Investigation of the structural and acoustic properties of biodegradable nonwovens from chicken feathers that are environmental waste
Source abstract
Abstract
Producing multi-layer soundproofing materials by combining materials with different properties is a widely used method. The production of these types of structures utilizes the superior properties of each layer contained within the structure. This study addresses the acoustic performance of nonwoven surface structures fabricated in different thicknesses and densities using chicken feather fibres in different constructions. An impedance tube was used to determine the sound absorption and sound transmission loss values of two-layer structures of different densities and thicknesses. The results show that the influence of the layer in front or behind on the values of sound transmission losses is very limited in two-layer structures with varying densities and thicknesses. However, for the degree of sound absorption, it is important which layer is closer to the sound source. These findings are based on an analysis of multifactorial experimental data. Accordingly, the sound absorption coefficients and sound transmission loss values of all two-layer structures decrease slightly with increasing sound frequency in the frequency range of 63–200 Hz and then increase. The low-density layer on the front of the combined structure ensures better sound absorption at low and medium frequencies. As the density of the front layer increases, its ability to absorb sound decreases. It has been found that the sound absorption capacity of structures with a low density on the front and a thick layer on the back is highest.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Cobo P and Montero De Espinosa F 2013 Appl. Acoust. 74 106910.1016/j.apacoust.2013.03.003 ↗
2. Sakamoto S, Takauchi Y, Yanagimoto K and Watanabe S 2009 JSME 75 76010.1299/kikaic.75.760 ↗
3. Ehsan Samaei S, Berardi U, Taban E, Soltani P and Mohammad Mousavi S 2021 Appl. Acoust. 181 10815710.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108157 ↗
4. Sharma A, Datta S, Sanjana R K, Pooja B M, Bose S and Hegde G 2025 RSC Adv. 15 778610.1039/D5RA00025D ↗
5. Wang Y, Zhang C, Ren L, Ichchou M, Galland M A and Bareille O 2013 Poly. Comp. 34 184710.1002/pc.22590 ↗
6. Bansod P V, Mittal T and Mohanty A R 2016 Acoust. Aust. 44 45710.1007/s40857-016-0073-4 ↗
7. Sambu M, Yahya M N, Latif H A, Hatta M N M and Ghazali M I 2016 J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 11 2467
8. Tholkappiyan E, Saravanan D, Jagasthitha R, Angeswari T and Surya V T 2016 J. Ind. Text. 45 135010.1177/1528083714559569 ↗
9. Santoni A, Bonfiglio P, Fausti P, Marescotti C, Mazzanti V and Mollica F 2019 Appl. Acoust. 150 27910.1016/j.apacoust.2019.02.022 ↗
10. Carvalho S T M, Mendesa L M, Da Silva Cesar A A, Flórez J B and Mori F A 2015 Mater. Res. 18 82110.1590/1516-1439.010515 ↗
11. Molahalli V, Bhat V S, Sharma A, Soman G and Hegde G 2025 RSC Adv. 15 1418310.1039/D5RA02129D ↗
12. Erol M 2019 PhD thesis (Kayseri: Erciyes University)
13. Canpolat İ 2013 MSc thesis (Istanbul: Istanbul Technıcal Unıversıty)
14. Alonso R S, Sanches R, Paulo J and Marcicano P 2013 IJTFT 3 29
15. Hong C K and Wool R F 2005 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 95 152410.1002/app.21044 ↗
16. Chinta S, Landage S and Yadav K 2013 IJIRSET 2 1158
17. Renke Dullaart and Joao Mousques (eds) 2012 in: Keratin: structure, properties and applications (New York: Nova Science Publishers), p 142
18. Kocatepe S 2019 PhD thesis (Kayseri: Erciyes University)
19. Küçük M and Korkmaz Y 2012 Text. Res. J. 82 204310.1177/0040517512441987 ↗
20. Tascan M and Vaughn E A 2008 Text. Res. J. 78 28910.1177/0040517507084283 ↗
21. Paşayev N, Kocatepe S and Maraş N 2019 J. Ind. Text. 48 161610.1177/1528083718766843 ↗
22. Davern W A 1977 Appl. Acoust. 10 8510.1016/0003-682X(77)90019-6 ↗
23. Cox T J and D’Antonio P 2005 Build. Acoust. 12 29310.1260/135101005775219076 ↗
24. Padhye R and Nayak R 2016 (eds) Principles of sound absorbers (Singapore: Springer), p 4310.1007/978-981-10-1476-5_3 ↗
25. Alton Everest F and Pohlmann K C 2009 (eds) Master handbook of acoustics 5th edition (New York: The Mc Graw-Hill Companies)
26. Shoshani Y and Yakubov Y 2001 Int. Nonw. J. 10 23
27. Liu X J, Liu J L, Xu B J and Gao W D 2012 J. Vibrat. Shock 31 106
28. Lee Y and Joo C 2003 Autex. Res. J. 3 7810.1515/aut-2003-030205 ↗
29. Patinha S, Fangueiro R, Cunha F, Rana S and Prego F 2014 16th ECCM p 8
30. Liu X, Liu J and Su X A 2015 Text. Res. J. 85 155310.1177/0040517512474368 ↗
31. Dunn I P and Davern W A 1986 Appl. Acoust. 19 32110.1016/0003-682X(86)90044-7 ↗
32. Paşayev N, Tekoğlu O, Kocatepe S, Erol M and Maraş N 2021 J. Text. Eng. 28 12410.7216/1300759920212812401 ↗