Electrochemical potentials of layered oxide and olivine phosphate with aluminum substitution: A first principles study
Source abstract
Abstract
First-principles prediction of enhancement in the electrochemical potential of LiCoO2 with aluminum substitution has been realized through earlier experiments. For safer and less expensive Li-ion batteries, it is desirable to have a similar enhancement for alternative cathode materials, LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4. Here, we present first-principles density functional theory based analysis of the effects of aluminum substitution on electrochemical potential of LiCoO2, LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4. While Al substitution for transition metal results in increase in electrochemical potential of LiCoO2, it leads to reduction in LiFePO4 and LiCoPO4. Through comparative topological analysis of charge density of these materials, we identify a ratio of Bader charges that correlates with electrochemical potential and determine the chemical origin of these contrasting effects: while electronic charge from lithium is transferred largely to oxygen in LiCoO2, it gets shared by the oxygen and Co/Fe in olivine phosphates due to strong covalency between O and Co/Fe. Our work shows that covalency of transition metal–oxygen bond plays a key role in determining battery potential.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Chemical Synthesis and Characterization · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Bader R F W 1990 Atoms in molecules: A quantum theory (New York: Oxford University Press)10.1093/oso/9780198551683.001.0001 ↗
2. Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev B50 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
3. Ceder G, Aydinol M K and Kohan A F 1997 Comput. Mater. Sci 8 16110.1016/S0927-0256(97)00029-3 ↗
4. Ceder G, Chiang Y M, Sadoway D R, Aydiniol M K, Jang Y I and Huang B 1998 Nature 392 69410.1038/33647 ↗
5. Ebner W, Fouchard D and Xie L 1994 Solid State Ionics 69 23810.1016/0167-2738(94)90413-8 ↗
6. Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A and Jonsson H 2006 Comput. Mater. Sci. 36 25410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
7. Humphrey W, Dalke A and Schulten K 1999 J. Mol. Graphics 14 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
8. Kang K, Meng Y S, Breger J, Grey C P and Ceder G 2006 Science 311 97710.1126/science.1122152 ↗
9. Kresse G and Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B59 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
10. Ong S P,Wang L, Kong B and Ceder G 2008 Chem. Mater. 20 179810.1021/cm702327g ↗
11. Padhi A K, Nanjundaswamy K S and Goodenough J B 1997 J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 118810.1149/1.1837571 ↗
12. Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson K A, Pederson M R, Singh D J and Fiolhais C 1992 Phys. Rev. B46 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
13. Sanville E, Kenny S D, Smith R and Henkelman G 2007 J. Comp. Chem. 28 89910.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
14. Sathiya M, Hemalatha K, Ramesha K, Shukla A K and Prakash AS 2011 Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 169310.1007/s12034-011-0379-7 ↗
15. Shalini R, Munichandraiah N and Shukla A K 2001 J. Power Sources 102 32210.1016/S0378-7753(01)00770-4 ↗
16. Tang W, Sanville E and Henkelman G 2009 J. Phys: Condens. Matter 21 084204
17. Wang Li, Zhang Liwu, Li Jianjun, Gao Jian, Jiang Changyin and He Xiangming 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 336210.1016/S1452-3981(23)13961-7 ↗
18. Zhou F, Cococcioni M, Kang K and Ceder G 2004a Electrochem. Commun. 6 114410.1016/j.elecom.2004.09.007 ↗
19. Zhou F, Kang K, Maxisch T, Ceder G and Morgan D 2004b Solid State Commun. 132 18110.1016/j.ssc.2004.07.055 ↗