journal article·2021-12

Photocatalytically active ZnO flaky nanoflowers for environmental remediation under solar light irradiation: effect of morphology on photocatalytic activity

G A Suganya Josephine, K Jayaprakash, G Meenakshi, A Sivasamy, G Nirmala Devi, R N Viswanath

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

ZnO-flaky-like nanoflowers with enhanced photocatalytic activity were synthesized by a new hydrothermal technique. The material was characterized and the photocatalytic studies were conducted under solar light irradiation for a model azo dye, Orange G. The material was compared with ZnO nanosphere and nanorod. The results showed the particle size of the nanostructures as a nanorod is 62–81 nm, as a nanosphere is 40–70 nm and as flaky nanoflowers is 20–30 nm (thickness of the flake). The photocatalytic activity showed an enhanced 2-fold increase in the activity for nanoflowers when compared to nanorods and spheres. The Brauner–Emmett–Teller results showed that the nanoflowers (14.197 m2 g−1) had a higher surface area nearly 3.5 times when compared to the nanospheres (4.06 m2 g−1) and seven times with nanorods (2.1 m2 g−1) which is the possibility of such high photocatalytic activity. The smaller particle size and the arrangement of nanoflowers play an important role in enhanced photocatalytic activity. ZnO flaky-nanoflowers as enhanced photocatalyst for the degradation of organics under solar light irradiation. It showed a two-fold increase in activity than ZnO nanospheres and nanorods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Rasmi P 2018 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 120 01201610.1088/1755-1315/120/1/012016 ↗
2. Zorawar S and Pooja C 2016 J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 39 1
3. Haibo C, Chen W, Li H, Ma R, Yu Z, Li L et al 2019 J. Environ. Manag. 237 51910.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.102 ↗
4. Stylidi M, Kondarides D I and Verykios X E 2004 Appl. Catal. B Environ. 47 18910.1016/j.apcatb.2003.09.014 ↗
5. Kezhen Q, Bei C, Yu J and Wingkei H 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 727 79210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142 ↗
6. Suganya Josephine G A, Saranya R and Sivasamy A 2015 J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 19 54910.1016/j.jscs.2015.05.011 ↗
7. Fujishima A and Honda K 1972 Nature 238 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
8. Li X, Lu X, Qi H, Yu K and Zhang K 2018 ChemistrySelect 15 502510.1002/slct.201800256 ↗
9. Rania A E, Gallia P, Magnus W and Omer N 2018 Photonics Nanostruct. 32 1110.1016/j.photonics.2018.08.005 ↗
10. Gunja S and Satya Pal S 2020 AIP Conf. Proc. 2220 020184
11. Ni Y H, Wei X W, Hong J M and Ye Y 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. 121 424710.1016/j.mseb.2005.02.065 ↗
12. Lin C S, Hwang C C, Lee W H and Tong W Y 2007 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 140 3110.1016/j.mseb.2007.03.023 ↗
13. Yang L Y, Dong S Y, Sun J H, Feng J L, Wu Q H and Sun S P 2010 J. Hazard. Mater. 179 43810.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.023 ↗
14. Ma H, Ma W, Chen J F, Liu X Y, Peng Y Y, Yang Z Y et al 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 527210.1021/jacs.8b01623 ↗
15. Chatterjee S, Bhanja P, Ghosh D, Kumar P, Kanti Das S, Dalapati S et al 2021 ChemSusChem 14 40810.1002/cssc.202002136 ↗
16. Tam K H, Djurisic A B, Chan C M B, Xi Y Y, Tse C W, Leung Y H et al 2008 Thin Solid Films 516 616710.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.081 ↗
17. Thanakorn W, Narongchai O C and Sorapong P 2013 Energy Procedia 34 80110.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.816 ↗
18. Vijayakumar B W, Shivaraj C, Manjunatha B, Abhishek G, Nagaraju P K and Panda 2020 Sens. Int. 1 10001810.1016/j.sintl.2020.100018 ↗
19. Lee K M, Lai C W, Ngai K S and Juan J C 2016 Water Res. 88 42810.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045 ↗
20. Madathil, Aneesh N P, Vanaja K A and Jayaraj M K 2007 Int. Soc. Opt. Photon. 6639 66390
21. Cao Z, Wang Y and Li Z 2016 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11 3410.1186/s11671-016-1250-y ↗
22. Suganya Josephine G A, Jayaprakash K, Suresh M and Sivasamy A 2019 Mater. Today Proc. 17 34510.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.440 ↗
23. Meenakshi G, Sivasamy A, Suganya Josephine G A and Kavitha S 2016 J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 411 16710.1016/j.molcata.2015.10.020 ↗
24. Meetani M A, Rauf M A, Hisaindee S, Khaleel A, Al Zamly A and Ahmad A 2011 RSC Adv. 1 49010.1039/c1ra00177a ↗