Polystyrene as a zwitter resist in electron beam lithography based electroless patterning of gold
Source abstract
Abstract
The resist action of polystyrene (Mw, 2,600,000) towards electroless deposition of gold on Si(100) surface following cross-linking by exposing to a 10 kV electron beam, has been investigated employing a scanning electron microscope equipped with electron beam lithography tool. With a low dose of electrons (21 μC/cm2), the exposed regions inhibited the metal deposition from the plating solution due to cross-linking—typical of the negative resist behaviour of polystyrene, with metal depositing only on the developed Si surface. Upon increased electron dosage (160 μC/cm2), however, Au deposition took place even in the exposed regions of the resist, thus turning it into a positive resist. Raman measurement revealed amorphous carbon present in the exposed region that promotes metal deposition. Further increase in dosage led successively to negative (220 μC/cm2) and positive (13,500 μC/cm2) resist states. The zwitter action of polystyrene resist has been exploited to create line gratings with pitch as low as 200 nm and gap electrodes down to 80 nm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Austin M D, Zhang W, Ge H X, Wasserman D, Lyon S A and Chou S Y 2005 Nanotechnology 16 105810.1088/0957-4484/16/8/010 ↗
2. Bernstein G H, Hill D A and Liu W 1992 J. Appl. Phys. 71 406610.1063/1.350831 ↗
3. Biebuyck H A, Larsen N B, Delamarche E and Michel B 1997 IBM Res. Develop. 41 1Y9710.1147/rd.411.0159 ↗
4. Bhuvana T, Kumar G V P, Narayana C and Kulkarni G U 2007 Nanotechnology 18 14570210.1088/0957-4484/18/14/145702 ↗
5. Chen J-K, Ko F-H and Chang F-C 2005 Adv. Funct. Mater. 15 114710.1002/adfm.200400077 ↗
6. Choi C H and Kertesz M 1997 J. Phys. Chem. A101 382310.1021/jp970620v ↗
7. Chuang C-M, Wu M-C, Huang Y-C, Cheng K-C, Lin C-F, Chen Y-F and Su W-F 2006 Nanotechnology 17 439910.1088/0957-4484/17/17/019 ↗
8. Ferrari A C and Robertson J 2000 Phys. Rev. B61 1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
9. Geis M W, Randall J N, Mountain R W, Woodhouse J D, Bromley E I, Astolfi D K and Economou N P 1985 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B3 34310.1116/1.583260 ↗
10. Hoole A C F, Welland M E and Broers A N 1997 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12 116610.1088/0268-1242/12/9/017 ↗
11. Imamura S, Tamamura T, Harada K and Sugawara S 1982 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 27 93710.1002/app.1982.070270313 ↗
12. Khoury M and Ferry D K 1996 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B14 7510.1116/1.588437 ↗
13. Russell M T, Pingree L S C, Hersam M C and Marks T J 2006 Langmuir 22 671210.1021/la060319i ↗
14. Seki S, Kanzaki K, Yoshida Y and Tagawa S 1997 Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 36 536110.1143/JJAP.36.5361 ↗
15. Tada T and Kanayama T 2000 Microelectronic Engineering 53 42510.1016/S0167-9317(00)00348-8 ↗
16. Thompson L F, Willson C G and Bowden M J 1994 Introduction to microlithography (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society) 2nd ed.
17. Tseng A A, Chen K, Chen C D and Ma K J 2003 IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packing Manufacturing 26 14110.1109/TEPM.2003.817714 ↗
18. Xia Y, Rogers J A, Paul K E and Whitesides G M 1999 Chem. Rev. 99 182310.1021/cr980002q ↗
19. Zailer I, Frost J E F, Chabasseur-Molyneux V, Ford C J B and Pepper M 1996 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 11 123510.1088/0268-1242/11/8/021 ↗