Effect of cold work and aging on mechanical properties of a copper bearing HSLA-100 steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Influence of cold working and aging on the mechanical properties of a Cu-bearing HSLA-100 steel has been studied. The steel was given solution treatment at 1000°C, followed by cold rolling to 25, 50 and 80 pct deformations and aging at 600°C for various durations. Substantial improvement in hardness and UTS was observed in the peak aged condition of various treatments, but at the expense of ductility and impact-energy. Extensive scanning electron microscopic studies carried out on impact and tensile fracture surfaces suggest that poor impact energy and low ductility in peak aged condition could be associated with inhomogeneous deformation caused by the existence of coherent precipitates. Other parameters adversely affecting toughness and ductility in various stages of cold work and aging may include high stress concentration at high density dislocation network and dislocation-precipitate interface. Overaging in various treatments resulted in higher impact energy and ductility, presumably due to existence of incoherent precipitates and reduction in stress concentration at dislocation cell boundaries. It is observed that a good combination of high hardness and UTS with high impact energy and ductility could be obtained by a treatment suitable to cause coexistence of coherent and incoherent precipitates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Czyryca E J 1993Key engineering materials (Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland: Trans. Tech. Publication)84–85 p. 491
2. Dhua S K, Mukerjee D and Sarma D S 2001Metall. Mater. Trans. A32 225910.1007/s11661-001-0201-z ↗
3. Duggan B J and Roberts W T 1973Met. Sci. J. 7 13310.1179/030634573790445415 ↗
4. Furugimi O, Nkano Y, Ueda S and Tanaka T 1986J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. (Tetsu to-Hagane) 72 162110.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.10_1621 ↗
5. Ghosh A, Das S, Chatterjee S, Mishra B and Ramachandra Rao P 2003Mater. Sci. Eng. A348 29910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00735-9 ↗
6. Ghosh A, Mishra B, Das S and Chatterjee S 2004Mater. Sci. Eng. A374 4310.1016/j.msea.2003.11.047 ↗
7. Hamano R 1993Metall. Trans. A24 12710.1007/BF02669610 ↗
8. Hornbogen E and Glenn R C 1960TMS-AIME 208 1064
9. Ingelbriech D 1985J. Mater. Sci. 21 303410.1007/BF00553070 ↗
10. Kim J I, Syn C K and Morris J W Jr 1983Metall. Trans. A14 9310.1007/BF02643742 ↗
11. Kim S J, Lee C G, Choi I and Lee S 2001Metall. Mater. Trans. A32 50510.1007/s11661-001-0067-0 ↗
12. Kostic M M, Collins L E, Kapoor A and O’hara R D 1998Proc. int. pipelines conf. (NewYork: ASME) 1 p. 665
13. Mao W, Ren H and Yu Y 2004Z.Metallkd. 95 5710.3139/146.017912 ↗
14. Miglin M T, Hirth J P and Rosenfield A R 1983Metall. Trans. A14 205510.1007/BF02662372 ↗
15. Nakada N, Syarif J, Tsuchiyama T and Takaki S 2004Mater. Sci. Eng. 374 13710.1016/j.msea.2004.01.048 ↗
16. Okatsu M, Kawabata F and Amano K 1997Proc. OMAE, ASME New York 3 p. 119
17. Panwar S, Goel D B, Pandey O P and Prasad K S 2003Bull. Mater. Sci. 26 44110.1007/BF02711190 ↗
18. Skoufari-Themistou L, Crowther D N and Mintz B 1999Mater. Sci. Technol. 15 106910.1179/026708399101506797 ↗
19. Soeno K 1970Trans. JIM 11 18510.2320/matertrans1960.11.185 ↗
20. Suenaga H, Fukai H, Takamatsu H and Ouchi C 1987J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. (Tetsu-to-Hagane) 73 S1510
21. Uhashi N 1986J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. (Tetsu-to-Hagane) 72 74710.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.7_747 ↗
22. Vasseur E, Di Fant M, Danielou A and Streisselberger A 1997Proc. mechanical working and steel processing conf. (Warrendale, PA: ISS-AIME) p. 503
23. Wilson E A 1968JISI 206 164