journal article·2012-02Open access

Influence of heat treatment on microstructure and passivity of Cu–30Zn–1Sn alloy in buffer solution containing chloride ions

U TABRIZI, R PARVIZI, A DAVOODI, M H MOAYED

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 1

Abstract

Tin as an alloying element is of great interest in brasses for dezincification impediment. In this paper, Cu–30Zn–1Sn alloy was submitted to three different heat treatments, viz. A (heating up to 800 °C for 20 h, held at 200 °C for 20 h in salt bath and air cooled), B (heating up to 800 °C for 20 h and water quenched) and C (heating up to 600 °C for 20 h and water quenched). The influence of heat treatment on microstructure was evaluated by OM and SEM–EDS analysis. The corrosion resistance in buffer solution (pH 9), H3BO3/Na2B4O7 ·10H2O, with various concentrations of chloride ions was evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization curves and compared with multi-component Pourbaix diagrams. A correlation between the heat treatment, microstructure and passivity of the heat treated samples was observed. The results indicated that all heat treatment procedures led to formation of α, and γ-Sn-rich phases as microstructure constituents with a small fraction of β′ phase in A. Sn-rich phase appears in grain boundaries and its morphology was slightly changed due to heat treatment. Beneficial influence of low concentration chloride ions on passivity was associated with the formation of copper oxides/hydroxide and chloride complexes. Deterioration was observed at concentrations higher than 0·05 M NaCl due to accelerated dissolution of copper by formation of CuCl\(2-\). As a result of dezincification process, preferential corrosion attack and copper redeposition on α phase (matrix) were observed. However, Sn-rich (γ1) phase in grain boundaries was not attacked due to SnO2 formation. In buffer solution, the higher passivity current density in A was related to the presence of small amount of β′ phase. On the other hand, in 1 M NaCl, lower critical current density for passivation in B and A (about two times lower than C) was attributed to the grain size effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Science · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Bauxite Residue and Utilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Alfantazi A M, Ahmed T M and Tromans D 2009 Mater. Des. 30 242510.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.015 ↗
2. Asan A, Kabasakaloglu M, Isiklan M and Kılıc Z 2005 Corros. Sci. 47 153410.1016/j.corsci.2004.07.031 ↗
3. ASM handbook 2004a Metallography and microstructure (Ohio: ASM International) 9th ed., Vol. 9, pp 758, 759 and 1818
4. ASM handbook 2004b Heat treatment (Ohio: ASM International) 9th ed., Vol. 4, pp 451, 1860 and 1960
5. ASM handbook 2004c Corrosion (Ohio: ASM international) 9th ed., Vol. 13, p. 1508
6. Crousier J and Bimaghra I 1989 Electrochim. Acta 34 120510.1016/0013-4686(89)87159-2 ↗
7. Effenberg H and Ilyenko S 2006 Ternary alloy systems phase diagrams, crystallographic and thermodynamic data, materials science and international team evaluated by MSIT, pp. 422–435
8. Hansen M and Anderko K 1958 Constitution of binary alloys (New York: McGraw-Hill) 2nd ed., p. 65010.1149/1.2428700 ↗
9. Heidersbach R H and Verink E D 1972 Corrosion 28 39710.5006/0010-9312-28.11.397 ↗
10. Jones D A 1992 Principles and prevention of corrosion (New York: Macmillan Publishing) p. 325
11. Kabasakaloglu M, Kiyak T, Sendil O and Asan A 2002 Appl. Surf. Sci. 193 16710.1016/S0169-4332(02)00258-1 ↗
12. Mamas S, Kiyak T, Kabasakaloglu M and Koc A 2005 Mater. Chem. Phys. 93 4110.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.02.012 ↗
13. Medusa thermodynamic software 2009 Puigdomenech I (http://www.kemi.kth.se/medusa/)
14. Milosev I, Mikic T K and Gaberscek M 2006 Electrochim. Acta 52 41510.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.024 ↗
15. Morales J, Fernandez G T, Esparza P, Gonzalez S, Salvarezza R C and Arvia A J 1995a Corros. Sci. 37 211, 23110.1016/0010-938X(94)00108-I ↗
16. Morales J, Fernandez G T, Esparza P, Gonzalez S, Salvarezza R C and Arvia A J 1995b Corros. Sci. 40 17710.1016/S0010-938X(97)00111-X ↗
17. Newman R C, Shahrabi T and Sieradzki K 1988 Corros. Sci. 28 87310.1016/0010-938X(88)90036-4 ↗
18. Polunin A V, Pchelnikov A P, Losev V V and Marshakov I K 1982 Electrochim. Acta 27 46710.1016/0013-4686(82)85025-1 ↗
19. Scendo M 2007 Corros. Sci. 49 37310.1016/j.corsci.2006.06.022 ↗
20. Sherif E M and Park S M 2006 Electrochim. Acta 51 466510.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.007 ↗
21. Sherif E M, El-Shamy A M, Ramla M M and El-Nazhawy A O H 2007a Mater. Chem. Phys. 102 23110.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.12.009 ↗
22. Sherif E M, Erasmus R M and Comins J D 2007b J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 309 47010.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.003 ↗
23. Sherif E M, Erasmus R M and Comins J D 2008 Corros. Sci. 50 343910.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.002 ↗
24. Sohn S and Kang T 2002 J. Alloys Compd 335 28110.1016/S0925-8388(01)01839-4 ↗
25. Toivanen R O, Hirvonen J and Lindroos V K 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 7–8 20010.1016/0168-583X(85)90555-5 ↗
26. Zou J Y, Wang D H and Qiu W C 1997 Electrochim. Acta 42 173310.1016/S0013-4686(96)00373-8 ↗