journal article·2019-06

Effect of electrolytes on photoelectrochemical performance of a CuS–CdS heterojunction

A S Jadhav, V M Bhuse

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

CdS–CuS heterojunction films have been grown successfully on a copper substrate using a chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. The obtained films are characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), optical absorption, Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence (PL) analysis and the photo-electrochemical (PEC) properties of the CdS–CuS heterojunction have been studied using different electrolytes. The XRD pattern of CuS–CdS shows peaks corresponding to CuS (hexagonal) and CdS (cubic) structures, while the optical absorption studies revealed the presence of an absorption edge corresponding to CuS–CdS (band gap of 1.85 eV). The Raman spectra of the CuS, CdS and CuS–CdS heterojunctions were recorded and are in good agreement with the results reported in the literature. TEM and cross-sectional SEM images show an overlap between CuS rods and CdS flasks. The charge transfer across the layers was studied by using PL spectra. The measurement of the photo-electrochemical properties using a conventional two electrode system for an iodine electrolyte showed the highest conversion efficiency of 1.40% as against for potassium ferro–ferricyanide (0.38%) and polysulphide electrolytes (0.02%).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdu Y and Musa A O 2009 Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci. Goabal. 2 8
2. Wang Y J, Wilkinson D P and Zhang J J 2011 Chem. Rev. 111 762510.1021/cr100060r ↗
3. Deb S K 2005 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 88 110.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.007 ↗
4. Han G, Zhang S, Boix P P, Wong L H, Sun L and Lien S Y Pro. Mater Sci. 87 24610.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.003 ↗
5. Taur V S, Joshi R A, Ghule A V and Sharma R 2012 Renew. Energy 38 21910.1016/j.renene.2011.07.024 ↗
6. Acosta D R, Magana C R, Martinez A I and Maldonado A 2004 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 82 1110.1016/j.solmat.2004.01.001 ↗
7. Kazmerski L L, White F R, Ayyagari M S, Juang Y J and Patterson R P 1977 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14 6510.1116/1.569173 ↗
8. Alexander J N, Higashiya S, Caskey D, Efstathiadis H and Haldar P 2014 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 125 4710.1016/j.solmat.2014.02.017 ↗
9. Diniz A S A C 2011 Renew. Energy 36 115310.1016/j.renene.2010.09.005 ↗
10. Sam M, Bayati M R, Mojtahedi M and Janghorban K 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 144910.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.066 ↗
11. Macdonald D D and Sharifi-Asl S 2011 Is copper immune to corrosion when in contact with water and aqueous solutions? (Swedish Radiation Safety Authority)
12. Beberwyck B J, Surendranah Y and Alivisatos A P 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 1975910.1021/jp405989z ↗
13. Deka S, Miszta K, Dorfs D, Genovese A, Bertoni G and Manna L 2010 Nano Lett. 10 377010.1021/nl102539a ↗
14. Thambidurai M, Muthukumarasamy N, Velauthapillai D and Lee C 2013 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 24 453510.1007/s10854-013-1438-1 ↗
15. Hurmaa T and Kose S 2016 Optik 127 600010.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.019 ↗
16. Xu C Y, Zhang P X and Yan L 2001 J. Raman Spectrosc. 32 86210.1002/jrs.773 ↗
17. Kumar P, Saxena N, Chandra R, Gupta V, Agarwal A and Kanjilal D 2012 Nanoscale Res Lett. 7 58410.1186/1556-276X-7-584 ↗
18. Chen Y, Qin Z, Wang X, Guo X and Guo L 2015 RSC Adv. 5 1815910.1039/C5RA00091B ↗
19. Peng B, Yu G, Liu X, Liu B, Liang X, Bi L et al 2016 2D Mater., https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/02502010.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025020 ↗