journal article·2024-01-17

A Si-activated Ca9AlP7O28 nanostructure: synthesis and thermoluminescence characteristics

I A El-Mesady, S A Alawsh, A Hussein, H El-Samman, H A Othman

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Thermoluminescence (TL) response of newly synthetic silicon-activated Ca9AlP7O28 nanophosphor doped with different concentrations (0.3–10 mol%) (abbreviated as CAP: Six) were prepared by the sol–gel method. The optimum concentration of Si ions for the best TL response was found to be 0.3 mol% (CAP: Si0.3), which was selected for subsequent dosimetric measurements. Phase purity and the crystal structure of the CAP: Si0.3 sample were identified and verified using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, where results obtained confirmed the successful synthetic method used in the preparation of the nanophosphor samples. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping revealed the localization of constituent elements and indicated the homogeneous distribution of Si-ions as well as the feasibility of dopants in the herein sample. The dosimetric properties of the CAP: Si0.3 sample, including glow curve structure, reproducibility, repeatability, dose–response and fading effect, were extensively investigated. The gamma irradiated CAP: Si0.3 sample exhibited a simple glow curve of a single prominent peak centred at 222 ± 1.33°C with considerably high TL intensity (1.22 relative to MTS-700 TLD detector). The relative standard deviation (RSD) of peak areas of CAP: Si0.3 were 5.25 and 2.7% for reproducibility and repeatability studies, respectively. These values of RSD were <10%, so they were acceptable internationally. A good linear dose–response relationship was achieved over a dose range of up to 20 Gy with an excellent correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9969 and a calibration factor of F = 51.75 × 107 a.u./Gy. Almost no fading was registered from the studied CAP: Si0.3 sample after irradiation. Zeff values were found to be in the range 11.62 to 11.61, which are closely related to that of natural bone (11.3 to 11.8). Minimum detectable dose of CAP: Si0.3 had a value of 11 μGy. The outstanding features of this herein-prepared sample make it a good TLD nanophosphor, very suitable for personnel and environmental dosimetry of γ-radiation within the studied dose range.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Sueo M 1995 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 46 39910.1016/0969-806X(95)00183-X ↗
2. Andrzej G C and Mohammad H S 2004 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71 1710.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.05.040 ↗
3. Sueo M 1996 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 47 33310.1016/0969-806X(95)00125-H ↗
4. Jimmy C H, Puhl J M, Stephen M S, William L M, Marc F D, Debra L B et al 1998 NIST Special Publication 250–44 40
5. Hossam A O, Hany A, Abdel Azim H, Hussein E, Sufyan A A and Intesar A E 2021 Ceram. Int. 47 2778910.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.206 ↗
6. Intesar A E, Sufyan A A and Hossam A O 2020 J. Lumin. 227 11755510.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117555 ↗
7. Intesar A E and Sufyan A 2018 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 482 23610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.12.054 ↗
8. Intesar A E, Noha K E, Abdel Azim E H, Hussein M E and Sufyan A A 2016 J. Lumin. 31 1433
9. Intesar A E, Abdel Azim E H, Hussein M E and Sufyan A A 2014 Isot. Radiat. Res. 46 277
10. Abdullah M N, Yusoff M A, Rosli H M and David A B 2001 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 61 49710.1016/S0969-806X(01)00313-9 ↗
11. Unniyattil M, Jose M T, Akihiro T, Hoffmann W and Arunachalam R L 1999 J. Lumin. 82 22110.1016/S0022-2313(99)00044-7 ↗
12. Arunachalam R L, Jose M T, Vinoth K P and Pardeep V K 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 38610.1088/0022-3727/35/4/315 ↗
13. Sambhaji S S, Bhushan S D, Tumkur K G R and Buhwan C B 2001 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 268310.1088/0022-3727/34/17/317 ↗
14. Sahare P D and Sanjiv V M 1990 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 23 56710.1088/0022-3727/23/5/015 ↗
15. Sanjay J D, Sanjiv V M, Suresh M D, Pradeep L M and Vivek K K 1993 Phys. Status Solidi (a) 135 28910.1002/pssa.2211350126 ↗
16. Fariha H, Georgios K and Salome C 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 9 21810.1016/0168-583X(85)90685-8 ↗
17. Noman S, Sahare P D, Satya P L and Partik K 2006 Radiat. Meas. 41 4010.1016/j.radmeas.2005.07.026 ↗
18. Noman S, Sahare P D and Alexander A R 2007 J. Lumin. 124 35710.1016/j.jlumin.2006.04.004 ↗
19. Satya P L, Sahare P D, Ramswaroop S C, Noman S, Rajiv R and Akhilesh P 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 134310.1088/0022-3727/40/5/006 ↗
20. Nandkumar T M, Sahare P D, Makarand K, Bhuwan B, Vasanth N B and Sanjay D D 2014 J. Lumin. 146 12810.1016/j.jlumin.2013.09.061 ↗
21. Nandkumar T M, Sahare P D, Bhushankumar P, Bhoraskar Vasanth N and Sanjay D D 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 315 27310.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.073 ↗
22. Sahare P D, Rajiv R, Noman S and Satya P L 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 75910.1088/0022-3727/40/3/011 ↗
23. Juan M M, Raquel B, Carlos C V, Salcido Romero E G and Castaño V M 2010 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 139 58010.1093/rpd/ncp292 ↗
24. Vsevolod S K, Nikiforov S V, Moiseikin E V, Alexander S V and Simanov A G 2013 Solid State Phys. 55 208810.1134/S1063783413100168 ↗
25. Vsevolod S K, Anatoliy E E, Zatsepin A F and Nikiforov S V 2008 Radiat. Meas. 43 34110.1016/j.radmeas.2007.10.008 ↗
26. De Azevedo W M, Giovana B D O, Edelido F D S J, Khoury H J, de Ferreira E O and J, 2006 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 119 20110.1093/rpd/nci684 ↗
27. Matthew W B, Luiz G J, Stephanie C T, Özkan U, Brydon L B, Eduardo G Y et al 2010 J. Lumin. 130 82510.1016/j.jlumin.2009.12.008 ↗
28. Noman S, Zafar H K and Sameh S H 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 269 40110.1016/j.nimb.2010.12.054 ↗
29. Geeta R and Sahare P D 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 311 7110.1016/j.nimb.2013.06.018 ↗
30. Nandkumar T M, Vijaykumor B V, Makarand S K, Bhuwan C B, Sahare P D, Shital A R et al 2020 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 466 9010.1016/j.nimb.2020.01.008 ↗
31. Rohit K R, Amit K U, Rajiv S K and Sanjay J D 2012 J. Lumin. 132 21010.1016/j.jlumin.2011.08.003 ↗
32. Vladimir N M, Aleksandr L, Ch B L, Marco K, Evegni A V et al 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 266 294910.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.145 ↗
33. Adrie J J B 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 184 310.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0 ↗
34. He X, Zhu Z, Lijian H and Fachuang L 2016 Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 45 1659
35. Doory K, Han E K and Chang H K 2016 PLoS ONE 1 11
36. Preethi R, Sridhar K, Amar B, Rajkumar R and Eric L C 1988 J. Mater. Res. 3 81010.1557/JMR.1988.0810 ↗
37. Jeffery C B and George W S 1990 Sol-gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing (Academic press an Imprint of Elsevier. Depatment of Oxford, UK)
38. Mulder C A M, van Leeuwen-Stienstra G, Van Lierop J G and Woerdman J P 1986 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 82 14810.1016/0022-3093(86)90123-7 ↗
39. Johan H H and Stephen M S 1995 Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest (National Inst. of Standards and Technology-PL, Gaithersburg (United States: NIST)
40. Ahmed E, Abdul Azim H, Hussein E, Noha K, Amin E and Hossam D 2011 J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 288 6510.1007/s10967-010-0924-7 ↗
41. Daphne F J and Hawkes D J 1981 Phys. Rep. 70 16910.1016/0370-1573(81)90014-4 ↗
42. Parthasaradhi K 1968 Studies on the effective atomic numbers in alloys for gamma-ray interactions in the energy region 100 to 662 keV (Andhra University, Waltair, India)
43. Leif G, Guilbert N, Bjørn Jensen K and Levring H 2004 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71 65310.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040 ↗
44. Chen R, McKeever S W S 1997 Theory of Thermoluminescence and related phenomena (Singapore: World Scientific)
45. Nil K, Aziz H G, Mehmet Y, Tamer D and Mustafa T 2015 Appl. Radiat. Isot. 104 18610.1016/j.apradiso.2015.07.007 ↗
46. Ilich B M 1979 Sov. Phys. Solid State 21 1880
47. Mahmoud S R, Mahmoud A E and Mohamed A H 2006 Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 161 57910.1080/10420150600879732 ↗
48. May C E and Partridge J A 1964 J. Chem. Phys. 40 140110.1063/1.1725324 ↗
49. Carlo M, Ricci A and Sergi A 1968 Ric. Sci. 9 762
50. Barbara O, Paweł B, Krzysztof H and Peter M 2014 High-level TL Dosimetry for high-temperature environment, RAD Conference, Nis, Serbia
51. Leticia L C and Mateus F L 1986 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 14 33310.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079666 ↗