journal article·2020-12

Characteristics of ionic adsorption on silica nanoparticles and its impact on the long term stability of dye-sensitized solar cells

SHYAMA PRASAD MOHANTY, PARAG BHARGAVA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Quasi-solid electrolytes based on silica nanopowder are well known in literature and these electrolytes are able to match in performance with that of liquid electrolytes. However, contrasting results are observed in literature regarding stability of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with most of the reported articles projecting silica-loaded quasi-solid electrolyte-based cells as a stable alternative to liquid electrolyte-based cells, while a few others contradicting the same. The present study demonstrates the effect of ageing under heat (60°C) and illumination on the performance of liquid electrolyte and silica-loaded electrolyte-based DSSCs. It has been observed that DSSC based on silica-loaded electrolyte are less stable than DSSC based on liquid electrolyte even though independent study on both electrolytes by thermal analysis shows silica-loaded electrolyte to be more stable than liquid electrolyte. Segregation of silica in electrolyte has been confirmed through cryo-field emission gun-scanning electron microscopy. Zeta potential measurements show that ions are desorbed from the surface of silica on ageing under heat and illumination.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Mathew S, Yella A, Gao P, Humphry-Baker R, Curchod Basile F E, Ashari-Astani N et al 2014 Nat. Chem. 6 24210.1038/nchem.1861 ↗
2. Chiba Y, Islam A, Watanabe Y, Komiya R, Koide N and Han L 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 L63810.1143/JJAP.45.L638 ↗
3. Han L, Islam A, Chen H, Malapaka C, Chiranjeevi B, Zhang S et al 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 605710.1039/c2ee03418b ↗
4. Yella A, Lee H W, Tsao H N, Yi C, Chandiran A K, Nazeeruddin M K et al 2011 Science 334 62910.1126/science.1209688 ↗
5. Wang P, Zakeeruddin S M, Moser J E, Nazeeruddin M K, Sekiguchi T and Grätzel M 2003 Nat. Mater. 2 40210.1038/nmat904 ↗
6. Wang P, Zakeeruddin S M, Comte P, Exnar I and Grätzel M 2003 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 116610.1021/ja029294+ ↗
7. Berginc M, Hocevar M, Krasovec U O, Hinsch A, Sastrawan R and Topic M 2008 Thin Solid Films 516 464510.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.079 ↗
8. Usui H, Matsui H, Tanabe N and Yanagida S 2004 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 164 9710.1016/j.jphotochem.2003.12.020 ↗
9. Wang P, Zakeeruddin S M and Grätzel M 2004 J. Fluorine Chem. 125 124110.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.05.010 ↗
10. Lee H F, Wu J L, Hsu P Y, Tung Y L, Ouyang F Y and Kai J J 2013 Thin Solid Films 529 210.1016/j.tsf.2012.06.025 ↗
11. Han D M, Ko K W, Han C H and Kim Y S 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 852910.1039/c3ta11919j ↗
12. Olsen E, Hagen G and Eric Lindquist S 2000 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 63 26710.1016/S0927-0248(00)00033-7 ↗
13. Syrrokostas G, Siokou A, Leftheriotis G and Yianoulis P 2012 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 103 11910.1016/j.solmat.2012.04.021 ↗
14. Ueno K, Inaba A, Kondoh M and Watanabe M 2008 Langmuir 24 525310.1021/la704066v ↗
15. Xue G, Guo Y, Yu T, Guan J, Yu X, Zhang J et al 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 149610.1016/S1452-3981(23)13430-4 ↗