Impedance spectroscopy studies of surface engineered TiO2 nanoparticles using slurry technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Dielectric analysis of nanometre range size ceramic particles like TiO2 is very important in the understanding of the performance and design of their polymer nanocomposites for energy storage and other applications. In recent times, impedance spectroscopy is shown to be a very powerful tool to investigate the dielectric characteristics of not only sintered and/or pelleted ceramic materials but also particulates/powders (both micron-sized and nano-sized) using the slurry technique. In the present work, impedance spectroscopy employing slurry methodology was extended to study the influence of various chemical groups on the nanoTiO2 surface on the electrical resistivity and the dielectric permittivity of nanoparticles. In this regard, different organophosphate ligands with linear, aromatic and extended aromatic nature of organic groups were employed to remediate the surface effects of nanoTiO2. It was observed that the type of chemical nature of surface engineered nanoparticles’ surface played significant role in controlling the surface electrical resistivity of nanoparticles. Surface passivated nanoTiO2 yielded dielectric permittivity of about 70–80, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Marinel S, Choi D H, Heuguet R, Agrawal D and Lanagan M 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 29910.1016/j.ceramint.2012.06.025 ↗
2. Chao S, Petrovsky V and Dogan F 2010 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 303110.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04008.x ↗
3. Wada S, Kondo S, Moriyoshi C and Kuroiwa Y 2008 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 761210.1143/JJAP.47.7612 ↗
4. Tsurumi T, Sekine T, Kakemoto H, Hoshina T, Nam S -M, Yasuno H and Wada S 2006 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 133710.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00905.x ↗
5. Siddabattuni S, Schuman T P and Dogan F 2011 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 176 142210.1016/j.mseb.2011.07.025 ↗
6. Petrovsky V, Petrovsky T, Kamlapurkar S and Dogan F 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 181410.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02255.x ↗
7. Chang K C, Yeh Y C and Lue J T 2012 Measurement 45 80810.1016/j.measurement.2011.06.021 ↗
8. Wada S, Yasuno H, Hoshina T, Nam S -M, Kakemoto H and Tsurumi T 2003 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 618810.1143/JJAP.42.6188 ↗
9. Wada S, Hoshino T, Yasuno H, Ohishi M, Kakemoto H, Tsurumi T and Yashima M 2005 Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 26 8910.1002/9780470291252.ch9 ↗
10. Tsurumi T, Sekine T, Kakemoto H, Hoshina T, Nam S -M, Yasuno H and Wada S 2005 Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 833 243
11. Manohar A and Dogan F 2005 Ceramic transactions, advances in electronic and electrochemical ceramics (eds) F Dogan and P Kumta (Westerville, OH: The American Ceramic Society) p 9310.1002/9781118407899.ch10 ↗
12. Petrovsky V and Dogan F 2009 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 105410.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.02982.x ↗
13. Petrovsky V, Petrovsky T, Kamlapurkar S and Dogan F 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 181710.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02256.x ↗
14. Petrovsky V, Manohar A and Dogan F 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 014102–110.1063/1.2206411 ↗
15. Petrovsky V, Petrovsky T, Kamlapurkar S and Dogan F 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 359010.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02693.x ↗
16. Jasinski P, Petrovsky V and Dogan F 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 074111–110.1063/1.3486461 ↗
17. Petrovsky V, Jasinski P and Dogan F 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 034107–110.1063/1.4743985 ↗
18. Zhou W, Hinojosa B B and Nino J C 2012 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 45710.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.05010.x ↗
19. Siddabattuni S, Schuman T P, Petrovsky V and Dogan F 2013 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96 149010.1111/jace.12203 ↗
20. Siddabattuni S, Schuman T P and Dogan F 2013 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 191710.1021/am3030239 ↗
21. Porkodi K and Arokiamary S D 2007 Mater. Charact. 58 49510.1016/j.matchar.2006.04.019 ↗
22. Schuman T P, Siddabattuni S, Cox O and Dogan F 2010 Compos. Interface 17 71910.1163/092764410X495315 ↗
23. Mutin P H, Guerrero G and Vioux A 2005 J. Mater. Chem. 15 376110.1039/b505422b ↗
24. Gao W, Dickinson L, Grozinger C, Morin F G and Reven L 1996 Langmuir 12 642910.1021/la9607621 ↗
25. Reid D L, Russo A E, Carro R V, Stephens M A, LePage A R, Spalding T C, Petersen E L and Seal S 2007 Nano Lett. 7 215710.1021/nl0625372 ↗
26. Geng H, Peng R, Han S, Gu X and Wang M 2010 J. Electron. Mater. 39 234610.1007/s11664-010-1137-0 ↗
27. Helmy R and Fadeev A Y 2002 Langmuir 18 892410.1021/la0262506 ↗
28. Moreno-Castilla C, Maldonado-Hódar F J, Carrasco-Marín F and Rodríguez-Castellón E 2002 Langmuir 18 229510.1021/la011595u ↗
29. Viornery C, Chevolot Y, Léonard D, Aronsson B -O, Péchy P, Mathieu H J, Descouts P and Grätzel M 2002 Langmuir 18 258210.1021/la010908i ↗
30. Leroy P, Tournassat C and Bizi M 2011 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 356 44210.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.016 ↗
31. Fernandez-Garcia M and Rodriguez J A 2009 Nanomaterials: inorganic and bioinorganic perspectives (eds) C M Lukehart and R A Scott (New York: Wiley) p 453
32. Lazzeri M, Vittadini A and Selloni A 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 15540910.1103/PhysRevB.63.155409 ↗
33. Zhang H and Bandfield J F 1998 J. Mater. Chem. 8 207310.1039/a802619j ↗
34. Macomber R 1996 Organic chemistry (California, CA: University Science Books) Vol 1, p 267
35. Chester T L and Pinkston J D 2005 Analytical instrumentation handbook (ed) J Cazes (New York: Marcel Dekker) 3rd ed, p 75910.1201/9780849390395.ch24 ↗