journal article·2012-12

Effect of surface modification and hybridization on dynamic mechanical properties of Roystonea regia/glass–epoxy composites

Govardhan Goud, R N Rao

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The paper evaluates effect of fibre surface modification and hybridization on dynamic mechanical properties of Roystonea regia/epoxy composites. Surface modification involved alkali and silane treatments. Alkali treatment proved to be more effective on dynamic mechanical properties as compared to silane treatment. Storage and loss modulus values increased after treatments with simultaneous decrease in tan δ values. Roystonea regia and glass fibres were used together with varying proportions as reinforcement in epoxy matrix to study the hybridization effect on dynamic mechanical properties. Storage and loss modulus values increased with increase in glass fibre content whereas tan δ values were found to decrease. Scanning electron microscopy of tensile fractured surfaces was carried out to study the interface adhesion of different composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Bisanda E T N and Ansell M P 1991 Compos. Sci. Technol. 41 16510.1016/0266-3538(91)90026-L ↗
2. Bledzki A K and Gassan J 1999 Prog. Polym. Sci. 24 22110.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
3. Huda Masud S, Drzal Lawrence T, Mohanty Amar K and Misra Manjusri 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 42410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.022 ↗
4. Jacob Maya, Francis Bejoy, Thomas Sabu and Varughese K T 2006 Polym. Compos. 27 67110.1002/pc.20250 ↗
5. Kuzak S G and Shanmugam Arun 1999 J. Polym. Sci. 73 649
6. Li Yan, Mai Yiu-Wing and Ye Lin 2000 Compos. Sci. Technol. 60 203710.1016/S0266-3538(00)00101-9 ↗
7. Manikandan K C, Nair S M D and Thomas S 1996 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 60 148310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960531)60:9<1483::AID-APP23>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
8. Pickering K L, Beckermann G W, Alam S N and Foreman N J 2007 Compos. Part A 38 46110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.020 ↗
9. Pothan L A, Thomas S and Neelakantan N R 1997 J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 16 74410.1177/073168449701600806 ↗
10. Raghavendra Rao H, Varada Rajulu A, Ramachandra Reddy and Hemachandra Reddy K 2010 J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 29 144610.1177/0731684409105077 ↗
11. Rong Min Zhi, Zhang Ming Qiu, Liu Yuan, Yang Gui Cheng and Zeng Han Min 2001 Compos. Sci. Technol. 61 143710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X ↗
12. Rout J, Misra M, Thripathy S S, Nayak S K and Mohanty A K 2001 Compos. Sci. Technol. 61 130310.1016/S0266-3538(01)00021-5 ↗
13. Sinha E and Rout S K 2009 Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 6510.1007/s12034-009-0010-3 ↗
14. Srikala M S, George Jayamol, Kumaran M G and Thomas Sabu 2002 Compos. Sci. Technol. 62 33910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00219-6 ↗