Topography and electrostatic interactions of electret fibres in N95 facemasks
Source abstract
Abstract
Facemasks have been a critical line of defense in the Covid-19 pandemic and have been used for decades to reduce the inhalation of sub-micron aerosols, including bacteria, viruses and nano-materials. These facemasks leverage electrostatic charge properties of non-woven electret fibre mats to remove sub-micron aerosols. However, the topographical and electrostatic properties of these mats have not been well characterized at the nano-scale. In this study, we use atomic force microscopy (AFM) to examine the surface topography of the electret fibres within a commercial respirator fibre mat, use electrostatic force microscopy to map the electrostatic interactions emanating from these fibres, and use synchrotron X-ray scattering to probe polymer morphology. We find that within these mats the fibres exhibit significant heterogeneity in surface topography, electrostatic interactions and polypropylene phase composition. The surface topographies ranged from nano-smooth surfaces to ordered spherulitic structures. The electrostatic interactions varied across fibre length and circumference, and are only weakly correlated with surface topographical features. Finally, we use AFM to characterize fibres after filtering a NaCl aerosol and find that the deposited particles are heterogeneous in size and distributed over the fibre surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Infection Control and Ventilation · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee H R, Liao L, Xiao W, Vailionis A, Ricco A J, White R et al 2021 Nano Lett. 21 65110.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04230 ↗
2. Yim W, Cheng D, Patel S H, Kou R, Meng Y S and Jokerst J V 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 5447310.1021/acsami.0c17333 ↗
3. Bałazy A, Toivola M, Adhikari A, Sivasubramani S K, Reponen T and Grinshpun S A 2006 Am. J. Infect. Control 34 5110.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018 ↗
4. Hossain E, Bhadra S, Jain H, Das S, Bhattacharya A, Ghosh S et al 2020 Phys. Fluids 32 09330410.1063/5.0023940 ↗
5. Liao L, Xiao W, Zhao M, Yu X, Wang H, Wang Q et al 2020 ACS Nano 14 634810.1021/acsnano.0c03597 ↗
6. Lin T-H, Chen C-C, Huang S-H, Kuo C-W, Lai C-Y and Lin W-Y 2017 PLOS ONE 12 e018621710.1371/journal.pone.0186217 ↗
7. Drabek J and Zatloukal M 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 09130110.1063/1.5116336 ↗
8. Larsen G S, Cheng Y, Daemen L L, Lamichhane T N, Hensley D K, Hong K et al 2021 ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 3 102210.1021/acsapm.0c01294 ↗
9. Lee K, Jung S, Lee J, Seo D and Kim J 2021 ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4 216710.1021/acsanm.0c03477 ↗
10. Meng Y, Zeng R, Rubin K and Barry K 2020 MRS Adv. 5 286310.1557/adv.2020.347 ↗
11. Kim J, Jasper W and Hinestroza J 2007 J. Microsc. 225 7210.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01716.x ↗
12. Kim J, Hinestroza J P, Jasper W and Barker R 2009 Text. Res. J. 79 34310.1177/0040517508090887 ↗
13. Kim J, Jasper W, Barker R L and Hinestroza J P 2010 Fibers Polym. 11 77510.1007/s12221-010-0775-4 ↗
14. Kim J, Hinestroza J P, Jasper W and Barker R L 2011 Fibers Polym. 12 8910.1007/s12221-011-0089-1 ↗
15. Bonilla R, Ávila A, Montenegro C and Hinestroza J 2012 J. Microsc. 248 26610.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03671.x ↗
16. Nath R, Patidar M M, Kausik V, Behera P, Saravanan P, Ganesan V et al 2020 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 27 146910.1109/TDEI.2020.008917 ↗
17. Gao H, He W, Zhao Y-B, Opris D M, Xu G and Wang J 2020 J. Membr. Sci. 600 11787910.1016/j.memsci.2020.117879 ↗
18. Thakur R, Das D and Das A 2013 Purif. Rev. 42 8710.1080/15422119.2012.681094 ↗
19. Hao J, de Oliveira Passos, Santos R and Rutledge G C 2021 ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4 3675
20. Kerner M, Schmidt K, Hellmann A, Schumacher S, Pitz M, Asbach C et al 2018 J. Aerosol. Sci. 122 3210.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.05.004 ↗
21. Yagishita A, Yamanouchi H and Ikezaki K 1999 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38 205310.1143/JJAP.38.2053 ↗
22. Decontamination of 3M Filtering Facepiece Respirators: Global Considerations. Available: https://multimedia.3m.com/ (accessed on Nov, 2021)
23. Said R A 2001 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 34 L710.1088/0022-3727/34/3/101 ↗
24. Ashiotis G, Deschildre A, Nawaz Z, Wright J P, Karkoulis D, Picca F E et al 2015 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48 51010.1107/S1600576715004306 ↗
25. Gahleitner M, Mileva D, Gloger D, Androsch R and Tranchida D 2017 AIP Conf. Proc. 1914 13000110.1063/1.5016762 ↗
26. De Rovère A, Shambaugh R L and O’Rear E A 2000 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 77 192110.1002/1097-4628(20000829)77:9<1921::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
27. Basset, 1981 D C Principles of polymer morphology (England: Cambridge University Press)
28. Bénard A and Advani S G 1996 Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 52010.1002/pen.10438 ↗
29. Lee Y and Wadsworth L C 1992 Polymer 33 120010.1016/0032-3861(92)90764-N ↗
30. Nishida K, Okada K, Asakawa H, Matsuba G, Ito K, Kanaya T et al 2012 Polym. J. 44 9510.1038/pj.2011.118 ↗
31. Søndergaard K, Minà P and Piccarolo S 1997 J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. B 36 73310.1080/00222349708212399 ↗
32. Konishi T, Nishida K and Kanaya T 2006 Macromolecules 39 803510.1021/ma060191b ↗