journal article·2008-12

Effect of increased manganese addition and mould type on the slurry erosion characteristics of Cr-Mn iron systems

P. Sampathkumaran, C. Ranganathaiah, S. Seetharamu, Kishore

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 31· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The wear resistance of high chromium iron is well recorded. However, the same is not the case as regards the use of manganese at higher percentages in high chromium irons and its influence on wear behaviour. Hence, this work highlights the slurry wear characteristics of chromium (□ 16–19%) iron following the introduction of manganese at two levels i.e. 5 and 10%. It is known that the wear properties are dictated by the microstructural features. To alter the structure, the cooling rate of casting has been varied by adopting two different types of moulds (i.e. sand and metal) and subsequently subjecting to thermal treatment. The as-cast and heat treated samples are examined for microstructure and then evaluated for hardness and slurry erosion properties. As the manganese content is increased from 5 to 10%, the hardness showed a decrease in value both in the as-cast and heat treated conditions. The slurry erosion loss, expectedly, showed an increase irrespective of the sample condition (i.e. mould type/heat treatment adopted). The findings are corroborated with the microstructural features obtained through optical and scanning electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Erosion and Abrasive Machining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 1984 G65-94, Section 3, 03-02 ASTM, Philadelphia, 239
2. Basak A, Pening J and Dellewyns J 1981 AFS Int. Cast Metal J. 12
3. Gundlach R B 1988 High alloy white irons, ASM metals handbook, castings (Metals Park, Ohio: ASM International) 15 p. 678
4. Gundlach Richard B and Doane Douglas V 1997 Alloy cast irons, ASM metals handbook, 1 (Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International) p. 85
5. Hebbar B M and Seshan S 1989 Wear resistant casting for thermal power plants, National workshop on wear and erosion of materials in thermal power stations (Bangalore: CPRI) 3A1
6. Jiang Ye-hua, Li Zu-Lai, Qi Ting and Zhou Rong 2006 Zhuzao Jishu Foundry Technol. 27 333
7. Junyi S and Yuding J 1987 International conference on wear of materials (New York: ASME) p. 661
8. Kim Chang Kyu, Lee Sunghak and Jung Jae-Young 2006 Metall. & Mater. Trans. A37 63310.1007/s11661-006-0035-9 ↗
9. Laird II G 1993 AFS Trans. 128 487
10. Maratray F 1981 AFS Int. Cast Metal J. 55
11. Nishigaki K 2004 Eng. Mater. 52 91
12. Nong Wan, Dong Jian-Xin and Xie Xi-Shan 2005 Zhuzao Jishu, Foundry Technol. 26 723
13. Norman T E, Solomon A and Doane D V 1977 AFS Trans. 77 242
14. Oh Hongsug, Lee Sunghak, Jung Jaeyoung and Ahn Sangho 2001 Metall. & Mater. Trans. A32 51510.1007/s11661-001-0068-z ↗
15. Patwardhan A K, Mehta M L and Sharma C P 1981 AFS Int. Cast Metal J. 3
16. Sampathkumaran P, Seetharamu S and Kishore 2005 Wear 259 7010.1016/j.wear.2005.03.001 ↗
17. Sapate S G and Rama Rao A V 2006 Tribology Int. 39 20610.1016/j.triboint.2004.10.013 ↗
18. Seetharamu S and Sampathkumaran P 1991 Wear and erosion of thermal power station components, CPRI Technical Report No. 219, Bangalore
19. Seetharamu S, Sampathkumaran P and Kumar R K 1995 Wear 267 15910.1016/0043-1648(95)07173-3 ↗
20. Tabrett C P, Sare I R and Ghomashchi M R 1996 Int. Mater. Rev. 41 5910.1179/imr.1996.41.2.59 ↗
21. Tekeli Suleman, Gurall Ahmed and Guru Metin 2007 Mater. Sci. Forum 534–536 629