journal article·2021-06

Enhanced magnetic permeability in Ni1−x(Zn0.6Mg0.2Cu0.2)xFe2O4 synthesized by auto combustion method

S Shafiee, A Arab, N Riahi-Nouri

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Ni1−x(Zn0.6Mg0.2Cu0.2)xFe2O4 (where x = 0.0, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7) was prepared by the auto combustion method and was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). From XRD analysis, the average crystallite size and lattice constant were determined in the range of 6–11 nm and 8.331–8.372 A, respectively. The structure of single-phase cubic in samples was also confirmed because the main peaks of the patterns were related to the position of the peaks in the mentioned standard (JCPDS card no. 00-008-0234). The average size of the particle was calculated in the range of 21–26 nm from the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The atomic percentage of elements was obtained from the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). From room-temperature hysteresis loops, the magnetization was evaluated in a magnetic field of 9 kOe. It was observed that the magnetization was not saturated and was increased with the increment in x values. According to the core–shell model, the magnetic behaviour of samples were discussed. The results illustrated that the magnetization of the sample with x = 0.7, due to the larger particle size than that of other samples, was the highest. In addition, the increase in magnetization was also discussed based on Neel's theory and the site's occupation of the substituted cations on the sub-lattices. Also, the variation of coercivity was investigated. The coercivity, due to the multi-domain structure of samples, was decreased with doping Zn, Mg and Cu. Among all the samples, the sample with x = 0.7 indicated the lowest coercivity and the sample with x = 0 showed the highest coercivity. Based on the domain wall movement, the variations of initial permeability as a function of frequency in the frequency range of 10 kHz–10 MHz were discussed. The results indicated that the initial permeability of the sample with x = 0.7, similar to its magnetization, was the highest. The constancy of µ′ in the frequency range of 10 kHz–1 MHz was due to the motion of the domain wall, which was indicated by the compositional stability and quality of the samples. Finally, the results obtained from the initial permeability in the present work were compared to the values obtained from the previous researchers. Generally, it was observed that the sample with x = 0.7, due to the maximum magnetization, highest initial permeability and lowest coercivity could be suitable for high-frequency applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghodake J S, Kambale R C, Shinde T J, Maskar P K and Suryavanshi S S 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 401 93810.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.009 ↗
2. Rahman M T, Vargas M and Ramana C V 2014 J. Alloys Compd. 617 54710.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.182 ↗
3. Meng Y Y, Liu Z W, Dai H C, Yu H Y, Zeng D C, Shukla S et al 2010 Powder Technol. 229 27010.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.050 ↗
4. Gholizadeh A and Jafari E 2017 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 422 32810.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.029 ↗
5. Saafan S A, Meaz T M, Ghazzawy E H, Nimr M K, Ayad M M and Bakr M 2010 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322 236910.1016/j.jmmm.2010.02.039 ↗
6. Gangaswamy D R S, Chaitanya Varma M, Bharadwaj S, Sambasiva Rao K and Rao K H 2015 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28 359910.1007/s10948-015-3188-1 ↗
7. Ramesh S, Dhanalakshmi B, Sekhar B C, Rao P S V S and Rao B P 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 959110.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.043 ↗
8. Li X and Wang G 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 127610.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.006 ↗
9. Parvatheeswara Rao B, Dhanalakshmi B, Ramesh S and Subba Rao P S V 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 456 44410.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.086 ↗
10. Anwar H and Maqsood A 2014 Mater. Res. Bull. 49 42610.1016/j.materresbull.2013.09.009 ↗
11. Thorat L M, Patil J Y, Nadargi D Y, Ghodake U R, Kambale R C and Suryavanshi J S S 2018 J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 76 73110.1007/s10971-018-4665-3 ↗
12. Roy P K and Bera J 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 298 3810.1016/j.jmmm.2005.03.007 ↗
13. Dar M A, Varma V, Gairola S P, Siddique W A, Singh R K and Kotnala R K 2012 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 534210.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.158 ↗
14. Singh N, Agarwal A, Sanghi S and Khasa S 2012 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 250610.1016/j.jmmm.2012.03.023 ↗
15. Sujatha C H, Venugopal Reddy K, Sowri Babu K, Rama Chandra Reddy A and Rao K H 2012 Physica B 407 123210.1016/j.physb.2012.01.108 ↗
16. Ati A A, Othaman Z and Samavati A 2013 J. Mol. Struct. 1052 17710.1016/j.molstruc.2013.08.040 ↗
17. Kumar G R, Kumar K V and Venudhar Y C 2012 Mater. Sci. Appl. 3 87
18. Tancharoen T, Ruangphanit A and Pecharapa W 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 S23910.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.069 ↗
19. Cullity B D and Grahm C D 2009 Introduction to magnetic materials 2nd edn (IEEE: Wiley)10.1002/9780470386323 ↗
20. Bahiraei H and Ong C K 2016 Ceram. Int. 43 478010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.202 ↗
21. Jacobo S E P and Bercoff G 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 766410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.180 ↗
22. Yoon D H and Raju K 2016 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 29 43910.1007/s10948-015-3276-2 ↗
23. Shams Alam R, Moradi M, Rostami M, Nikmanesh H, Moayedi R and Bai Y 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 381 110.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.059 ↗
24. Amighian J, Mozaffari M, Arab A and Yousefi M H 2010 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322 74810.1016/j.jmmm.2009.10.053 ↗
25. Ghanbari F, Arab A, Shishe Bor M and Mardaneh M R 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 211210.1007/s11664-016-5140-y ↗
26. Pei J and Wang Z 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 465 59810.1016/j.jmmm.2018.06.045 ↗
27. Arabi H and Ganjali F 2013 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 26 103110.1007/s10948-013-2102-y ↗
28. Sertkol M, Köseoğlu Y, Bayka A, Kavas H and Başaran A C 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 15710.1016/j.jmmm.2008.08.083 ↗
29. Maghsoudi I, Shokrollahi H, Hadianfard M J and Amighian J 2013 Powder Technol. 235 11010.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.002 ↗
30. Gangaswamy D R S, Choudary G S V R K, Chaitanya Varma M, Bharadwaj S and Rao K H 2018 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 31 375310.1007/s10948-018-4638-3 ↗
31. Neel L 1948 Ann. Phys. 3 13710.1051/anphys/194812030137 ↗
32. Gabal M A, El-Shishtawy R M and Angari Y M A 2012 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 225810.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.112 ↗
33. Balavijayalakshmi J, Suriyanarayanan N and Jayaprakash R 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 385 30210.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.036 ↗
34. Shams Alam R, Moradi M, Rostami M, Nikmanesh H, Moayedi R and Bai Y 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1 381
35. Verma A and Chatterjee R 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 306 31310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.03.033 ↗
36. Kargar Z, Asgarian S M and Mozaffari M 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 375 7110.1016/j.nimb.2016.03.041 ↗
37. Hasani S, Shamanian M, Shafyei A, Behjati P, Nezakat M, Fathi-Moghaddam M et al 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 25310.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.050 ↗
38. Rezlescu N, Doroftei C, Rezlescu E and Popa P D 2008 J. Alloys Compd. 451 49210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.102 ↗
39. Hajalilou A, Hashim M, Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi R and Mohamed Kamari H 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 633 30610.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.061 ↗
40. Kadam A A, Shinde S S, Yadav S P, Patil P S and Rajpure K Y 2013 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 329 5910.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.008 ↗
41. Kesavamoorthi R and Ramachandra Raja C 2017 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 30 253510.1007/s10948-017-4055-z ↗
42. Ganga Swamy D R S, Chaitanya Varma M and Bharadwaj S 2015 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 29 155021810.1142/S0217979215502185 ↗
43. Ghodake J S, Shinde T J, Patil R P, Patil S B and Suryavanshie S S 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 43610.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.041 ↗
44. Hsu W C, Chen S C, Kuo P C, Lie C T and Tsai W S 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 111 14210.1016/j.mseb.2004.04.009 ↗