journal article·2002-02

Surface modification on PMMA : PVDF polyblend: hardening under chemical environment

R. Bajpai, V. Mishra, Pragyesh Agrawal, S. C. Datt

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 25· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The influence of chemical environment on polymers include the surface alteration as well as other deep modifications in surface layers. The surface hardening, as an effect of organic liquids on poly(methyl methacrylate): poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PMMA: PVDF), which is one of the few known miscible blends, has been detected using microhardness testing. Organic liquids like acetone, toluene, xylene and benzene were introduced on the surface of blend specimens for different durations. Vickers microhardness (H v) was measured for treated and untreated specimens. The study reveals both hardening and plasticization of specimens at different exposure times. The degree of surface hardening is maximum under acetone treatment. All the specimens exhibit surface hardening at an exposure time of 1 h with all the four liquids. This feature is prominent with longer exposures for specimens with increasing content of PVDF. However, the degree of hardening decreases with the time of exposure in the respective environments. In general, acetone and toluene impart surface hardening, whereas, xylene and benzene soften the specimen. PMMA: PVDF (83 : 17) blend exhibits surface hardening under all the four treatments when compared with the respective untreated specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Ajroldi 1997Chim. Ind. (Milan) 79 483
2. Bajpai R, Mishra V and Datt S C 1992Polym. Test. 11 38710.1016/0142-9418(92)90006-W ↗
3. Elias H G 1984Macromolecules, synthesis, materials and technology (New York: Plenum Press)Vol. 2, p. 1150
4. Gonzalez A, Martin G J, de Saja J A and Rodriguez R 1986J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 31 71710.1002/app.1986.070310235 ↗
5. Kojima M and Satake H 1984J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 22 28510.1002/pol.1984.180220213 ↗
6. Krupenya E N, Kagan A Yu and Simonov-Emel Yanov I D 1988Int. Polym. Sci. Technol. 15 T/57
7. Krupenya E N, Kagan A Yu, Simonov-Emel Yanov I D, Kuleznez V N and Mukhina L L 1989Int. Polym. Sci. Technol. 16 T/55
8. Lashkov G L, Veniaminov A V and Ratner O B 1986Polym. Sci., URSS 28 143
9. Maccone P, Brinatli G and Arcella V 2000Polym. Eng. & Sci. 40 76110.1002/pen.11205 ↗
10. Mishra V, Bajpai R and Datt S C 1994Polym. Test. 13 43510.1016/0142-9418(94)90052-3 ↗
11. Nishi T and Wang T T 1975Macromolecules 8 90910.1021/ma60048a040 ↗
12. Omar M K, Atkins A G and Lancaster J K 1986J. Mater. Sci. 21 252810.1007/BF01114302 ↗
13. Pandey S, Bajpai R and Datt S C 1990Polym. Test. 10 11110.1016/0142-9418(91)90005-I ↗
14. Paul D R and Altamirano J O 1975Adv. Chem. Ser. 142 35410.1021/ba-1975-0142.ch031 ↗
15. Tager A 1978Physical chemistry of polymers (Moscow: Mir Publishers) p. 558
16. Wu J C B and Brown N J 1986J. Mater. Sci. 21 1311