60410.1016/S0889-5406(95)70103-6 ↗
23. Todoroki T and Tamura H 1987 Trans. Jpn. Inst. Metals 28 8310.2320/matertrans1960.28.83 ↗
24. Yoneyama T et al 1992 Dent. Mater. J. 11 110.4012/dmj.11.1 ↗