Preparation and properties of Pr3+/Ce3+:YAG phosphors using triethanolamine as dispersant and pH regulator
Source abstract
Abstract
Pr3+/Ce3+:YAG precursors were co-precipitated using triethanolamine as dispersant and pH regulator. The different dosages of triethanolamine (D) vs. the properties of Pr3+/Ce3+:YAG phosphors were discussed. When D = 0.5 vol%, the pH of titration process was controlled in the range of ∼7.94–8.16 to guarantee the uniform distribution of Al, Y, Ce and Pr in the precursors. The relatively higher pH could decrease the loss of Ce and Pr in the precursors and increase the particle size of the obtained powders, which was beneficial to the enhancement of luminescent intensity. Therefore, the precursors directly converted to pure-phase YAG at 900°C, and the phosphors calcined at 1000°C showed the best dispersity due to the dispersion effect of triethanolamine and the most excellent luminescent property. When D ≥ 2 vol%, although pure-phase YAG was detected, the emission intensity of the phosphors decreased due to the decrease of dispersity and purity. Moreover, the co-doped Pr3+ enhanced the red emission of Pr3+/Ce3+:YAG phosphors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Lu J R, Song J, Prabhu M et al 2000 Japanese J. Appl. Phys. 39 L104810.1143/JJAP.39.L1048 ↗
2. Yang H, Qin X P, Zhang J, Ma J, Tang D Y, Wang S W and Zhang Q T 2012 Opt. Mater. 34 94010.1016/j.optmat.2011.05.029 ↗
3. Tang F, Cao Y G, Huang J Q, Liu H G, Guo W and Wang W C 2012 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 5610.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04956.x ↗
4. Cavalli E, Esposito L, Hostasa J and Pedroni M 2013 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33 142510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.01.012 ↗
5. Potdevin A, Chadeyron G, Boyer D and Mahiou R 2007 Physica Status Solidi C 4 6510.1002/pssc.200673550 ↗
6. Nishiura S, Tanabe S, Fujioka K and Fujimoto Y 2011 Opt. Mater. 33 68810.1016/j.optmat.2010.06.005 ↗
7. Wei N, Lu T C, Li F et al 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 061902–061902-4
8. Zeng M, Ma Y J, Wang Y H and Pei C H 2012 Ceram. Int. 38 695110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.066 ↗
9. Tong S H, Lu T C and Guo W 2007 Mater. Lett. 61 428710.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.087 ↗
10. Li J G, Ikegami T, Lee J H, Mori T and Yajima Y 2000 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 20 239510.1016/S0955-2219(00)00116-3 ↗
11. Wang H Z, Gao L and Niihara K 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 288 110.1016/S0921-5093(00)00904-7 ↗
12. Palmero P, Esnouf C, Montanaro L and Fantozzi G 2005 , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25 156510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.05.027 ↗
13. Liu W B, Zhang W X, Li J et al 2010 J. Alloy Compd. 503 52510.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.048 ↗
14. Sang Y H, Lv Y, Qin H, Zhang X, Liu H and Boughton R I 2012 Ceram. Int. 38 163510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.09.054 ↗
15. Li J G, Ikegami T, Lee J H and Mori T 2000 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83 96110.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01305.x ↗
16. Xu G, Zhang X D, He W et al 2006 Mater. Lett. 60 96210.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.052 ↗
17. Li X, Liu H, Wang J Y, Cui H M, Zhang X D and Han F 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 379 34710.1016/j.msea.2004.03.014 ↗
18. Li J S, Sun X D, Liu S H, Li X D, Li J G and Huo D 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 328310.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.076 ↗
19. Zhang K, Liu H Z, Wu Y T and Hu W B 2008 J. Alloys Comp. 453 26510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.101 ↗
20. Zhao D L, Yang Q, Han Z H, Sun F Y, Tang K B and Yu F 2008 Solid State Sci. 10 102810.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2007.11.019 ↗