Microrheology of concentrated DNA solutions using optical tweezers
Source abstract
Abstract
Semiflexible biopolymers play a vital role in shaping cellular structure and rigidity. In this work, we report the determination of microrheological properties of concentrated, double-stranded calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) solutions using passive, laser-scattering based particle-tracking methodology. From power spectral analysis, we obtain dynamic shear moduli of the polymer solutions stretching over three decades of frequency (100–103 Hz) and over concentration ranges spanning from very dilute to concentrated regime. We also study the effects of altered ionic strength and denaturation on the shear modulus. Our results indicate that (CT-DNA) exhibits predominantly elastic behaviour in the concentration range we probed. From the measurements of the plateau shear modulus, G p, we conclude that DNA generally behaves like a semiflexible polymer in a good solvent even at low ionic strength. We have thus demonstrated application of passive microrheological method using optical tweezers to DNA solutions. Further extensions of the technique and its applications are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Blood properties and coagulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Addas K M, Schmidt C F and Tang J X 2004 Phys. Rev. E70 02150310.1103/PhysRevE.70.021503 ↗
2. Bandopadhyay R and Sood A K 2002 Pramana-J. Phys. 58 68510.1007/s12043-002-0025-4 ↗
3. Baumann C G, Smith S B, Bloomfield V A and Bustamante C 1997 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94 618510.1073/pnas.94.12.6185 ↗
4. Boal D 2002 Mechanics of the cell (Oxford, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
5. Buchanan M, Atakhorrami M, Palierne J F, MacKintosh F C and Schmidt C F 2005 Phys. Rev. E72 01150410.1103/PhysRevE.72.011504 ↗
6. Doi M and Edwards S F 1989 The theory of polymer dynamics (Oxford: Clarendon)
7. Gittes F, Schnurr B, Olmsted P D, MacKintosh F C and Schmidt C F 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 328610.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3286 ↗
8. Goodman A, Tseng Y and Wirtz D 2002 J. Mol. Biol. 323 19910.1016/S0022-2836(02)00893-8 ↗
9. Mason T G 2000 Rheol. Acta 39 37110.1007/s003970000094 ↗
10. Mason T G, Ganesan K, van Zenten J H, Wirtz D and Kuo S C 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 328210.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3282 ↗
11. Mason T G, Dhople A and Wirtz D 1998 Macromolecules 31 360010.1021/ma970564w ↗
12. Schnurr B, Gittes F, MacKintosh F C and Schmidt C F 1998 Macromolecules 30 778110.1021/ma970555n ↗
13. Waigh T A 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 68510.1088/0034-4885/68/3/R04 ↗
14. Wenner J R, Williams M C, Rouzina I and Bloomfield V A 2002 Biophys. J. 82 316010.1016/S0006-3495(02)75658-0 ↗
15. Yamada S, Wirtz D and Kuo S C 2000 Biophys. J. 78 173610.1016/S0006-3495(00)76725-7 ↗