journal article·2005-12

Effect of temperature and α-irradiation on gas permeability for polymeric membrane

Vaibhav Kulshrestha, K. Awasthi, N. K. Acharya, M. Singh, Y. K. Vijay

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 28· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

In the present study the polyethersulphone (PES) membranes of thickness (35 ± 2) µm were pre- pared by solution cast method. The permeability of these membranes was calculated by varying the temper a- ture and by irradiation of α ions. For the variation of tem perature, the gas permeation cell was dipped in a constant temperature water bath in the temperature range from 303-373 K, which is well below the glass transition temperature (498 K). The permeability of H 2 and CO2 increased with increasing temperature. The PES membrane was exposed by α-source (95Am 241 ) of strength (1 µ Ci) in vacuum of the order of 10 -6 torr, with fluence 2· ·7 × 10 7 ions/cm 2 . The permeability of H 2 and CO2 has been observed for irradiated membrane with increasing etching time. The permeability increases with increasing etching time for both gases. There was a sudden change in permeability for both the gases when observed at 18 min etching. At this stage the tracks are visible with optical instrument, which confirms that the pores are genera ted. Most of pores seen in the micrograph are circular cross-section ones.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Membrane Separation Technologies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Acharya N K, Yadav P K, Wate S, Vijay Y K, Singh F and Avasthi D K 2004aBull. Mater. Sci. 27 41710.1007/BF02708557 ↗
2. Acharya N K, Yadav P K and Vijay Y K 2004bIndian J. Pure & Appl. Phys. 42 179
3. Apel P2003Nucl. Instrum. & Meth. Phys. Res. B208 1110.1016/S0168-583X(03)00634-7 ↗
4. Avasthi D K, Singh J P, Biswas A and Bose S K 1998Nucl. Instrum. & Meth. Phys. Res. B146 50410.1016/S0168-583X(98)00464-9 ↗
5. Barbari T A and Koros W J 1998J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 26 70910.1002/polb.1988.090260401 ↗
6. Costello L M and Koros W J 1994J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 32 70110.1002/polb.1994.090320412 ↗
7. Fleischer R L, Price P B and Walker RM 1975Nuclear tracks in solids: Principles and applications (Berkeley: University of California Press)10.1525/9780520320239 ↗
8. Ghosal K and Freeman B D 1993Polym. Adv. Technol. 5 67310.1002/pat.1994.220051102 ↗
9. Liu Ye, Wang Rong and Chung Tai-Shung 2001J. Membrane Sci. 189 23110.1016/S0376-7388(01)00415-X ↗
10. Pesiri D R, Jorgensen B and Dye R C 2003J. Membrane Sci. 218 1110.1016/S0376-7388(03)00129-7 ↗
11. Stern S A 1994J. Membrane Sci. 94 110.1016/0376-7388(94)00141-3 ↗
12. Vijay Y K 2003Radiat. Meas. 36 5710.1016/S1350-4487(03)00097-0 ↗
13. Vijay Y K, Wate S, Acharya N K and Garg J C 2002Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 90510.1016/S0360-3199(01)00188-4 ↗
14. Vijay Y K, Acharya N K, Wate S and Avasthi D K 2003Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 28 101510.1016/S0360-3199(02)00166-0 ↗