Influence of steady shear flow on dynamic viscoelastic properties of un-reinforced and Kevlar, glass fibre reinforced LLDPE
Source abstract
Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to observe the effects of parallel-superposed flow condition on viscoelastic properties of LLDPE, Kevlar fibre reinforced LLDPE and hybrid of short glass fibre and Kevlar fibre reinforced LLDPE. Parallel-plate rheometer was employed for these tests. Rheological parameters such as loss modulus (G″) and dynamic viscosity (η′) do not vary significantly on superposing steady state shear with oscillatory shear in the studied range of experiment at 185°C in un-reinforced LLDPE. Kevlar fibre reinforced LLDPE and Kevlar/glass fibre reinforced LLDPE showed significant changes in the flow behaviour under various sets of superposed conditions. Storage modulus (G′), andG″ become highly sensitive to low oscillatory angular frequencies (ω) under superposed conditions. These curves show two different regions with increased ω value. At low ω values, parametersG′ andG″ change sharply reaching a certain value, thereafter, changes are moderate with increased ω. In case of η′ a maxima is observed, position of which, depends upon the value of steady shear rate. Maxima shifts towards higher frequencies with the increased steady shear rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Amari T, Wei X and Watanabe K 1992Theoretical and applied rheology, Proc. XIth Int. Congress on Rheology (eds) P. Moldenaers and R Keunings (Brussels: Elsevier Science Pub- lisher) p. 57310.1016/B978-0-444-89007-8.50247-1 ↗
2. Booij H C and Palmen J H M 1982Rheol. Acta 21 37610.1007/BF01534297 ↗
3. Hashmi S A R, Kitano T and Chand N 2002Polym. Compos. 23 50010.1002/pc.10451 ↗
4. Hashmi S A R, Kitano T and Chand N 2003Polym. Compos. 24 14910.1002/pc.10015 ↗
5. Isayev A I and Wong C M 1988J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 26 230310.1002/polb.1988.090261110 ↗
6. Kataoka T, Ohnishi S, Kitano T, Nakama K and Takayama H 1976Rheol. Acta 15 26810.1007/BF01521127 ↗
7. Kitano T, Hashmi S A R and Chand N 2001Appl. Rheol. 11 25810.1515/arh-2001-0014 ↗
8. Masi P, Nicodemo L, Nicolais L and Taglialatela G 1982Rheol. Acta 21 59810.1007/BF01534356 ↗
9. McKenna G B and Zapas L J 1986Polym. Eng. Sci. 26 72510.1002/pen.760261103 ↗
10. Osaki K, Tamura M, Kurata M and Kotaka T 1965J. Phys. Chem. 69 4185
11. Pipkin A C 1968Trans. Soc. Rheol. 12 39710.1122/1.549113 ↗
12. Pipkin A C and Owen D R 1967Phys. Fluids 10 83610.1063/1.1762197 ↗
13. Powel R L and Schwarz W H 1979J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 17 96910.1002/pol.1979.180170607 ↗
14. Wong C M and Isayev A I 1989Rheol. Acta 28 17610.1007/BF01356978 ↗
15. Wong C M, Chen C H and Isayev A I 1990Polym. Eng. Sci. 30 157410.1002/pen.760302404 ↗