Applicability of four parameter formalisms in interpreting thermodynamic properties of binary systems
Source abstract
Abstract
The four parameter functions are generally considered to be adequate for representation of the thermodynamic properties for the strongly interacting binary systems. The present study involves a critical comparison in terms of applicability of the three well known four-parameter formalisms for the representation of the thermodynamic properties of binary systems. The study indicates that the derived values of the infinite dilution parameters based on the formalisms compare favourably with the computed data available in the literature. The standard deviations in terms of the partial and integral excess functions of all the models lie well within the experimental scatter of the computed data and coincide exactly with each other. The formalisms are useful in representation of the thermodynamic properties of most of the binary systems except for the Mg–Bi and Mg–In systems. In such systems, it appears that the additional compositional terms may be necessary for the formalisms for adequate description of behaviour of the systems. Since the derived values of the thermodynamic properties of all the formalisms match favourably over the entire compositional range for the systems as studied in the present research, any one of them may be used for adequate representation of the properties of the systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Darken L S 1968 Trans. TMS-AIME 242 1997
2. Divakar M and Hajra J P 2001 Metall. Mater. Trans. B32 423
3. Dutkiewicz J and Zakulski W 1984 Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 5 28410.1007/BF02868554 ↗
4. Hajra J P 1980 Met. Trans. B11 21510.1007/BF02668404 ↗
5. Hajra J P and Mazumdar B 1991 Met. Trans. B22 59310.1007/BF02679014 ↗
6. Hajra J P and Divakar M 1999 Metall. Mater. Trans. B30 42910.1007/s11663-999-0075-9 ↗
7. Hajra J P, Aldinger F and Seifert H J 2003a Steel Grips 11 353
8. Hajra J P, Aldinger F and Seifert H J 2003b Steel Grips 1 433
9. Hardy H K 1953 Acta Metall. 1 20210.1016/0001-6160(53)90059-5 ↗
10. Hilderbrand J H 1929 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51 6610.1021/ja01376a009 ↗
11. Hultgren R, Desai P, Hawkins D, Gliser M and Kelley K 1973 Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys (Metals Park, OH: ASM)
12. Krupkowski A 1950 Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett. Ser. A 1 15
13. Lupis C H P and Elliott J F 1966 Acta Metall. 14 52910.1016/0001-6160(66)90320-8 ↗
14. Moser Z, Dutkiewicz J, Gasior W and Salawa J 1985 Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 6 33010.1007/BF02880511 ↗
15. Pelton A D and Bale C W 1986 Met. Trans. A17 105710.1007/BF02661272 ↗
16. Redlich O and Kister A 1948 Ind. Eng. Chem. 40 34510.1021/ie50458a036 ↗
17. Wagner C 1962 Thermodynamics of alloys (Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley)