Tuning the electronic and optical properties of [26] annulene by electron donor and acceptor groups (push–pull system)
Source abstract
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating the effect of electron donor and acceptor groups on electrical and optical properties of pi-conjugated [26] annulene. The results of the study showed that almost all selected substitutions reduced the value of $$E_{\mathrm{g}}$$ compared with pristine annulene. Calculated dipole moments for the sandwiched forms of annulene are noticeably greater than those of its pristine form, of which the ED2–ANN–QB2 had the maximum value for dipole moment. It was found that the influence of electron donor and acceptor groups on annulene optical properties is very significant. More optical activity improvement was seen in the case of using QB2 and QB3 in one side and other electron donor groups in opposite side of [26] annulene molecule. The higher optical activity of these sandwiched molecules corresponds to higher electron transfer in them. The results of this research may be useful in designing new photosensitizers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Adamson A W, Kalyanasundaram K and Grätzel M 1993 Photosensitization and photocatalysis using inorganic and organometallic compounds (Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media B.V.)
2. Zhang P, Wang M, Li C, Li X, Dong J and Sun L 2010 Chem. Commun. 46 880610.1039/c0cc03154b ↗
3. Pfeffer M G, Kowacs T, Wächtler M, Guthmuller J, Dietzek B, Vos J G et al 2015 Angew. Chem. 54 662710.1002/anie.201409442 ↗
4. Ravve A 2006 Light-associated reactions of synthetic polymers (New York, NY: Springer)
5. Wu W, Mao D, Xu S, Kenry, Hu F, Li X et al 2018 Chem 4 193710.1016/j.chempr.2018.06.003 ↗
6. Whitehead K and Hedges J I 2005 J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 80 11510.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.03.008 ↗
7. Koh P W, Hatta M H M, Ong S T, Yuliati L and Lee S L 2017 J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 332 21510.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.08.027 ↗
8. Rühle S, Shalom M and Zaban A 2010 ChemPhysChem 11 229010.1002/cphc.201000069 ↗
9. Huizhi Z, Wu L, Gao Y and Ma T 2011 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 219 18810.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.02.008 ↗
10. Yamazaki E, Murayama M, Nishikawa N, Hashimoto N, Shoyama M and Kurita O 2007 J. Sol. Energy 81 51210.1016/j.solener.2006.08.003 ↗
11. Boyo A O, Shitta M B O, Oluwa T and Adeola S 2012 Trends Appl. Sci. Res. 7 55810.3923/tasr.2012.558.564 ↗
12. Yogo T, Urano Y, Ishitsuka Y, Maniwa F and Nagano T 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 1216210.1021/ja0528533 ↗
13. Lissi E A, Encinas M V, Lemp E and Rubio M A 1993 Chem. Rev. 93 69910.1021/cr00018a004 ↗
14. Kou J, Dou D and Yang L 2017 Oncotarget 8 8159110.18632/oncotarget.20189 ↗
15. Abrahamse H and Hamblin M R 2016 Biochem. J. 473 34710.1042/BJ20150942 ↗
16. Ekrami S and Shamlouei H R 2018 Chem. Phys. Lett. 709 2610.1016/j.cplett.2018.08.035 ↗
17. Becke A D 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
18. Lee C, Yang W and Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
19. Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R et al 2009 GAUSSIAN 09 (Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc.)
20. O’boyle N M, Tenderholt A L and Langner K M 2008 J.Comput. Chem.29 83910.1002/jcc.20823 ↗
21. Runge E and Gross E K 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett.52 99710.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 ↗
22. Gross E and Kohn W 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett.55 285010.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2850 ↗
23. Casida M E, Jamorski C, Casida K C and Salahub D R 1998 J. Phys. Chem.108 443910.1063/1.475855 ↗