journal article·2018-10

Influence of zinc oxide nanorods on an orientationally ordered fluid comprising soft-bent dimers

Pragnya Satapathy, Srividhya Parthasarathi, D S Shankar Rao, Madhubabu Kanakala, C V Yelamaggad, S Krishna Prasad

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Bent-core liquid crystals (LCs) introduced a whole new dimension to the science of LCs. Besides re-emphasizing the importance of the shape of the molecule, they brought in phases with symmetry, not known earlier. Another sub-class of systems that is emerging is that of soft-bent molecules. In contrast with the bent-core molecules, here the bend is achieved through the parity of the aliphatic linker that connects two monomers. They hold the unique advantage that a simple variation of temperature can favour different conformer states and thus govern the self-assembled structure. A highlight of the power of this route is seen in terms of the discovery of a new type of nematic, viz., twist–bend nematic. Investigations on not only this phase but also the regular nematic that often precedes it have received significant attention in the last few years. Here we present results on the regular nematic phase of a binary mixture comprising such a soft-bent dimer, known in the literature as CB7CB, by incorporating zinc oxide nanorods (NRs) into the system. The NRs with an aspect ratio of $${\sim }$$ 7.2, not very different from that of LCs, further accentuate the importance of shape and shape anisotropy of the entities. Specifically, we observe that the nematic–isotropic transition temperature increases by $${\sim }$$ 1.9 K even for a low concentration of 4% NRs. While the dielectric anisotropy decreases, birefringence shows a substantial increase, adding to the complexity of the influence. Upon addition of minute amount of NRs (1%), while the splay elastic constant gets enhanced, its bend counterpart not only gets reduced but retains the convex-shaped thermal profile seen for the parent mixture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Plant Reproductive Biology · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Dozov I 2001 Europhys. Lett. 56 24710.1209/epl/i2001-00513-x ↗
2. Panov V P, Nagaraj M, Vij J K, Panarin Y P, Kohlmeier A, Tamba M G et al 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 16780110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.167801 ↗
3. Cestari M, Frezza E, Ferrarini A and Luckhurst G R 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 1230310.1039/c1jm12233a ↗
4. Chen D, Porada J H, Hooper J B, Klittnick A, Shen Y M, Tuchband M et al 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 1593110.1073/pnas.1314654110 ↗
5. Henderson P A and Imrie C T 2011 Liq. Cryst. 38 140710.1080/02678292.2011.624368 ↗
6. Martínez-Mirandaa L J, Traister K M, Meléndez-Rodríguez I and Salamanca-Riba L 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 22330110.1063/1.3511736 ↗
7. Joshi T, Kumar A, Prakash J and Biradar A M 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 25310910.1063/1.3455325 ↗
8. Yuan K, Li F, Chen L, Li Y and Chen Y 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 633210.1021/jp3004079 ↗
9. Pandey K K, Misra A K and Manohar R 2016 Appl. Nanosci. 6 14110.1007/s13204-015-0423-9 ↗
10. Zheng Z, Butynska R, Serrano C V, Marty J, Mingotaud C and Kahn M L 2016 Chem. Eur. J. 22 1561410.1002/chem.201602742 ↗
11. Ma Q, Ma S and HuangY M 2018 Mater. Lett. 218 23710.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.028 ↗
12. Chandrasekhar S 1994 Liquid crystals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
13. Cestari M, Berart S D, Dunmur D A, Ferrarini A, de la Fuente M R, Jackson D J B et al 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 03170410.1103/PhysRevE.84.031704 ↗
14. Parthasarathi S, Rao D S S, Palakurthy N B, Yelamaggad C V and Krishna Prasad S 2017 J. Phys. Chem. B 121 89610.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10563 ↗
15. Parthasarathi S, Rao D S S, Palakurthy N B, Yelamaggad C V and Krishna Prasad S 2016 J. Phys. Chem. B 120 505610.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03048 ↗
16. Krishnamurthy K S, Palakurthy N B and Yelamaggad C V 2017 J. Phys. Chem. B 121 544710.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03072 ↗
17. Yun C J, Vengatesan M R, Vij J K and Song J K 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 17310210.1063/1.4919065 ↗
18. Pal A K and Mohan D B 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 333 24410.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.015 ↗
19. Sun H, Luo M, Weng W, Cheng K, Du P, Shen G et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 39560
20. Deuling H J 1972 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 19 12310.1080/15421407208083858 ↗
21. Uchida T and Takahashi Y 1981 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 72 13310.1080/01406568108084049 ↗
22. Madhuri P L, Krishna Prasad S, Hiremath U S and Yelamaggad C V 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 24111110.1063/1.4885041 ↗
23. Parthasarathi S, Rao D S S, Fodor C K and Krishna Prasad S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. B 118 1452610.1021/jp509827r ↗
24. Yadav S P and Singh S 2016 Prog. Mater. Sci. 80 3810.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.12.002 ↗
25. Basu R, Sigdel K P and Iannacchione G S 2011 Eur. Phys. J. E 34 3410.1140/epje/i2011-11034-7 ↗
26. Sathyanarayana P, Mathew M, Li Q, Sastry V S S, Kundu B, Le K V et al 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 01070210.1103/PhysRevE.81.010702 ↗
27. Wiant D, Gleeson J T, Eber N, Fodor-Csorba K, Jakli A and Toth-Katona T 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 04171210.1103/PhysRevE.72.041712 ↗