Density functional theory investigations on the interaction of uracil with borospherene
Source abstract
Abstract
The adsorption of uracil molecule on the B40 fullerene is scrutinized using density functional theory and non-equilibrium Green’s function regime. In this context, adsorption and total energies, charge transfer, binding distance, electron densities, density of states, molecular energy spectra, transmission spectra, highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) gap, I–V curve and differential conductance are determined. It is deduced that uracil molecule is physisorbed on the surface of borospherene with binding distance of 2.38 Å and no orbital overlapping exists between the two molecules. LUMO is dominant in transmission in both pristine B40 and uracil + B40 molecular junctions. The extent of coupling between the central molecule and metallic leads is more in case of pristine B40 molecular junction in comparison to the uracil + B40 device. From the molecular energy spectra, it is inferred that the HOMO–LUMO gap increases when uracil is adsorbed on the surface of B40. The values of current and differential conductance are different for the pristine B40 and uracil + B40 devices. This implies that borospherene can be effectively utilized as bio-marker for detecting the presence of uracil molecule and thus is an efficient sensor to predict the occurrence of mutations and cancerous tumors.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Graphene research and applications · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Krokan H E, Drablùs F and Slupphaug G 2002 Oncogene 21 893510.1038/sj.onc.1205996 ↗
2. Visnes T, Doseth B, Pettersen H S, Hagen L, Sousa M M L, Akbari M et al 2009 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364 56310.1098/rstb.2008.0186 ↗
3. Horvath A and Vertessy B G 2010 Nucl. Acids Res. 38 19610.1093/nar/gkq815 ↗
4. Rao K S 2007 Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 3 16210.1038/ncpneuro0448 ↗
5. Krokan H E and Bjøra M 2013 Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 012583
6. Wallace S S, Murphy D L and Sweasy J B 2012 Cancer Lett. 327 7310.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.038 ↗
7. https://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?ds:H00403
8. Cui J, Gizzi A and Stivers J T 2019 Nucl. Acids Res. 47 4153
9. Pettersen H S, Galashevskaya A, Doseth B, Sousa M M, Sarno A, Visnes T et al 2015 DNA Repair (Amst) 25 6010.1016/j.dnarep.2014.11.006 ↗
10. Maul R W and Gearhart P J 2010 Adv. Immunol. 105 15910.1016/S0065-2776(10)05006-6 ↗
11. Liu M and Schatz D G 2009 Trends Immunol. 30 17310.1016/j.it.2009.01.007 ↗
12. Yan N, O’Day E, Wheeler L A, Engelman A and Lieberman J 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 924410.1073/pnas.1102943108 ↗
13. Horvath A, Bekesi A, Muha V, Erdelyi M and Vertessy B G 2013 Fly (Austin) 7 2310.4161/fly.23192 ↗
14. Muha V, Horvath A, Bekesi A, Pukancsik M, Hodoscsek B, Merenyi G et al 2012 PLoS Genet. 8 e100273810.1371/journal.pgen.1002738 ↗
15. Zhai H J, Zhao Y F, Li W L, Chen Q, Bai H, Hu H S et al 2014 Nat. Chem. 6 72710.1038/nchem.1999 ↗
16. Yang Z, Ji Y L, Lan G, Xu L C, Liu X and Xu B 2015 Solid State Commun. 217 3810.1016/j.ssc.2015.05.013 ↗
17. Dong H, Hou T, Lee S T and Li Y 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 995210.1038/srep09952 ↗
18. Dong H, Lin B, Gilmore K, Hou T, Lee S T and Li Y 2015 Curr. Appl. Phys. 15 108410.1016/j.cap.2015.06.008 ↗
19. Gao G, Ma F, Jiao Y, Sun Q, Jiao Y, Waclawik E et al 2015 Comput. Mater. Sci. 108 3810.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.005 ↗
20. Moradi M, Vahabi V and Bodaghi A 2016 J. Mol. Liquids 223 31510.1016/j.molliq.2016.07.147 ↗
21. Tang C and Zhang X 2016 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 1699210.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.118 ↗
22. Maniei Z, Shakerzadeh E and Mahdavifar Z 2018 Chem. Phys. Lett. 691 36010.1016/j.cplett.2017.11.045 ↗
23. Lin B, Dong H, Du C, Hou T, Lin H and Li Y 2016 Nanotechnology 27 07550110.1088/0957-4484/27/7/075501 ↗
24. Kaur J, Kumar R, Vohra R and Sawhney R S 2020 J. Mol. Model 26 1710.1007/s00894-019-4279-x ↗
25. Fa W, Chen S, Pande S and Zeng X C 2015 J. Phys. Chem. A 119 1120810.1021/acs.jpca.5b07173 ↗
26. Shakerzadeh E, Biglari Z and Tahmasebi E 2016 Chem. Phys. Lett. 654 7610.1016/j.cplett.2016.05.014 ↗
27. Li Z, Yu G, Zhang X, Huang X and Chen W 2017 Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 94 20410.1016/j.physe.2017.08.011 ↗
28. Wang W, Guo Y D and Yan X H 2016 RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA00179C10.1039/C6RA00179C ↗
29. Wang J, Yu T, Gao Y and Wang Z 2017 Sci. China Mater. 60 126410.1007/s40843-017-9123-8 ↗
30. Shah E V and Roy D R 2016 Physica E 84 35410.1016/j.physe.2016.08.002 ↗
31. Kaur R and Kaur J 2017 J. Mol. Model. 23 35110.1007/s00894-017-3520-8 ↗
32. Kaur J and Kaur R 2017 8th ICCCNT 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2017.820396910.1109/ICCCNT.2017.8203969 ↗
33. Atomistic Toolkit Manual, Quantumwise Inc. Atomistix toolkit version 13.8.0, Quantumwise A/S (http://quantumwise.com)
34. Xue Y, Datta S and Ratner M A 2002 Chem. Phys. 281 15110.1016/S0301-0104(02)00446-9 ↗
35. Brandbyge M, Mozos J L, Ordejon P, Taylor J and Stokbro K 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 16540110.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401 ↗
36. Taylor J, Guo H and Wang J 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 24540710.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407 ↗
37. Carlo A D 2002 Physica B 314 21110.1016/S0921-4526(01)01449-1 ↗
38. Pecchia A and Carlo A D 2004 Rep. Prog. Phys. 67 149710.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R04 ↗
39. Magoga M and Joachim C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 472210.1103/PhysRevB.56.4722 ↗
40. Corbel S, Cerda J and Sautet P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 198910.1103/PhysRevB.60.1989 ↗
41. Cerdá J and Soria F 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 796510.1103/PhysRevB.61.7965 ↗
42. Emberly E G and Kirczenow G 2001 Phys. Rev. B 62 1045110.1103/PhysRevB.62.10451 ↗
43. Zahid F, Paulsson M, Polizzi E, Ghosh A W, Siddiqui L and Datta S 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 06470710.1063/1.1961289 ↗
44. Kienle D, Cerda J I and Ghosh A W 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 04371410.1063/1.2259818 ↗
45. Kienle D, Bevan K H, Liang G-C, Siddiqui L, Cerda J I and Ghosh A W 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 04371510.1063/1.2259820 ↗
46. Fronzi M, Ssoon A, Delley B, Traversa E and Stampfly C 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 10470110.1063/1.3191784 ↗
47. Fronzi M, Ssoon A, Delley B, Traversa E and Stampfly C 2009 Phys. Chem. Phys. 11 918810.1039/b901831j ↗
48. Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uracil
50. Cheng S, Sun X, Zhao L and Chen J 2019 Eur. Phys. J. D 73 Article ID 8810.1140/epjd/e2019-90357-0 ↗
51. Walia G K and Randhawa D K 2018 J. Mol. Model. 24 9410.1007/s00894-018-3631-x ↗
52. Deng F, Luo X-B, Ding L and Luo S-L 2019 Nanomaterials for the removal of pollutants and resource utilization 14910.1016/B978-0-12-814837-2.00005-6 ↗
53. Kaur M, Sawhney R S and Engles D 2016 J. Mater. Res. 31 202510.1557/jmr.2016.170 ↗
54. Kaur M, Sawhney R S and Engles D 2016 Mol. Phys. 114 325510.1080/00268976.2016.1226442 ↗
55. Kaur M, Sawhney R S and Engles D 2017 J. Mol. Graph. Mod. 71 18410.1016/j.jmgm.2016.10.017 ↗
56. Walia G K and Randhawa D K 2018 Struct. Chem. 29 25710.1007/s11224-017-1025-9 ↗
57. https://docs.quantumatk.com/manual/Types/DeviceDensityOfStates/DeviceDensityOfStates.html
58. Heurich J, Cuevas J C, Wenzel W and Schon G 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 25680310.1103/PhysRevLett.88.256803 ↗
59. Landauer R 1989 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1 8099
60. https://docs.quantumatk.com/manual/Types/TransmissionSpectrum/TransmissionSpectrum.html