Reactivity and resizing of gold nanorods in presence of Cu2+
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the inherent anisotropy of the system, gold nanorods behave differently in comparison to their spherical counterparts. Reactivity of gold nanorods, in presence of cupric ions, was probed in an attempt to understand the chemistry of anisotropic particles. The reaction progresses through a series of intermediates. It can be arrested at any stage to get nanorods of desired dimension and therefore, can be used for their reshaping. The presence or absence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on the nanorod surface was found to be determining the site of initiation of the reaction. When a large concentration of CTAB is present in the system, selective etching of the tips of the nanorod occurs and when the nanorods are purified to reduce the amount of CTAB in the solution, the side faces of the nanorod also get reacted. Gold nanorods are converted to particles by further surface reconstructions in a systematic surface specific chemistry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Asplund K U M, Jansson P J, Lindqvist C and Nordström T 2002 Free Radical Res. 36 127110.1080/1071576021000036425 ↗
2. Bruck R, Shirin H, Aeed H, Matas Z, Hochman A, Pines M and Avni Y 2001 J. Hepatol. 35 45710.1016/S0168-8278(01)00163-5 ↗
3. Carretero A S, Blanco C C, Diaz B C and Gutiérrez A F 1998 Anal. Chim. Acta 361 21710.1016/S0003-2670(98)00026-9 ↗
4. Chang S-S, Shih C-W, Chen C-D, Lai W-C and Wang C R C 1999 Langmuir 15 70110.1021/la980929l ↗
5. Foss Jr C A, Hornyak G L, Stockert J A and Martin C R 1992 J. Phys. Chem. 96 749710.1021/j100198a004 ↗
6. Jana N R, Gearheart L, Obare S O and Murphy C J 2002 Langmuir 18 92210.1021/la0114530 ↗
7. Jin Y and Friedman N 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 1190210.1021/ja052896j ↗
8. Juste J P, Santos I P, Liz-Marzan L M and Mulvaney P 2005 Coord. Chem. Rev. 249 187010.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.030 ↗
9. Kadiiska M B, Hanna P M, Hernandez L and Mason R P 1992 Mol. Pharmacol. 42 72310.1016/S0026-895X(25)09046-7 ↗
10. Kim F, Song J H and Yang P 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 1431610.1021/ja028110o ↗
11. Kline T R, Paxton W F, Mallouk T E and Sen A 2005 Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44 74410.1002/anie.200461890 ↗
12. Koppenol W H and Liebman J F 1984 J. Phys. Chem. 88 9910.1021/j150645a024 ↗
13. Link S, Burda C, Nikoobakht B and El-Sayed M A 2000 J. Phys. Chem. B104 615210.1021/jp000679t ↗
14. Liu F-K, Chang Y-C, Ko F-H and Chu T-C 2004 Mater. Lett. 58 37310.1016/S0167-577X(03)00504-4 ↗
15. Martin C R 1996 Chem. Mater. 8 173910.1021/cm960166s ↗
16. Mohamed M B, Ismail K Z, Link S and El-Sayed M A 1998 J. Phys. Chem. B102 937010.1021/jp9831482 ↗
17. Nair A S 2006 Chemistry of halocarbons with bare and protected silver and gold nanoparticles, Ph D Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
18. Nair A S and Pradeep T 2003 Curr. Sci. 84 1560
19. Nair A S and Pradeep T 2004 Indian Patent No. 51/CHE/2004
20. Nair A S and Pradeep T 2007 International Patent PCT application no. PCT/IN05/00022
21. Norberg N S, Dalpian G M, Chelikowsky J R and Gamelin D R 2006 Nano Lett. 6 288710.1021/nl062153b ↗
22. Prakash A, McCormick A V and Zachariah M R 2005 Nano Lett. 5 135710.1021/nl0506251 ↗
23. Rajeev Kumar V R, Samal A K, Sreeprasad T S and Pradeep T 2007 Langmuir 23 866710.1021/la701028a ↗
24. Rao C N R, Kulkarni G U, Thomas P J and Edwards P P 2000 Chem. Soc. Rev. 28 2710.1039/a904518j ↗
25. Rodriguez-Fernandez J, Perez-Juste J, Mulvaney P and Liz-Marzan L M 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B109 1425710.1021/jp052516g ↗
26. Salem A K, Searson P C and Leong K W 2003 Nat. Mater. 2 66810.1038/nmat974 ↗
27. Sau T K and Murphy C J 2004 Langmuir 20 641410.1021/la049463z ↗
28. Smith E A and Corn R M 2003 Appl. Spectrosc. 57 320A10.1366/000370203322554446 ↗
29. Song D K, Lenggoro I W, Hayashi Y, Okuyama K and Kim S S 2005 Langmuir 21 1037510.1021/la0513196 ↗
30. Sreeprasad T S, Samal A K and Pradeep T 2007 Langmuir 23 946310.1021/la700851x ↗
31. Subramaniam C, Pradeep T and Chakrabarti J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 16450110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.164501 ↗
32. Subramaniam C, Pradeep T and Chakrabarti J 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C111 1910310.1021/jp074238m ↗
33. Todd B D and Lynden-Bell R M 1993 Surf. Sci. 281 19110.1016/0039-6028(93)90868-K ↗
34. Tom R T, Samal A K, Sreeprasad T S and Pradeep T 2007 Langmuir 23 132010.1021/la061150b ↗
35. Tsung C K, Kou X, Shi Q, Zhang J, Yeung M H, Wang J and Stucky G D 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 535210.1021/ja060447t ↗
36. Uppenbrink J, Johnston R L and Murrell J N 1994 Surf. Sci. 304 22310.1016/0039-6028(94)90767-6 ↗
37. Wang Z L, Gao R P, Nikoobakht B and El-Sayed M A 2000 J. Phys. Chem. B104 541710.1021/jp000800w ↗
38. Yu Y Y, Chang S S, Lee C L and Wang C R C 1997 J. Phys. Chem. B101 666110.1021/jp971656q ↗
39. Zhan B-Z, White M A, Lumsden M, Mueller-Neuhaus J, Robertson K N, Cameron T S and Gharghouri M 2002 Chem. Mater. 14 363610.1021/cm011635f ↗