Removal of textile dye from synthetic wastewater using microporous polymer nanocomposite
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the combined adsorption and photocatalysis on degradation of textile dye using microporous polymer nanocomposite. First, nanocomposites were synthesized by loading TiO2 nanoparticles of different weights (0.1–0.5 g) in polyurethane (PU) foam. The synthesized nanocomposites were characterized for bulk density, sol fraction and morphology. Degradation of methylene blue (MB) dye from an aqueous model pollutant was performed using pure TiO2 nanoparticles, unloaded PU foam and TiO2-loaded PU foam by exposing under UV and solar irradiations. It has been observed that degradation (due to TiO2 nanoparticles) and adsorption (due to PU foam) were happening simultaneously upon irradiation under solar and UV source. This mechanism was confirmed by analysing and comparing the MB dye degradation results for pure TiO2 nanoparticles (85% of dye degraded in 40 min), unloaded PU foam (40% degradation in 40 min) and TiO2-loaded PU foam (95% degradation in 20 min). Experimental data show pseudo-zero-order kinetics for UV irradiation (rate constant = 0.016 h–1), whereas solar irradiation follows first-order kinetics with rate constant 0.265 h–1.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Emmanuel E O, Hassan A and Azikiwe N 2020 Surf. Interfaces 21 10073410.1016/j.surfin.2020.100734 ↗
2. Gangopadhyay R and De A 2000 Chem. Mater. 12 60810.1021/cm990537f ↗
3. Persico P, Carfagna C and Musto P 2006 Macromol. Symp. 234 14710.1002/masy.200650219 ↗
4. Hule R A and Pochan D J 2007 MRS Bull. 32 35410.1557/mrs2007.235 ↗
5. Kurahatti R V, Surendranathan A O, Kori S A, Singh N, Kumar A and Srivastava S 2010 Def. Sci. J. 60 55110.14429/dsj.60.578 ↗
6. Huang X and Jiang P 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 54610.1002/adma.201401310 ↗
7. Sablani S 2015 in H Sánchez and G F López (eds) Food nanoscience and nanotechnology (New York: Springer) p 20510.1007/978-3-319-13596-0_12 ↗
8. Kondawar S B and Patil P T 2017 in V Kumar, S Kalia and H Swart (eds) Conducting polymer hybrids. Springer series on polymer and composite materials (Cham: Springer) p 22310.1007/978-3-319-46458-9_8 ↗
9. Lyu L, Liu J, Liang C, Gu J, Liu H, Liu C et al 2018 Eng. Sci. 2 26
10. Javni I, Song K, Lin J and Petrovic Z S 2011 J. Cell. Plast. 47 35710.1177/0021955X11398115 ↗
11. Sharma C, Kumar S, Unni A R, Aswal V K, Rath S K and Harikrishnan G 2014 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 842010.1002/app.40668 ↗
12. Akindoyo J O, Beg M D H, Ghazali S, Islam M R, Jeyarathnam N and Yuvaraj A R 2016 RSC Adv. 6 11445310.1039/C6RA14525F ↗
13. Tabuani D, Bellucci F, Terenzi A and Camino G 2012 Polym. Degrad. Stab. 97 259410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.011 ↗
14. Singh V P and Vaish R 2019 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 41910.1140/epjp/i2019-12778-7 ↗
15. Zhang T, Kong L, Zhang M, Qiu F, Rong J and Pan J 2016 RSC Adv. 6 8651010.1039/C6RA10916K ↗
16. Neta S J D J, Moreira G C, da Silva C J, Reis C and Reis E L 2011 Desalination 281 5510.1016/j.desal.2011.07.041 ↗
17. Vinhal J O, Lima C F and Cassella R J 2016 Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 131 7210.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.05.012 ↗
18. Varghese J, Chandan M R and Shanthakumar S 2020 Chem. Eng. Commun. 207 133710.1080/00986445.2019.1647181 ↗
19. Burkhart G, Kollmeier H and Schloens H 1984 J. Cell. Plast. 20 3710.1177/0021955X8402000103 ↗
20. Harikrishnan G, Patro T U and Khakhar D V 2006 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 712610.1021/ie0600994 ↗
21. Dorraji M S S, Ashjari H R, Rasoulifard M H and Rastgouy-Houjaghan M 2017 Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34 54710.1007/s11814-016-0261-9 ↗
22. Chamangard N and Asgharzadeh H 2016 CrystEngComm. 18 910310.1039/C6CE01777K ↗
23. Pinto J, Athanassiou A and Fragouli D 2016 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 49 14560110.1088/0022-3727/49/14/145601 ↗
24. Wei Q, Oribayo O, Feng X, Rempel G L and Pan Q 2018 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 891810.1021/acs.iecr.8b01037 ↗
25. Jain P and Pradeep T 2005 Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90 5910.1002/bit.20368 ↗
26. Liu T, Sun S, Zhou L, Li P, Su Z and Wei G 2019 Appl. Sci. 9 29310.3390/app9020293 ↗
27. Jang H and Kim S 2001 J. Nanopart. Res. 3 14110.1023/A:1017948330363 ↗
28. Lan Y, Lu Y and Ren Z 2013 Nano Energy 2 103110.1016/j.nanoen.2013.04.002 ↗
29. Mahmoud W, Rastogi T and Kummerer K 2017 Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 6 110.1016/j.cogsc.2017.04.001 ↗
30. Nasr M, Eid C, Habchi R, Meile P and Bechelany M 2018 ChemSusChem. 11 302310.1002/cssc.201800874 ↗
31. Yang Y, Wei Z, Wang C and Tonga Z 2013 Chem. Commun. 49 714410.1039/c3cc42270d ↗
32. Ibrahim S A and Sreekantan S 2010 Proceedings of ICXRI (Malaysia) p 84
33. Baldez E E, Robaina N F and Cassella R J 2008 J. Hazard. Mater. 159 58010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.055 ↗
34. Kasanen J, Salstela J, Suvanto M and Pakkanen T T 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 173810.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.028 ↗
35. Inderyas A, Bhatti I A, Ashar A, Ashraf M, Ghani A, Yousaf M et al 2020 Mater. Res. Express 7 02503310.1088/2053-1591/ab715f ↗