journal article·2007-04

Effect of cold work and aging on mechanical properties of a copper bearing microalloyed HSLA-100 (GPT) steel

Sanjay Panwar, D. B. Goel, O. P. Pandey

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 30· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Investigations have been carried out on the effect of cold work and subsequent aging on mechanical properties of a Cu-bearing HSLA-100 steel microalloyed with Nb and Ti. Aging at 400°C after various degrees of cold work (25–70 pct) exhibits multiple hardness peaks. The treatments cause significant improvement in hardness and tensile strength, but at the cost of impact strength. Cold work also causes deterioration in ductility, which again improves on subsequent aging. The C70A treatment involving 70 pct deformation exhibits maximum response to age hardening giving a hardness of 465 VHN and a UTS of 1344 MPa, but with low values of ductility (5 pct) and impact energy (24 J). C50A treatment involving 50 pct cold work and aging results in an optimum combination of mechanical properties. This treatment in the second hardness peak stage yields a hardness of 373 VHN, UTS of 1186 MPa together with a ductility value of 11 pct and impact energy of 109 J. Scanning electron microscopic studies of fracture surfaces reveal that the impact fracture occurs by formation of dimples and nucleation and growth of voids and cracks. Fracture in tensile specimens is caused by formation of voids and cracks at high density striations. Formation of voids and cracks is also assisted by the presence of precipitated carbide particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Bakkaloglu A 2002 Mater. Letts. 56 20010.1016/S0167-577X(02)00440-8 ↗
2. Bhagat A N, Pabi S K, Ranganathan S and Mohanty O N 2004 ISIJ Int. 44 11510.2355/isijinternational.44.115 ↗
3. Bhole S D, Nemade J B, Collins L and Liu C 2006 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 173 9210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.10.028 ↗
4. Cutler L R 1979 in Copper in iron and steel (eds) L McDonald Schetky and I LeMay (New York: John-Wiley & Sons) p. 26
5. Czyryca E J 1993 Key engineering materials (Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland: Trans. Tech. Publication) 84–85 p. 491
6. Dhua S K, Mukerjee D and Sarma D S 2001 Metall. Mater. Trans. A32 225910.1007/s11661-001-0201-z ↗
7. Fernandez J, Illescas S and Guilemany J M 2006 Mater. Letts (www.sciencedirect.com)
8. Furugimi O, Nkano Y, Ueda S and Tanaka T 1986 J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn (Tetsu-to-Hagane) 72 162110.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.10_1621 ↗
9. Ghosh A, Das S, Chatterjee S, Mishra B and Ramachandra Rao P 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. A348 29910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00735-9 ↗
10. Ghosh A, Mishra B, Das S and Chatterjee S 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. A374 4310.1016/j.msea.2003.11.047 ↗
11. Ghosh A, Das S, Chatterjee S and Ramachandra Rao P 2006 Mater. Charact. 56 5910.1016/j.matchar.2005.09.014 ↗
12. Hausild P and Berdin C 2002 in Transferability of fracture mechanical characteristics (ed.) I Dlouhy (Dordrecht: Kluver Academic) p. 167
13. Ingelbriech D 1985 J. Mater. Sci. 21 303410.1007/BF00553070 ↗
14. Kim J I, Syn C K and Moriss J W Jr 1983 Metall. Trans. A14 9310.1007/BF02643742 ↗
15. Kim S J, Lee C G, Choi I and Lee S 2001 Metall. Mater. Trans. A32 50510.1007/s11661-001-0067-0 ↗
16. Krishnadev M R and Cutler L R 1979 in Copper in iron and steel (eds) L McDonald Schetky and I LeMay (New York: John-Wiley & Sons) p. 26
17. Mao W, Ren H and Yu Y 2004 Z. Metallkd 95 5710.3139/146.017912 ↗
18. Maropoulos S and Ridley N 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. A384 6410.1016/j.msea.2004.05.023 ↗
19. Nakada N, Syarif J, Tsuchiyama T and Takaki S 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. A374 13710.1016/j.msea.2004.01.048 ↗
20. Panwar S, Goel D B, Pandey O P and Prasad K S 2003 Bull. Mater. Sci. 26 44110.1007/BF02711190 ↗
21. Panwar S, Goel D B and Pandey O P 2005 Bull. Mater. Sci. 28 25910.1007/BF02711258 ↗
22. Panwar S, Goel D B, Pandey O P and Prasad K S 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 28110.1007/BF02706498 ↗
23. Prasad S N and Sarma D S 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. A408 5310.1016/j.msea.2005.06.018 ↗
24. Reip C P, Shanmugam S and Misra R D K 2006 Mater. Sci. Eng. A424 30710.1016/j.msea.2006.03.026 ↗
25. Skoufari-Themistou L, Crowther D N and Mintz B 1999 Mater. Sci. Technol. 15 106910.1179/026708399101506797 ↗
26. Suenaga H, Fukai H, Takamatsu F and Ouchi C 1987 J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn (Tetsu-to-Hagane) S73 1510
27. Sugimoto K I, Muramatsu T, Hashimoto S I and Mukadi Y 2006 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 177 39010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.186 ↗
28. Uhashi N 1986 J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn (Tetsu-to-Hagane) 72 74710.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.7_747 ↗