Influence of mineral phase in mineralization of a biocomposite containing chitosan, demineralized bone matrix and bone ash—in vitro study
Source abstract
Abstract
A resorbable composite which acts as a active barrier in guided bone regeneration was fabricated using chitosan, demineralized bone matrix and bone ash. Its potential to form bone like apatite in simulated body fluid was assessed in this study. The mechanical strength of these composites was correlated with bone ash ratios and composites with better tensile strength were studied for their acellular bioactivity by incubating in simulated body fluid for 21 days. Composites without bone ash did not show acellular bioactivity which was confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis. In case of biocomposites with bone ash, there was an increase in residual weight indicating the mineralization of the composite. The composite containing bone ash has shown the peaks related to phosphate vibrations in its Fourier-transform infrared spectrum. Scanning micrographs revealed formation of apatite like crystals on its surface. Ca/P ratio was found to be 1·7 which is nearer to that of natural bone. Thus, prepared composites can be used as resorbable biocomposite in maxillofacial and oral defects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmet P, Mithat Y, Erdal C, Sevil S and Cuneyt Tas A 2010 Acta Biomaterialia 6 228210.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.013 ↗
2. Caplanis N, Sigurdsson T J, Rohrer M D and Wikesjo U M 1997 Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant 12 634
3. Deepak K, Patnayak P, Divya S, Upadhyay R C, Prasad B T R and Rama Mohan T R 2005 Trends. Biomater. Artif. Organs 18 87
4. Di Martino A, Sittinger M and Risbud M V 2005 Biomaterials 26 598310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.016 ↗
5. Toque J A, Herliansyah M K, Hamdi M, Ide-Ektessabi A and Wildan M W 2007 IFMBE Proceedings 15 15210.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_39 ↗
6. Jansen J A, De Ruijter J E, Jansen P T M and Paquay Y G C J 1995 Biomaterials 16 81910.1016/0142-9612(95)94142-8 ↗
7. Jeon O, Song S J, Kang S W, Putnam A J and Kim B S 2007 Biomaterials 28 276310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.023 ↗
8. Kikuchi M et al 2004 Biomaterials 25 597910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.001 ↗
9. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T and Yamamuro T 1990 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24 72110.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
10. Lee E J, Shin D S, Kim H E, Kim H W, Koh Y H and Jang J H 2009 Biomaterials 30 74310.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.025 ↗
11. Lee E J, Teng S H, Jang T S, Wang P, Yook S W, Kim H E and Koh Y H 2010 Acta Biomaterialia 6 355710.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.022 ↗
12. Ma L, Gao C, Mao Z, Zhou J, Shen J, Hu X and Han C 2003 Biomaterials 24 483310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00374-0 ↗
13. Mostafa N Y 2005 Mater. Chem. Phys. 94 33310.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.05.011 ↗
14. Neo M, Nakamura T, Ohtsuki C, Kokubo T and Yamamuro T 1993 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 99910.1002/jbm.820270805 ↗
15. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Russo P and Matarasso S 1996 Biomaterials 17 79110.1016/0142-9612(96)81416-5 ↗
16. Qi L X Z, Jiang X, Hu C and Zou X 2004 Carbohydr. Res. 339 269310.1016/j.carres.2004.09.007 ↗
17. Schenk R K, Buser D, Hardwick W R and Dahlin C 1994 Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 9 13
18. Simon M, Baldoni M, Rossi P and Zaffe D 1994 Int. J. Periodont. Restorative. Dent. 14 166
19. Van Leeuwen A C, Huddleston Slater J J R, Gielkens P F M, De Jong J R, Grijpma D W and Bos R R M 2012 Acta Biomaterialia 8 142210.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.004 ↗