Photodegradation of methylene blue over a new down-shifting luminescence catalyst
Source abstract
Abstract
TiO $$2$$ nanotube arrays prepared by anodization technology are modified with a samarium ion (Sm $$3+)$$ by a hydrothermal method for use in photodegradation of methylene blue (MB). The samarium ion as a down-shifting luminescence material can improve UV radiation harvesting to increase visible light utilization. The efficiency of the photocatalytic activity for the modified-TiO $$2$$ nanotube arrays in degradation of MB was investigated under UV–Vis light irradiation. The results show that Sm–TiO $$2$$ nanotubes can increase the photocatalytic efficiency of MB. When TiO $$2$$ nanotubes are modified by 0.02 M Sm $$3+$$ , MB can be almost completely degraded when compared with bare TiO $$2$$ nanotubes. This indicates that TiO $$2$$ nanotubes structure, surface area and good UV radiation harvesting play important roles in the degradation of MB.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Grätzel M and O’Regan B 1991 Nature 353 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
2. Grätzel M 2001 Nature 414 33810.1038/35104607 ↗
3. Grätzel M 1995 Electrochim. Acta 40 64310.1016/0013-4686(95)90400-W ↗
4. Benkstein K D, Kopidakis N, Lagemaat J V D and Frank A J 2003 J. Phys. Chem. B 107 775910.1021/jp022681l ↗
5. Charoensirithavorn P, Ogomi Y, Sagawa T, Hayase S and Yoshikawa S 2009 J. Cryst. Growth 311 75710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.092 ↗
6. Liu Z Y, Subramania V and Misra M 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 14208
7. Shen Q, Sato T, Hashimoto M, Chen C C and Toyoda T 2006 Thin Solid Films 499 29910.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.019 ↗
8. Zhang Q, Wang H, Chen S, Su Y and Quan X 2017 RSC Adv. 7 1322310.1039/C7RA00039A ↗
9. Mazierski P, Nadolna J, Lisowski W and Winiarski M J 2017 Catal. Today 284 1910.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.004 ↗
10. Honciuc A, Laurin M and Albu S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 2014610.1021/jp107791r ↗
11. Lu R, Wang C and Wang X 2018 Int. J. Nanomed. 13 203710.2147/IJN.S155532 ↗
12. Yu J, Dai G and Huang B 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 1639410.1021/jp905247j ↗
13. Song P, Zhang X, Sun M, Cui X and Lin Y 2012 Nanoscales 4 1880
14. Hafez H, Wu J H, Lan Z, Li Q H and Xie G X 2010 Nanotechnology 21 41520110.1088/0957-4484/21/41/415201 ↗
15. Grätzel M 2005 Inorg. Chem. 44 684110.1021/ic0508371 ↗
16. Bingham S and Daoud W A 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 204110.1039/C0JM02271C ↗
17. Mou P, Pal U, Jiménez J and Pérez-Rodríguez F 2012 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7 110.1186/1556-276X-7-1 ↗
18. Li Q B, Lin J M, Wu J H, Lan Z and Wang Y 2011 Electrochim. Acta 56 498010.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.125 ↗
19. Saif M 2009 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 205 14510.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.04.020 ↗
20. Yin J B and Zhao X P 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 114 56110.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.10.011 ↗
21. Gafoor A K A, Thomas J, Musthafa M M and Pradyumnan P P 2011 J. Electron. Mater. 40 215210.1007/s11664-011-1707-9 ↗
22. Gao C M, Song H W, Hu L Y, Pan G H and Qin R F 2008 J. Lumin. 128 55910.1016/j.jlumin.2007.07.020 ↗
23. Kiisk V, Reedo V, Karbowiak M, Brik M G and Sildos I 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 12510710.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125107 ↗
24. Liu R, Yang W D and Qiang L S 2012 J. Power Sources 199 41810.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.072 ↗
25. Xu C Y, Zhang P X and Yan L 2001 J. Raman Specrosc. 32 86210.1002/jrs.773 ↗
26. Ohsaka T 1980 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 48 166110.1143/JPSJ.48.1661 ↗
27. Frindell K L, Bartl M H and Robinson M R 2003 J. Solid State Chem. 172 8110.1016/S0022-4596(02)00126-3 ↗
28. Jing F L, Harako S and Komuro S 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 08510910.1088/0022-3727/42/8/085109 ↗