Effect of nanocrystalline surface of substrate on microstructure and wetting of PEO coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
In this research, effect of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) was studied on characteristics of the coatings formed using plasma electrolyte oxidation (PEO) on AA1230 aluminium. To do so, first, the samples were coated with and without SMAT pre-process. Coating by PEO method was carried out in two phosphate-based and silicate-based suspensions of silicon nitride nanoparticles for 10 min. Next, to study the distribution of the nanoparticles and elements inside the coating, surface morphology of the samples was examined using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy. In addition, wettability test was performed on all samples using the deionized water. Also, droplet expansion manner on the porous oxide coating surface and its relation with fine structure of the coating was investigated. The results indicated that samples coated in silicate-based electrolyte have a relatively rougher microstructure as compared to samples coated in phosphate-based electrolyte. The average surface pores area percentage of the samples coated in silicate-based electrolytes was 13.9% greater than that of samples coated in phosphate-based electrolyte. Moreover, the average height to diameter (h/d) value obtained from wettability test for samples coated in silicate-based electrolyte was 13.3% greater than that of phosphate-based electrolyte.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Etefagh R, Shahtahmasebi N and Karimipour M 2013 Bull. Mater. Sci. 36 41110.1007/s12034-013-0481-0 ↗
2. Gupta G, Moon A P and Mondal K 2013 Bull. Mater. Sci. 36 5110.1007/s12034-013-0437-4 ↗
3. Neelgund G M, Shivashankar S A, Chethana B K, Sahoo P P and Rao K J 2013, Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 116310.1007/s12034-011-0165-6 ↗
4. Saravanan M, Pillai R M, Pai B C, Brahmakumar M and Ravi K R 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 679
5. Cao Y, Wang Y B, Chen Z B, Liao X Z, Kawasaki M, Ringer S P et al 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 578 11010.1016/j.msea.2013.04.075 ↗
6. Bonnot E, Helbert A L, Brisset F and Baudin T 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 561 6010.1016/j.msea.2012.11.017 ↗
7. Kaune V and Muller C 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 535 110.1016/j.msea.2011.12.012 ↗
8. Chen A Y, Li D F, Zhang J B, Liu F, Liu X R and Lu J 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 838910.1016/j.msea.2011.07.063 ↗
9. Aliofkhazraei M, Rouhaghdam A S and Gupta P 2011 Crit. Rev. Solid State and Mater. Sci. 36 17410.1080/10408436.2011.593269 ↗
10. Yerokhin A L, Snizhko L O, Gurevina N L, Leyland A, Pilkington A and Matthews A 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 211010.1088/0022-3727/36/17/314 ↗
11. Kim C W, Choi J H, Kim H J, Lee D W, Hyun C Y and Nam S M 2013 Ceram. Int. 38 562110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.003 ↗
12. Shen M J, Wang X J and Zhang M F 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 259 36210.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.052 ↗
13. Shin K R, Ko Y G and Shin D H 2013 J. Alloys Comp. 536 S22610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.037 ↗
14. Athauda T J, Williams W, Roberts K P and Ozer R R 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 611510.1007/s10853-013-7407-5 ↗
15. Li Z, Zheng Y, Zhao J and Cui L 2013 J. Thermal Spray Technol. 21 25510.1007/s11666-011-9728-8 ↗
16. Psarski M, Celichowski G, Marczak J, Gumowski K and Sobieraj G B 2013 Surf. Coat. Tech. 225 6610.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.03.017 ↗
17. Hao G, Guo Y, Liu G and Zhang X M 2013 Adv. Mater. Res. 105–106 6710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.724-725.67 ↗
18. Wen L, Wang Y, Jin Y and Sun D 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 41910.1088/1742-6596/419/1/012015 ↗
19. Zhang J and Hao G 2013 Adv. Mater. Res. 146–147 1821
20. Malayoglu U, Tekin K C and Shrestha S 2013 Surf. Coat. Technol. 205 179310.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.022 ↗
21. Sreekanth D, Rameshbabu N, Choudary K R and Rao K P 2013, Mater. Sci. Forum 710 68310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.710.683 ↗
22. Tarakci M 2013, Mater. Charact. 62 121410.1016/j.matchar.2011.10.010 ↗
23. Wang L, Chen L and Fu W 2013 Adv. Mater. Res. 168–170 1203
24. Lv G, Gu W, Chen H, Feng W, Khosa M L, Li L et al 2006 Appl. Surf. Sci. 253 294710.1016/j.apsusc.2006.06.036 ↗
25. Wei-Chao G, Guo-Hua L, Huan C, Guang-Liang C, Wen-Ran F, Gu-Ling Z et al 2007 J. Mater. Process. Tech. 182 2810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.002 ↗
26. Aliofkhazraei M and Rouhaghdam A S 2012 Electrochem. Commun. 20 8810.1016/j.elecom.2012.02.033 ↗
27. Matykina E, Arrabal R, Monfort F, Skeldon P and Thompson G E 2008 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 283010.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.036 ↗
28. Necula B S, Fratila-Apachitei L E, Berkani A, Apachitei I and Duszczyk J 2009 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 20 339
29. Necula B S, Apachitei I, Tichelaar F D, Fratila-Apachitei L E and Duszczyk J 2013 Acta Biomaterialia 7 275110.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.037 ↗
30. Bedi R S, Chow G, Wang J, Zanello L and Yan Y S 2013 Adv. Eng. Mater. 14 20010.1002/adem.201100170 ↗
31. Kim C, Kendall M R, Miller M A, Long C L, Larson P R, Humphrey M B et al 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33 32710.1016/j.msec.2012.08.047 ↗
32. Sheng Y, Tang X and Xue J 2013 J. Mater. Chem. 22 129010.1039/C1JM14794C ↗
33. Thian E S, Chang L, Lim P N, Gurucharan B, Sun J, Fuh J Y H et al 2013 Surf. Coat. Tech. 231 2910.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.057 ↗