journal article·2021-12

Electrochemical fabrication of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic coating: applications in corrosion-resistant surfaces and oil cleanup

G Heidari, S I Hosseini

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, one-step electrodeposition method was used to achieve a superhydrophobic and superoleophilic coating. Since the obtained coating was magnetic, superhydrophobic and superoleophilic, it was evaluated from the viewpoint of anti-corrosion and oil cleanup applications. The Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) results indicated that the superhydrophobic surface was composed of γ-Fe2O3 and Fe(CH3(CH2)12COO) compositions. The water and oil contact angles on the coating were as large as 160 and approximately 0°, respectively. Using the potentiodynamic polarization test, it was found that the corrosion rate of the superhydrophobic surface was reduced by more than five orders of magnitude than the bare carbon steel in NaCl solution. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results demonstrated that the total impedance of the superhydrophobic surface significantly increased when compared to the bare carbon steel. Moreover, a powder was obtained by detaching the coating from the surface. The resulting powder was superhydrophobic and superoleophilic and also had magnetic properties. The results showed that the polyurethane sponge modified by the obtained powder could separate oil from water.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Attar M R, Khajavian E, Hosseinpour S and Davoodi A 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 43 3110.1007/s12034-019-1998-7 ↗
2. Chatterjee S, Das P, Tripathy U, Singh B P and Besra L 2020 Bull. Mater. Sci. 43 13010.1007/s12034-020-02103-9 ↗
3. Chobaomsup V, Metzner M and Boonyongmaneerat Y 2020 J. Coat. Technol. Res. 17 58310.1007/s11998-020-00327-2 ↗
4. Aoki Y 2020 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 704 1010.1080/15421406.2020.1741795 ↗
5. Chen D, Kang Z and Li W 2019 Mater. Res. Express 7 01640410.1088/2053-1591/ab5bf3 ↗
6. Chen Z, Hao L, Chen A, Song Q and Chen C 2012 Electrochim. Acta 59 16810.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.045 ↗
7. Chen Z, Li F, Hao L, Chen A and Kong Y 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 139510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.086 ↗
8. Liu H, Su S, Xie J, Ma Y and Tao C 2020 J. Mater. Res. 35 292510.1557/jmr.2020.260 ↗
9. He J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Ma L, Zhao Y, Zhou Y et al 2020 J. Mater. Sci. 55 670810.1007/s10853-020-04462-4 ↗
10. Dominic J, Perumal G, Grewal H S and Arora H S 2020 Surf. Eng. 36 66010.1080/02670844.2020.1727687 ↗
11. Chen Z, Hao L, Duan M and Chen C 2013 Appl. Phys. A 111 58110.1007/s00339-012-7263-1 ↗
12. Tan J, Hao J, An Z and Liu C 2017 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 12 4010.20964/2017.01.15 ↗
13. Hao L-M, Xie Y, Zhang T and Chen Z 2016 J. Cent. South Univ. 23 157610.1007/s11771-016-3211-0 ↗
14. Gilroy D and Mayne J 1965 Corros. Sci. 5 5510.1016/S0010-938X(65)90096-X ↗
15. Ateş S, Baran Aydın E and Yazıcı B 2020 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 35 41910.1080/01694243.2020.1807240 ↗
16. Yin X, Mu P, Wang Q and Li J 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 3545310.1021/acsami.0c09497 ↗
17. Huang Y, Sarkar D K, Gallant D and Chen X G 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 282 68910.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.034 ↗
18. El Dessouky W I, Abbas R, Sadik W A, El Demerdash A G M and Hefnawy A 2017 Arab. J. Chem. 10 36810.1016/j.arabjc.2015.12.011 ↗
19. Liang L, Liu P, Su H, Qian H and Ma H 2020 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 137 4935310.1002/app.49353 ↗
20. Liu S, Xu Q, Latthe S S, Gurav A B and Xing R 2015 RSC Adv. 5 6829310.1039/C5RA12301A ↗