journal article·2017-09

In-situ microfibrillar PP–PA6 composites: rheological, morphological and mechanical properties

Ali Safaei, Mahmood Masoomi, Seyed Mohammad Reza Razavi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 40· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the rheology, morphology and mechanical properties of microfibrillar composites based on polypropylene reinforced with polyamide 6 (PA6) fibres have been investigated. Influence of different factors such as the PA6 composition and drawing ratio on the output of the extruder, and the compatibilizer composition on the properties of these composites, were investigated. The results of rheometric mechanical spectrometer rheological measurements and melt flow index (MFI) showed that the storage modulus, loss modulus and complex viscosity of the microfibrillar composites are directly related to the composition of PA6. It was also shown that the presence of compatibilizer was the main factor that led to decrease of some properties including the storage modulus, loss modulus and complex viscosity and increase in the MFI. The results of mechanical tests on samples prepared with different drawing ratios showed that by increasing the drawing ratio from 3 to 5, the mechanical properties increase, while increasing draw ratio from 5 to 8 reduces the mechanical properties. With the increase in the composition of the polyamide phase, the tensile strength of microfibrillar composite compatible with polypropylene-grafted-maleic anhydride initially increased; however, the tensile strength decreased with a high composition of polyamide phase. Scanning electron microscope images also revealed that the presence of the compatibilizer in the microfibrillar composites leads to decrease in the number of undeformed drops, while it reduces the micro-fibres diameter, which greatly improved the final properties of the composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Bhattacharyya D and Fakirov S 2012 Synthetic polymer–polymer composites (Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG)10.3139/9781569905258 ↗
2. Fakirov S and Bhattacharyya D 2015 Engineering biopolymers: homopolymers, blends, and composites (Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG)
3. Yi X et al 2010 Eur. Polym. J. 46 71910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.027 ↗
4. Bigdeli A et al 2012 J. Polym. Res. 19 110.1007/s10965-012-9990-6 ↗
5. Chomat D et al 2015 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 10 1002
6. Huang W Y et al 2003 Polym. Int. 52 113110.1002/pi.1204 ↗
7. Jayanarayanan K et al 2009 Eur. Polym. J. 45 173810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.02.024 ↗
8. Li X et al 1997 Polym. J. 29 97510.1295/polymj.29.975 ↗
9. Naficy S and Garmabi H 2007 Compos. Sci. Technol. 67 323310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.001 ↗
10. Pesneau I et al 2002 Polym. Eng. Sci. 42 199010.1002/pen.11091 ↗
11. Shen J et al 2011 Polym. Adv. Technol. 22 23710.1002/pat.1525 ↗
12. Tavanaie M, Shoushtari A and Goharpey F 2010 J. Macromol. Sci. B: Phys. 49 16310.1080/00222340903351874 ↗
13. Xu H S et al 2004 Macromol. Mater. Eng. 289 108710.1002/mame.200400197 ↗
14. Zoldan J, Siegmann A and Narkis M 2005 J. Macromol. Sci. B: Phys. 44 49510.1081/MB-200064792 ↗
15. Li Z et al 2002 Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 41 1910.1081/PPT-120002057 ↗
16. Houshyar S, Shanks R and Hodzic A 2005 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 96 226010.1002/app.20874 ↗