Effect of fuel type on pseudocapacitance behaviour of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by solution combustion method
Source abstract
Abstract
The copper oxide nanoparticles are obtained, via one-step, rapid, eco-friendly solution combustion synthesis using glycine and urea as fuel, to investigate the influence of fuel type on electrochemical behaviour. The structural characteristics are performed using X-ray diffraction method. The cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge/discharge, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cycle stability tests are carried out in 6 M KOH electrolyte using a three-electrode system at room temperature. The electrochemical results show that the CuO synthesized using glycine (CuO–G) exhibits superior performance as an electrode in supercapacitor applications. The specific capacitance (16.72 F g−1) of the CuO–G electrode is higher than that (0.68 F g−1) of CuO synthesized using urea (CuO–U) electrode at a current density of 0.1 A g−1. Moreover, CuO–G electrode exhibits higher energy and power density of 0.41 Wh kg−1 and 143.5 W kg−1 compared to CuO–U electrode of 0.04 Wh kg−1 and 141.05 W kg−1, respectively. The results demonstrate that the CuO–G nanoparticles possess better electrochemical properties than CuO–U nanoparticles.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Vijayakumar S, Lee S H and Ryu K S 2015 Electrochim. Acta 182 97610.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.021 ↗
2. Guan L, Yu L and Chen G Z 2016 Electrochim. Acta 206 46410.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.213 ↗
3. González A, Goikolea E, Barrena J A and Mysyk R 2016 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 58 118910.1016/j.rser.2015.12.249 ↗
4. Suresh R, Tamilarasan K and Vadivu D S 2016 J. Ovonic. Res. 12 215
5. Zhou L, Li C, Liu X, Zhu Y, Wu Y and Van Ree T 2018 in Y Wu (ed.) Metal oxides in energy technologies (Netherlands: Elsevier) p 16910.1016/B978-0-12-811167-3.00007-9 ↗
6. Bhujun B, Tan M T T and Shanmugam A S 2017 Results Phys. 7 34510.1016/j.rinp.2016.04.010 ↗
7. Meng T, Xu Q Q, Wang Z H, Li Y T, Gao Z M, Xing X Y et al 2015 Electrochim. Acta 180 10410.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.085 ↗
8. Pendashteh A, Rahmanifar M S, Kaner R B and Mousavi M F 2014 Chem. Comm. 50 197210.1039/c3cc48773c ↗
9. Sumanta Kumar Meher and Ranga Rao G 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 2554310.1021/jp209165v ↗
10. Lv G, Wu D and Fu R 2009 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 355 246110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.08.035 ↗
11. Parnianfar H, Masoudpanah S M, Alamolhoda S and Fathi H 2017 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 432 2410.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.084 ↗
12. Prabhakaran Thandapani and Hemalatha Jawaharlal 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 1411310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.025 ↗
13. Dubal D P, Gund G S, Lokhande C D and Holze R 2013 Mater. Res. Bull. 48 92310.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.081 ↗
14. Moosavifard S E, El-Kady M F, Rahmanifar M S, Kaner R B and Mousavi M F 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 485110.1021/am508816t ↗
15. Shinde S K, Dubal D P, Ghodake G S and Fulari V J 2015 RSC Adv. 5 444310.1039/C4RA11164H ↗
16. Mahalingam Umadevi and Jegatha Christy 2013 Spectrochim. Acta A 109 13310.1016/j.saa.2013.02.028 ↗
17. Christy A J, Nehru L C and Umadevi M 2013 Powder Technol. 235 78310.1016/j.powtec.2012.11.045 ↗
18. Anandakumar B S, Reddy M B M, Tharamani C N, Pasha M A and Chandrappa G T 2013 Chin. J. Catal. 34 70410.1016/S1872-2067(11)60503-2 ↗
19. Wang L, Li X, Hao L, Hong S, Robertson A W and Sun Z 2022 Chin. J. Catal. 43 104910.1016/S1872-2067(21)63947-5 ↗
20. Gulati U, Rajesh U C and Rawat D S 2016 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 1003910.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01376 ↗
21. Ketwong T, Halabaso E R, Nguyen T K A, Areeprasert C and Doong R 2022 J. Electroanal. Chem. 905 11597010.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115970 ↗
22. Zhan Y, Bai J, Guo F, Zhou H, Shu R, Yu Y et al 2021 J. Alloys Compd. 885 16101410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161014 ↗
23. Hussain I, Hussain T, Yang S, Chen Y, Zhou J, Ma X et al 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 413 1275710.1016/j.cej.2020.127570 ↗
24. Wei Wen and Jin-Ming Wu 2014 RSC Adv. 4 5809010.1039/C4RA10145F ↗
25. Alves A K, Bergmann C P and Berutti F A 2013 (eds) Novel synthesis and characterization of nanostructured materials (Heidelberg: Springer)
26. Dean J A 1998 in N A Lange (ed.) Lange's handbook of chemistry (New York: McGraw-Hill)
27. Rao G R, Mishra B G and Sahu H R 2004 Mater. Lett. 58 352310.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.082 ↗
28. Radpour M, Masoudpanah S M and Alamolhoda S 2017 Ceram. Int. 43 1475610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.216 ↗
29. Deng J, Kang L, Bai G, Li Y, Li P, Liu X et al 2014 Electrochim. Acta 132 12710.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.158 ↗
30. Wang Y, Lei Y, Li J, Gu L, Yuan H and Xiao D 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 673910.1021/am500464n ↗
31. Wang Q, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Jiang H, Hu T and Meng C 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 782 110310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.235 ↗
32. Murphin Kumar P S, Kyaw H H, Myint M T Z, Al-Haj L, Al-Muhtaseb AaH, Al-Abri M et al 2020 Int. J. Energy Res. 44 1068210.1002/er.5712 ↗
33. Lee J W, Ahn T, Kim J H, Ko J M and Kim J D 2011 Electrochim. Acta 56 484910.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.116 ↗
34. Randviir Edward P and Banks Craig E 2013 Anal. Methods 5 109810.1039/c3ay26476a ↗
35. Fu M, Chen W, Ding J, Zhu X and Liu Q 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 782 95210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.244 ↗
36. Shanmugavani Amirthalingam and Kalai Selvan Ramakrishnan 2016 Electrochim. Acta 188 85210.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.077 ↗