journal article·2008-04

Electrical resistivity measurements to predict abrasion resistance of rock aggregates

Sair Kahraman, Mustafa Fener

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 31· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The prediction of Los Angeles (LA) abrasion loss from some indirect tests is useful for practical applications. For this purpose, LA abrasion, electrical resistivity, density and porosity tests were carried out on 27 different rock types. LA abrasion loss values were correlated with electrical resistivity and a good correlation between the two parameters was found. To see the effect of rock class on the correlation, regression analysis was repeated for igneous rocks, metamorphic rocks and sedimentary rocks, respectively. It was seen that correlation coefficients were increased for the rock classes. In addition, the data were divided into two groups according to porosity and density, respectively. After repeating regression analysis for these porosity and density groups, stronger correlations were obtained compared to the equation derived for all rocks. The validity of the derived equations was statistically tested and it was shown that all derived equations were significant. Finally, it can be said that all derived equations can alternatively be used for the estimation of LA abrasion loss from electrical resistivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Harthi A A 2001 Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 60 19310.1007/s100640100107 ↗
2. Archie G E 1942 Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petrol Eng. 146 54
3. Ballivy G and Dayre M 1984 Int. Ass. Eng. Geol. Bull. 29 33910.1007/BF02594432 ↗
4. Cargill J S and Shakoor A 1990 Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 27 49510.1016/0148-9062(90)91001-N ↗
5. David C and Marot M 1989 Proc. ISRM-SPE int. symp. rock at great depth (Rotterdam: Balkema) Vol. 1, pp. 203–209
6. Kahraman S and Fener M 2007 Mater. Lett. 61 486110.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.003 ↗
7. Kahraman S and Gunaydin O 2007 Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 66 44910.1007/s10064-007-0093-2 ↗
8. Kasim M and Shakoor A 1996 Eng. Geol. 44 21310.1016/S0013-7952(96)00073-7 ↗
9. Kazi A and Al-Mansour L R 1980 Q. J. Eng. Geol. 13 4510.1144/GSL.QJEG.1980.013.01.03 ↗
10. Keller G V and Frischknecht F C 1966 Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting (New York: Pergamon Press)
11. Kermabon A, Gehin C and Blavier P 1969 Geophys. 34 55410.1190/1.1440031 ↗
12. Shakoor A and Brown C L 1996 Int. Ass. Eng. Geol. Bull. 53 98