AC impedance measurement for the enzyme kinetics of urea–urease system: a model for impedimetric biosensor
Source abstract
Abstract
The measurement of time evolution of electrochemical impedance enables enzymatic kinetic studies in real-time, and obviates the need of using additional reagents as in many popular spectroscopic methods. This can eventually lead to the development of enzyme biosensors. We have used the urea–urease system as a model for this study. The usage of a free enzyme (without any immobilization steps) in this work makes the technique very simple and unique for electrochemical measurement on urease. The impedance vs. time measurement of urease exhibits Michaelis–Menten (MM) behaviour with the MM constant ( $$K_{\mathrm {{m}}}$$ ) of 0.8 mM and maximum velocity ( $$V_{\mathrm {{max}}}$$ ) of $$5000\hbox { ohms min}^{{{-1}}}$$ . This $$K_{\mathrm {{m}}}$$ value closely matched the one, which is obtained from the conventional colorimetric method (values). The enzyme kinetics was performed in a standard three-electrode system and reproduced in a fabricated mini electrochemical cell in an Eppendorf tube, which could pave the way for the development of impedimetric biosensors for a variety of enzyme systems, especially the ones for which spectrometric techniques cannot be readily applied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Goode J A, Rushworth J V and Millner P A 2015 Langmuir 31 626710.1021/la503533g ↗
2. Shagun M, Abhishek V, Naveen T and Vivek K 2017 IJARIIE-ISSN(O) 3 3639
3. Pratima R S, Ajeet K, Agrawal V V and Malhotra B D 2011 NPG Asia Mater. 3 1710.1038/asiamat.2010.137 ↗
4. Tanu B 2015 Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. Tech. 6 36
5. Jonathan S D and Pourmanda N 2007 Electroanalysis 19 123910.1002/elan.200603855 ↗
6. Asal M, Özen Ö, Sahinler M and Polatoglu I 2018 Sensors (Basel) 18 110.3390/s18061924 ↗
7. Hammond J L, Formisano N, Estrela P, Carrara S and Tkac J 2016 Essays Biochem. 60 6910.1042/EBC20150008 ↗
8. Cheung K C, Berardino M, Schade K G, Hebeisen M, Pierzchalski A, Bocsi J et al 2010 Cytometry A 77 64810.1002/cyto.a.20910 ↗
9. Sassolas A, Blum L J and Leca-Bouvier B D 2012 Biotechnol. Adv. 30 48910.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.003 ↗
10. Narendran S and Ramasamy R P 2013 J. Microbial. Biochem. Technol. S6 4
11. Wang Y, Zunzhong Y and Yibin Y 2012 Sensors 12 344910.3390/s120303449 ↗
12. Paliwal D K and Randhawa H S 1977 J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33 21910.1128/AEM.33.2.219-220.1977 ↗
13. Yien L, Lateef S, Jianwei L, Duy H and Jun L 2012 Anal. Chim. Acta 744 4510.1016/j.aca.2012.07.027 ↗
14. Selvamurugan C, Lavanya A and Sivasankar B 2007 J. Sci. Ind. Res. 66 655
15. Robert L B, Edwin C W and Burt Z 1969 Biochem. 8 198410.1021/bi00833a031 ↗