journal article·2008-08

Thermally stimulated luminescence studies in combustion synthesized polycrystalline aluminum oxide

K. R. Nagabhushana, B. N. Lakshminarasappa, D. Revannasiddaiah, Fouran Singh

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 31· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Synthesis of materials by combustion technique results in homogeneous and fine crystalline product. Further, the technique became more popular since it not only saved time and energy but also was easy to process. Aluminum oxide phosphor was synthesized by using urea as fuel in combustion reaction. Photoluminescence (PL) and thermally stimulated luminescence (TSL) characteristics of γ-irradiated aluminum oxide samples were studied. A broad PL emission with a peak at ∼ 465 nm and a pair of strong and sharp emissions with peaks at 679 and 695 nm were observed in γ-rayed samples. The PL intensity was observed to increase with increase in γ-ray dose. Two prominent and well resolved TSL glows with peaks at 210°C and 365°C were observed in all γ-irradiated Al2O3 samples. The TSL intensity was also found to increase with increase in γ-ray dose. The TSL glow curves indicated second order kinetics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Bos A J J 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B184 310.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0 ↗
2. Chithambo M L, Sendezera E J and Davidson A T 2002 Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 100 26910.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a005864 ↗
3. Horowitz Y S, Avila O and Rodriguez-Villafuerte M 2001 Nucl. Instrum. & Meth. B184 8510.1016/S0168-583X(01)00710-8 ↗
4. Kingsley J J and Patil K C 1988 Mater. Lett. 6 42710.1016/0167-577X(88)90045-6 ↗
5. Kinsman K M, McKittrick J, Sluzky E and Hesse K 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 286610.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04516.x ↗
6. Kortov V S, Nikiforov S V, Milman I I and Moinseykin E V 2004 Radiat. Meas. 38 45110.1016/j.radmeas.2004.01.004 ↗
7. McKeever S W S, Akselrod M S, Colyott L E, Agersnap Larsen N, Polf J C and Whitley V 1999 Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 84 16310.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032709 ↗
8. Mimani T and Patil K C 2001 Mater. Phys. Mech. 4 134
9. Nagabhushana K R, Lakshminarasappa B N, Chandrappa G T, Haranath D and Fouran Singh 2007 Radiat. Eff. & Defect. Sol. 162 32510.1080/10420150601148699 ↗
10. Nagabhushana K R, Lakshminarasappa B N and Fouran Singh 2008 Radiat. Meas. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.04.035 (in press)10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.04.035 ↗
11. Rao C N R 1993 Mater. Sci. and Eng. B18 110.1016/0921-5107(93)90109-Z ↗
12. Rieke J K and Daniels F 1957 J. Phys. Chem. 51 62910.1021/j150551a026 ↗
13. Summers G P 1984 Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 8 6910.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a083043 ↗
14. Toyoda Taro, Obikawa Takashi and Shigenari Takeshi 1998 Mater. Sci. & Eng. B54 33
15. Veitch C D 1991 J. Mater. Sci. 26 652710.1007/BF02387841 ↗
16. Yukihara E G, Gaza R, McKeever S W S and Soares C G 2004 Radiat. Meas. 38 5910.1016/S1350-4487(03)00251-8 ↗
17. Zhang C X, Tang Q, Lin L B and Luo D L 2006 Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 119 40210.1093/rpd/nci579 ↗
18. Zhang Y and Stangle G C 1994 J. Mater. Res. 9 199710.1557/JMR.1994.1997 ↗