journal article·2023-04-20

High-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated with electrospun PVdF-HFP polymer nanofibre-based gel electrolytes

M A K L Dissanayake, M S H Hettiarachchi, G K R Senadeera, J M K W Kumari, K Umair, T M W J Bandara, I Albinsson, M Furlani, B-E Mellander, N B Chaure, O I Olusola

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVdF-HFP) electrospun polymer nanofibre-based quasi-solid or gel electrolytes were successfully fabricated by incorporating a liquid electrolyte within the nanofibre membrane. The dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) fabricated with gel and with liquid electrolyte were characterized by photocurrent–voltage measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements. The maximum efficiency (η) of 6.79% was observed for the DSSC fabricated with optimized nanofibre membrane thickness, corresponding to 4 min of electrospinning time. The optimized PVdF-HFP nanofibre gel electrolyte shows an ionic conductivity of 7.16 × 10−3 S cm–1 at 25°C, while the corresponding liquid electrolyte exhibits an ionic conductivity of 11.69 × 10–3 S cm–1 at the same temperature. The open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current density (Jsc) and fill factor were recorded as 801.40 mV, 12.70 mA cm–2, and 66.67%, respectively, at an incident light intensity of 100 mW cm–2 with a 1.5 AM filter. The nanofibre gel electrolyte-based cell showed an efficiency of 6.79%, whereas the efficiency of the conventional liquid electrolyte-based cell was 7.28% under the same conditions. Furthermore, nanofibre gel electrolyte-based cells exhibited better stability, maintaining 85.40% of initial efficiency after 120 h. These results show that the optimized, polymer nanofibre-based gel electrolyte can be used successfully to replace the liquid electrolyte in DSSCs without much loss of efficiency but improving the stability while minimizing most of the drawbacks associated with liquid electrolytes.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Chigome S and Torto N 2011 Anal. Chim. Acta 706 2510.1016/j.aca.2011.08.021 ↗
2. Shi X, Zhou W, Ma D, Ma Q, Bridges D and Ma Y 2015 J. Nanomater. 16 122
3. Wang X and Hsiao B S 2016 Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 12 6210.1016/j.coche.2016.03.001 ↗
4. Huang Z M, Zhang Y, Kotaki M and Ramakrishna S 2003 Sci. Technol. 63 2223
5. Gong J, Sumathy K, Qiao Q and Zhou Z 2017 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68 23410.1016/j.rser.2016.09.097 ↗
6. O’Regan B and Grätzel M 1991 Nature 353 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
7. Park S H, Won D H, Choi H J, Hwang W P, Jang S I, Kim J H et al 2011 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95 29610.1016/j.solmat.2010.04.029 ↗
8. Priya A R S, Subramania A, Jung Y S and Kim K J 2008 Langmuir 24 981610.1021/la801375s ↗
9. Thomas M and Rajiv S 2019 New J. Chem. 43 444410.1039/C8NJ05505J ↗
10. Dissanayake M A K L, Divarathne H K D W M N R, Thotawatthage C A, Dissanayake C B, Senadeera G K R and Bandara B M R 2014 Electrochim. Acta 130 7610.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.122 ↗
11. Bandara T M W J, Weerasinghe A M J S, Dissanayake M A K L, Senadeera G K R, Furlani M, Albinsson I et al 2018 Electrochim. Acta 266 27610.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.025 ↗
12. Dissanayake M A K L, Umair K, Senadeera G K R and Kumari J M K W 2021 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 415 11330810.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113308 ↗
13. Cheng F, Ou Y, Liu G, Zhao L, Dong B, Wang S et al 2019 J. Nanomater. 9 78310.3390/nano9050783 ↗
14. Arof A K, Aziz M F, Noor M M, Careem M A, Bandara L R A K, Thotawatthage C A et al 2014 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 292910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.028 ↗
15. Dissanayake M A K L, Sarangika H N M, Senadeera G K R, Divarathne H K D W M N R and Ekanayake E M P C 2017 J. Appl. Electrochem. 47 123910.1007/s10800-017-1116-8 ↗
16. Lee J-K, Choi H-J, Park S-H, Won D-H, Park H-W, Kim J-H et al 2010 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 519 23410.1080/15421401003598231 ↗
17. Dissanayake S S, Dissanayake M A K L, Seneviratne V A, Senadeera G K R and Thotawatthage C A 2016 Mater. Today: Proc. 3 S104
18. Hamann T W, Jensen R A, Martinson A B F, Ryswyk H V and Hupp J T 2008 Energy Environ. Sci. 1 6610.1039/b809672d ↗
19. Chou H T, Hsu H C, Lien C H and Chen S T 2015 Microelectron. Reliab. 55 217410.1016/j.microrel.2015.09.015 ↗
20. Gao Z, Yang J, Cheng Q, Tian L, Jiang K and Yang L 2013 Mater. Chem. Phys. 137 86610.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.10.028 ↗
21. Tang X, Wang Y and Cao G 2013 J. Electroanal. Chem. 694 610.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.036 ↗
22. Khan A A, Kamarudin M A, Qasim M M and Wilkinson T D 2017 Electrochim. Acta 244 16210.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.033 ↗
23. Gnana G, Balanay M P, Nirmala R, Kim D H, Kumar T R, Senthilkumar N et al 2016 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16 58110.1166/jnn.2016.10677 ↗
24. Tripathi S K, Gupta A and Kumari M 2012 Bull. Mater. Sci. 35 96910.1007/s12034-012-0387-2 ↗
25. Liu W, Lee S W, Lin D, Shi F, Wang S, Sendek A D et al 2003 Nat. Energy 17035 1
26. Xue G, Guo Y, Yu T, Guan J, Yu X, Zhang J et al 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 149610.1016/S1452-3981(23)13430-4 ↗
27. Angaiah S, Murugadoss V, Arunachalam S, Panneerselvam P and Krishnan S 2018 Eng. Sci. 4 44
28. Thomas M and Rajiv S 2020 Electrochim. Acta 341 13604010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136040 ↗
29. Sahito I A, Ahmed F, Khatri Z, Sun K C and Jeong S H 2017 J. Mater. 52 1392010.1007/s10853-017-1473-z ↗