journal article·2021-12

Microstructural, optical and dielectric variations in SnO2 nanoparticles synthesized via surfactant-assisted sol–gel route

S Deepa, Aksa Mary Philip, Andrew Simon George, K Prasannakumari

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

SnO2 nanoparticles are synthesized via sol–gel method in the presence of two surfactants isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and lauryl alcohol (LA). The synthesized nanoparticles are characterized for the microstructural features by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and field-emission scanning electron micrograph. To resolve the presence of defect-related oxygen vacancies and trapped states, optical studies such as UV–visible absorbance and Raman spectra have been carried out. The charge transport in the material is analysed by studying the AC electrical conduction. The deposited tetragonal rutile-phased SnO2 nanoparticles are benefited by morphological modifications along with crystallite size reduction (from 21.5 to 15.1 nm) and an increase in dislocation density on changeover from LA to IPA in the precursor. Also, a preferential orientation of (112) plane is observed for the LA-assisted sample. The bandgap of the particles prepared via LA addition is found to be considerably larger (3.71 eV) than that of IPA-assisted sample (3.44 eV). A detailed study of Raman spectra elucidates the presence of defects. The AC conductivity analysis reveals that the mobility of charge carriers is higher in LA-assisted sample, which substantiates the findings from microstructural and optical studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang Y, Wang Y and Yin S 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 420 39910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.176 ↗
2. Zhao Q, Ma L, Zhang Q, Wang C and Xu X 2015 J. Nanomater. Article ID 850147 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/85014710.1155/2015/850147 ↗
3. Chen J S and Lou X W 2013 Small 11 187710.1002/smll.201202601 ↗
4. Pan J, Shen H and Mathur S 2012 J. Nanotechnol. Article ID 917320 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/91732010.1155/2012/917320 ↗
5. Suthakaran S, Dhanapandian S, Krishnakumar N and Ponpandian N 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 0850i310.1088/2053-1591/ab29c2 ↗
6. Balakrishnan K and Murugasean N 2021 Int. J. Nano Dimens. 12 76
7. Majumdar S and Devi P S 2010 AIP Conf. Proc. p 110.1063/1.3504298 ↗
8. Kumar P, Khadtare S, Park J and Yadav B C 2020 Mater. Lett. 278 12845110.1016/j.matlet.2020.128451 ↗
9. Bhagwat A D, Sawant S S, Ankamwar B G and Mahajan C M 2015 J. Nano Electron. Phys. 7 04037
10. Aziz M, Abbas S S and Baharom W R W 2013 Mater. Lett. 91 3110.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.079 ↗
11. Kumari K P, Thomas B, Deepa S and Benoy S 2018 J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 29 13087
12. Maestro A, Santini E, Zabiegaj D, Llamas S, Ravera F, Liggieri L et al 2015 Ad. Condens. Matter Phys. Article ID 917516 doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/91751610.1155/2015/917516 ↗
13. Patil G E, Kajale D D, Gaikwad V B and Jain G H 2012 Int. Nano Lett. 2 110.1186/2228-5326-2-17 ↗
14. Winchell A N and Winchell H 1964 The microscopical characters of artificial inorganic solid substances: optical properties of artificial minerals (Academic Press)
15. Suryanarayana C and Norton M G 2013 X-ray diffraction: a practical approach (Springer Science & Business Media)
16. Cullity B D 1957 Sci. Am. 196 10310.1038/scientificamerican0557-103 ↗
17. Bahadar K S, Faisal M, Rahman M M and Jamal A 2011 Sci. Total Environ. 409 298710.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.019 ↗
18. Devesa S, Rooney A P, Graça M P, Cooper D and Costa L C 2021 Mater. Sci. Eng.: B 263 11483010.1016/j.mseb.2020.114830 ↗
19. Nasser S A, Afify H H, El-Hakim S A and Zayed M K 1998 Thin Solid Films 315 32710.1016/S0040-6090(97)00757-8 ↗
20. Swarnkar R K, Singh S C and Gopal R 2011 Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 136310.1007/s12034-011-0329-4 ↗
21. Deepa S, Kumari K P and Thomas B 2017 Ceram. Int. 43 1712810.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.134 ↗
22. Zhou J X, Zhang M S, Hong J M and Yin Z 2006 Solid State Commun. 138 24210.1016/j.ssc.2006.03.007 ↗
23. Diéguez A, Romano-Rodríguez A, Vila A and Morante J R 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 155010.1063/1.1385573 ↗
24. Chen Y J, Nie L, Xue X Y, Wang Y G and Wang T H 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 08310510.1063/1.2166695 ↗
25. Thangadurai P, Chandra B A, Ramasamy S, Kesavamoorthy R and Ravindran T R 2005 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 66 162110.1016/j.jpcs.2005.05.079 ↗
26. Sahay P P, Mishra R K, Pandey S N, Jha S and Shamsuddin M 2012 Ceram. Int. 38 128110.1016/j.ceramint.2011.08.062 ↗
27. Bredar A R, Chown A L, Burton A R and Farnum B H 2020 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3 6610.1021/acsaem.9b01965 ↗
28. Kungumadevi L, Sathyamoorthy R and Subbarayan A 2010 Solid State Electron. 54 5810.1016/j.sse.2009.09.023 ↗
29. Ghosh M and Rao C N R 2004 Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 49310.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.092 ↗
30. Lanje A S, Sharma S J and Pode R B 2010 Arch. Phys. Res. 1 49
31. Aal A A 2006 Egypt J. Solids 29 30310.21608/ejs.2006.149278 ↗