Assessment of hybrid density functional in revealing electronic response and half-metallic character of TM2O3 (TM = Ti, V and Cr) and their Compton spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Compton profiles (CPs) of TM2O3 (TM = Ti, V and Cr) have been measured using 100 mCi 241Am Compton spectrometer. The experimental momentum densities have been used to check the applicability of exchange-correlation energies using pure and hybrid density functional theory (DFT). Present ab-initio computations have been accomplished using the texture of Gaussian orbitals within linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) scheme. Based on experimental and theoretical CPs, hybrid DFT schemes namely B3LYP and PBESOL0 have shown better performance than pure DFT (within local density and generalized gradient approximation), whereas the best agreement (through χ2 fitting of goodness) is obtained for B3LYP prescriptions. Besides Compton spectroscopy, the spin-up (↑) energy bands and density of states (DOS) have confirmed the metallic nature of all three compounds, whereas the spin-down (↓) energy bands and DOS for Ti2O3 and V2O3 have shown a peculiar semiconducting behaviour leading to their very peculiar half-metallic character. Further, higher values of charge transfer from all the 3d transition elements to O atoms, as witnessed using Mulliken’s population analysis, show a dominancy of ionic nature in these oxides. Equally normalized CPs of these oxides show that the 3d electrons in oxide environment are delocalized (in real space) in the ascending sequence Cr→V→Ti, which is in contrast to their elemental-free atom environment.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Veryazov V A, Leko A V and Évarestov R A 1999 Phys. Solid State 41 128610.1134/1.1130983 ↗
2. Évarestov R A and Panin A I 2000 Phys. Solid State 42 5910.1134/1.1131168 ↗
3. Paxton A T and Thien-Nga L 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 157910.1103/PhysRevB.57.1579 ↗
4. Mattheiss L F 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 5987
5. Keller G, Held K, Eyert V, Vollhardt D and Anisimov V I 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 20511610.1103/PhysRevB.70.205116 ↗
6. Mattheiss L F 1994 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 6477
7. Panaccione G, Sacchi M, Torelli P, Offi F, Cautero G, Sergo R et al 2007 J. Elect. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 156–158 6410.1016/j.elspec.2006.11.050 ↗
8. Shin S, Tezuka Y, Kinoshita T, Ishii T, Kashiwakura T, Takahashi M et al 1995 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64 123010.1143/JPSJ.64.1230 ↗
9. Cline J A, Rigos A A and Arias T A 2000 J. Phys. Chem. B 104 619510.1021/jp9943474 ↗
10. Catti M, Sandrone G, Valerio G and Dovesi R 1996 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 57 173510.1016/0022-3697(96)00034-0 ↗
11. Larbi T, Ouni B, Gantassi A, Doll K, Amlouk M and Manoubi T 2017 J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 444 1610.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.103 ↗
12. Aly A E and Rai D P 2018 Inter. J. Comput. Phys. Ser. 1 9110.29167/A1I1P91-96 ↗
13. Uozumi T, Okada K and Kotani A 1996 J. Elect. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenol. 78 10310.1016/S0368-2048(96)80037-5 ↗
14. Bocquet A E, Mizokawa T, Morikawa K, Fujimori A, Barman S R, Maiti K et al 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 116110.1103/PhysRevB.53.1161 ↗
15. Catti M and Sandrone G 1997 Faraday Discuss. 106 18910.1039/a701580a ↗
16. Catti M, Sandrone G and Dovesi R 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 1612210.1103/PhysRevB.55.16122 ↗
17. Eyert V, Schwingenschlögl U and Eckern U 2005 Europhys. Lett. 70 78210.1209/epl/i2005-10050-2 ↗
18. Guo Y, Clark S J and Robertson J 2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 325504
19. Long O Y, Gautam G S and Carter E A 2020 Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 04540110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.045401 ↗
20. Cooper M J, Mijnarends P E, Shiotani N, Sakai N and Bansil A 2004 X-ray compton scattering (New York: Oxford Science Publications)10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198501688.001.0001 ↗
21. Heda N L and Ahuja B L 2010 In: B L Ahuja (ed) Recent trends in radiation physics research (New Delhi: Himanshu Publications) p 25
22. Dovesi R, Saunders V R, Roetti C, Orlando R, Zicovich-Wilson C M, Pascale F et al 2014 CRYSTAL14 user’s manual. University of Torino, Torino
23. Ahuja B L, Sharma V, Rathor A, Jani A R and Sharma B K 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 262 39110.1016/j.nimb.2007.05.029 ↗
24. Timms D N 1989 Ph.D. Thesis (University of Warwick, UK)
25. Felsteiner J, Pattison P and Cooper M J 1974 Philos. Mag. 30 53710.1080/14786439808206579 ↗
26. Biggs F, Mendelsohn L B and Mann J B 1975 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 16 20110.1016/0092-640X(75)90030-3 ↗
27. Perdew J P and Zunger A 1981 Phys. Rev. B 23 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
28. Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
29. Becke A D 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
30. Vosko S H, Wilk L and Nusair M 1980 Can. J. Phys. 58 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
31. Lee C, Yang W and Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
32. Momma K and Izumi F 2011 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44 127210.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
33. Ahuja B L, Sharma S, Heda N L, Tiwari S, Kumar K, Meena B S et al 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 92 5310.1016/j.jpcs.2016.01.016 ↗
34. Sharma S, Heda N L, Suthar K K, Bhatt S, Sharma K and Ahuja B L 2015 Comput. Mater. Sci. 104 20510.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.001 ↗
35. Meena S K, Meena L, Heda N L and Ahuja B L 2020 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 176 10899010.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108990 ↗
36. Heda N L, Panwar K, Kumar K and Ahuja B L 2020 J. Mater. Sci. 55 391210.1007/s10853-019-04289-8 ↗
37. Meena B S, Heda N L, Kumar K, Bhatt S, Mund H S and Ahuja B L 2016 Phys. B: Condens. Matter 484 110.1016/j.physb.2015.12.035 ↗
38. Bhatt S, Ahuja U, Kumar K and Heda N L 2018 Phys. B: Condens. Matter 537 23610.1016/j.physb.2018.02.019 ↗